Decotron
Full Member
How the feck did 2 judges have that fight 76-75? that's nearly as bad as the refs call
Groves was only up by one point. Watt is outraged by it.
I thought it was a bit early first up, and then first replay
But then when you see the super slo-mo, there were two quality shots in that last melee, a left followed by a right. So, not a terrible call imo, maybe a shade early, but Froch would have gone on and won it that round
The judges had it a bit too close imo, I didn't have it anywhere near as wide as the commentator did though
There was not a hell in chance he was.
Anyone reckon Froch might retire now anyway?
SKY tv and Jim Watt were so far up Groves's arse it was unreal. The bias was akin to Jamie Rednapp being a pundit for a Liverpool game v Manchester United. They should sack the fecker.
Doesn't change the fact that Froch was anywhere, or should have been anywhere near Groves ob the score cards.
Well if we are going off quality shots that stop the fight, then it should have happened in the first round, no?
Definitely. I still don't understand it.Oh yeah I think he was on his way down shortly but it was too early. Robbery.
Doesn't change the fact that Froch was anywhere, or should have been anywhere near Groves ob the score cards.
One night with Froch wife.Definitely. I still don't understand it.
He must have a nice new shiny car parked up outside or something to make that call.
Why? Froch got back up right after a heavy right hand. His reputation saved him in the first round and the other rounds where he was roundly picked off, but the fact that he fought back saved him in the rounds upto the end. That is the difference, when you take shots and you don't fight back, chances are you lose the fight because the referee has to make a call.
Get to feck.
I don't care £5 @ 14-1
We are talking before, during and after the fight. SKY and Watt already had their favourites and Watt most certainly was pissed off because he probably bet a few quid on Groves to win. Now I know why I watch very little boxing from SKY, with idiots like Watt I can see why.
What the pundit said, and Groves said is trueWell if we are going off quality shots that stop the fight, then it should have happened in the first round, no?
Froch isn't helping. He's acting like a wrestling heel. Then again, boxing isn't any better than WWE at this point. Disgraceful shit.
Froch sounds like a fecking politician. Give it a rest
Carl Froch retains his WWE championship then cuts a heel promo after a referee double cross.
Just need Groves to put him through the Spanish announce table to end the show now.
Carl Froch retains his WWE championship then cuts a heel promo after a referee double cross.
Just need Groves to put him through the Spanish announce table to end the show now.
It was the first time Groves got wobbled! Froch got wobbled in every fecking round tonight, yet he was let to continue, so why not show the same courtesy to Groves?
In your opinion he got wobbled, but for me, Froch took the shots and threw some back of his own, that is the difference. Now, do you understand? If the referee had let the fight go on, then Groves would have been dribbling on the canvas because when he took those two big shots from Carl his legs were going and Froch is an experienced fighter. By the same token, Groves knocked down Froch in the first round, but afterwards Froch took every single one of his right hands including 6 in one round and was still standing and throwing his own.
Who are these two clowns yous are moaning about? Isn't there some real boxing on tonight? bite.
That one will be a cracker, the two camps hate each other now