antohan
gets aroused by tagline boobs
Those are quite interesting options Red. Aldo is the hardest one to work out but Cruyff may not be a bad call at all, with Nedved moving to midfield. Would Cruyff and Zico get on though?
suck to be you, Aldo. We should move the draft to neutral place. RAWK?
You just lack any self awareness - go and read the last pages, it starts with you slagging off my team saying how easy it will be run through. Purely so you could get Maradona.
I started replying about your team because of the way you were going on about mine, I thought that was obvious. It was blatantly clear that its me against Stob+Anto in the next game because of how you're going on.
And anyway, that post doesn't explain why you want to get a right back "because Theon is a tit".. Why am I tit? Because I took Maradona? Grow up you complete nut job
Those are quite interesting options Red. Aldo is the hardest one to work out but Cruyff may not be a bad call at all, with Nedved moving to midfield. Would Cruyff and Zico get on though?
Yeah I have no idea of the psychologies. I guessed that Alonso-Rijkaard wouldn't be a bad central midfield especially against Brwned who doesn't have a spectacular centre himself. He can therefore drop Bremner and Nedved and play Cruyff and a 70s RB (Thuram?). Cruyff, Zico and Gullit behind Muller looks good to me. Third upgrade is a tough one. I suppose if Scirea's available luckily, he could go for him but that's doubtful. Maybe Gilmar?
Only two upgrades mate.
Ronaldo would be the dream Anto but there is no way he will slip through, VP has surely got his eyes on him for Ruud!
Ah thought it was 3 for some reason. I suppose your fullbacks are priority with the kind of wings that Brwned has. Zambrotta's okay I guess and there's no real quality LBs available so you have to secure one of the 3 quality 70s RBs. All 3 of them are greats luckily so you don't have to worry. That just leaves Bremner or Alonso to replace and the 40s have higher quality replacements with Cruyff the cream of them. That was my logic.
It's not a bad call dropping Nedved to allow for a 70s RB, playing Cruyff instead, and Alonso getting on the pitch.
Probably one of the best moves he could go for, if not the best.
You should be playing this stuff mate!
It's not a bad call dropping Nedved to allow for a 70s RB, playing Cruyff instead, and Alonso getting on the pitch.
Probably one of the best moves he could go for, if not the best.
You should be playing this stuff mate!
VPs best move doesn't include Ronaldo, I'm pretty confident on that. It's not the easiest to see as it involves a bit of shuffling around between midfield and defence.
Ahh okay, thought he may have been a 40's.. That makes it harder for him because he cant just go with Vogts.
Vogts is as good an option as any of the 70's lads but Brennan is a 30's so doesnt fit unfortunately
Yeah VP's a tough one. It seems like he needs to upgrade Brennan (though I personally know nothing about him) but the only quality RBs are in the 70s again so one strategy could be to trade Ruud for Charles and get Zanetti.
Else Matthaus for Deschamps or Ronaldo for Ruud and Vogts for Brennan which is what I originally thought he would do.
Yeah but Fergie's in the 40s and he's a player manager so it's a easy upgrade.
I did think of that and a million more options It was quite tedious to go over each and every manager and try to predict what they will do, so just decided on one of the simpler options. If it works, that'd be my luck, if it doesn't then feck it.
Yeah but Fergie's in the 40s and he's a player manager so it's a easy upgrade.
None of those solve the "Socrates is a passenger" issue, controversial as it may be. I reckon there must be a 50s pick involved there and Matthaus is really a no brainer.
I wouldn't be too worried about Brennan just yet but it's a good point that ultimately he may end up solving it with a 70s player who would have to take Scholes' or Ruud's place. Scholes is his ball pinging hub as it is so it's a no go, so adding another 70s striker to then possibly drop him would be low priority.
That's the way I saw it at least.
None of those solve the "Socrates is a passenger" issue, controversial as it may be. I reckon there must be a 50s pick involved there and Matthaus is really a no brainer.
I wouldn't be too worried about Brennan just yet but it's a good point that ultimately he may end up solving it with a 70s player who would have to take Scholes' or Ruud's place. Scholes is his ball pinging hub as it is so it's a no go, so adding another 70s striker to then possibly drop him would be low priority.
That's the way I saw it at least.
What did you do now anto? Why is my name appearing on RI's quote? I was wondering when the hell did I write all that.
If Socrates is an issue, Platini or Cruyff are the best way to go I guess as a central orchestrator for Ronaldo, Ruud and Gento though it does seem a pity to replace such high quality picked so early in the draft. Ruud and Deschamps are where he'll get the most bang his buck in upgrades which is why I thought he'd replace one of them.
Are you thinking Platini in the first part?
Perfect replacement for Socrates, but it would be an absolute coup if he lasted!
I think Vogts works fine as well though if you want to fix Brennan
No, a defender and Sammer moving to midfield behind Scholes and Matthaus. Top top midfield that.
If Socrates is an issue, Platini or Cruyff are the best way to go I guess as a central orchestrator for Ronaldo, Ruud and Gento though it does seem a pity to replace such high quality picked so early in the draft. Ruud and Deschamps are where he'll get the most bang his buck in upgrades which is why I thought he'd replace one of them.
Ah Scirea
I think I have my plan sorted.
Or Tresor. Don't want to start a rambling debate on Scirea again but I fancy Tresor as a better fit. Votes-wise probably Scirea.