TheLiverBird
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2014
- Messages
- 1,831
You don't understand boxing, with respect.
You don’t understand opinions
You don't understand boxing, with respect.
They said all the judges give him the win for different rounds. And one of the judges didn’t give him a round after 6 which is ridiculous really. I thought it was a close fight and usyk really couldn’t get close, fury jabbed him to deathYeah it’s obvious to anyone with eyes he won more than 4 rounds.
You don't understand boxing, with respect.
Hardly a disgrace
What are you talking about it's being debated on tv, it's hardly a clear cut decision. Nobody thinks it's clear cut.This is what I was talking about
He did, but Usyk is too slick.
Which rounds did you give to Fury?
I had it 8-4 as well, to be honest.
I certainly understand boxing, Fury was at least 3 rounds ahead for me coming into the 8th.
Yeah I’m similar. I am old school and do think you need to do a bit more as the challenger in a tight one and Fury probably didn’t hit that threshold to win the bout but the cards were definitely too wide.They said all the judges give him the win for different rounds. And one of the judges didn’t give him a round after 6 which is ridiculous really. I thought it was a close fight and usyk really couldn’t get close, fury jabbed him to death
3 rounds ahead going into the 8th? So he was 5-2 up? That’s a crazy opinion.What are you talking about it's being debated on tv, it's hardly a clear cut decision. Nobody thinks it's clear cut.
I certainly understand boxing, Fury was at least 3 rounds ahead for me coming into the 8th. The 10th he won, I give usyk the 8th, 11th and 12th. He 9, I wasn't sure.
Draw for me. 4 rounds is pathetic.
I'd love for you to explain why Usyk landed more punches, a higher percentage of punches, and more power punches, all while controlling the middle of the ring, if he 'couldn't get close.'They said all the judges give him the win for different rounds. And one of the judges didn’t give him a round after 6 which is ridiculous really. I thought it was a close fight and usyk really couldn’t get close, fury jabbed him to death
What are you talking about it's being debated on tv, it's hardly a clear cut decision. Nobody thinks it's clear cut.
I certainly understand boxing, Fury was at least 3 rounds ahead for me coming into the 8th. The 10th he won, I give usyk the 8th, 11th and 12th. He 9, I wasn't sure.
Draw for me. 4 rounds is pathetic.
Fury was nowhere near aggressive enough to win that. He'd have a good round and then back off and hand control back to Usyk. He wasn't consistent at all.
Holding and leaning on Usyk with 30s to go when he should have been using his weight advantage a lot more throughout the fight.
Absolutely hilarious to everyone complain about the scoring on the telly, there was no way Fury won that. For Usyk's first question to be about the scorecard was an piss-take.
Against a much bigger man too. But yes, Usyk controlled that fight.It was a tough fight but I’m not getting the controversy over the scale of the points decision. Usyk landed the cleaner punches and spent the majority of the fight in the centre of the ring controlling the fight.
I tried to score it with a Tyson bias and going into the last round I thought Usyk was up by two. I have no idea how anyone can find six rounds that Tyson won. Usyk threw more volume, more accurately, and was on the front font against the bigger man.
Whether it was four, two, one, rounds. It doesn’t really matter. Fury didn’t win that fight.
Because he couldn’t. Between the ref breaking them up and Usyk slipping and sliding out and away, Fury didn’t get many chances to even try. He also got flurries of effective punches when trying to get in recklessly.He didn't though, not consistently and not with any real conviction, I didn't see him really lean on Usyk until over half way through the fight.
Why does against a bigger man keep getting brought up for a reason why he won? It makes no difference to the scoring.I'm curious if all these Fury fans making excuses think he is a better boxer than Usyk?
On another note, Hearn talking about the Fury/Joshua fight and making it clear it's about the money. Absolute cretin, but people will lap it up.
Against a much bigger man too. But yes, Usyk controlled that fight.
Someone the weight class below came in and showed them all up. Says it all.So how good was the heavyweight era of Fury, AJ and Wilder?
Fair scoring? Did u see the Allen v fisher fight on the undercard.Maybe Saudi is investing in fair scoring, to a degree, over pushing the money fighter more... which to be fair, if is a consistent thing, would actually push me towards asking for more fights to be in Saudi over Vegas.... no way that's a UD in America.
But Usyk-Dubois is such a massive massive drop off in appeal for so many reasons that they'll be more likely to actually UP the price for Fury-Joshua
I didn't think either fighter done enough to win, never mind by 4 rounds.It seems all the close rounds went to Usyk, that's the way it goes sometimes.
Usyk is a class act in and out of the ring good luck to him.
Hahaha. Fury Should retire because it Will most probably continue to go downhill from here. Chisora vs Wallin will be a fun Watch though.Fury v AJ. Winner gets to fight Chisora
It’s being debated by people who have a high degree of bias. I don’t think Usyk won the margin he did, but I’m still totally convinced he won.
If you don’t agree with the result - fine, state the rounds you feel Fury won. But using the arguement “it’s debatable, look at the TV folk saying it!” is as ridiculous as saying a penalty was justifiably given to City because everyone on blue moon says it is.
I’m not a Fury fan. I tried scoring with a bias for him to counter the very conscious bias I have against him.The only sound Fury fan post I’ve seen.
Because he couldn’t. Between the ref breaking them up and Usyk slipping and sliding out and away, Fury didn’t get many chances to even try. He also got flurries of effective punches when trying to get in recklessly.