antohan
gets aroused by tagline boobs
It's @BorisDeLeFora's turn though
I agree, great defender and a better "CB" than any other libero, but to get the full package you want him influencing the game further up the pitch as well. I'd argue Briegel for Rodríguez was more important than Passarella for Campbell.
A bad pass and he was in no man's land though.
But if they are dovetailing up the pitch that's exactly why you want a LB who can stay back. Mind, McGrath does fill me with confidence. Heck, it was my 50's CB pair, Passarella-McGrath, but I had Briegel out on the left with clear instructions to tuck in and cover him as and when. Not that anyone paid any attention, I had to put about ten men behind the ball in defence at times
Can't disagree with much of that Anto - think you're spot on mostly there.
Aye, Passarella for Campbell wasn't as big a jump as someone like Briegel for Rodriguez because Sol was a fantastic defender in his own right. Probably wouldn't have been Briegel mind - there's a certain left back I'm sure you've had your eye on who wasn't too shabby in Brazilian Magic Squares
Long term I think this was the better move though because I couldn't risk Passarella not becoming available again - I think he's lovely there and given that Scirea doesn't fit, he was the best defender available. Plus I like what he brings to the side in terms of fitting a certain style of attractive football.
Agreed on the risk of passes going astray, that's always a risk with libero's of this sort - though even Passarella's passing surprised me in the sense that it wasn't hugely expansive in the games I saw. He usually would play it nice and sharp, the short of neat passes Keane mastered, and when he fizzed in a pass to midfield and burst forward for the return, it was more likely that the other chap misplaced the return ball than the other way around.
Alaba played again centerback today by the way. He's pretty much first choice left sided centerback in the back 3 and with all our injuries also an option at centerback in a back four. I know, small samplesize so far, but he's clearly disciplined and smart enough to 'tuck in'.Yes, he was ideal for your four at the back. I would say the same there though: not with Alaba. It doesn't mean you need Chiellini at LB, it can be someone who can attack, but also tuck in. That's why I'm always out to get one of Briegel and Abidal, they are great for that, particularly in a draft featuring Passarella.
Alaba played again centerback today by the way. He's pretty much first choice left sided centerback in the back 3 and with all our injuries also an option at centerback in a back four. I know, small samplesize so far, but he's clearly disciplined and smart enough to 'tuck in'.
Kohler
Therein lies the problem. It isn't Passarella fecking up (his balls were simple indeed), it's the recipient being muscled off the ball or, even worse, the next pass being intercepted as he bursts forward to receive it. You are left completely exposed then, and he ain't the quickest. Say you are playing me, quick ball to Boniek who makes short work of Rodríguez and suddenly it's McGrath caught in headlights against Zibi, Vieri and Baggio. Götze himself is getting in the act before Daniel. Yes, he is trying his best to get back but forget positioning, he will just about make it somewhere, not necessarily where he is most needed. Good luck with that. Same with Robben, and Figo/Overmars, or Conti/Stoichkov. It's completely mental unless you instruct him to just play CB, in which case, he isn't at his best.
Alaba played again centerback today by the way. He's pretty much first choice left sided centerback in the back 3 and with all our injuries also an option at centerback in a back four. I know, small samplesize so far, but he's clearly disciplined and smart enough to 'tuck in'.
I don't think there's anything between Kohler and Passarella when it comes to defending. But mehh, it's not silly to say Kohler is slightly better defensively - but its marginal if anything. Passarella read the game fantastically well and he could be just as physical in the challenge. Really I don't think there's much in it.
In possession though Passarella brings more to the side, so overall I think he's comfortably better.
Losing the ball is a risk with any libero though, it comes with the role. And as libero's go Passarella was one of the safer ones because he didn't dribble out of defence and he didn't constantly try 50 yard passes.
As above, defensively he is better than the others, that's why he can play a four, and also why he wouldn't try fancy stuff that could backfire (less cover to rely on). Having the wrong fullback is even less cover though.
Anyway, we'll go Cafu. Must be some sort of record the number of times I've had him.
That view is fair enough, Rodriguez certainly isn't the perfect fit there.
Interesting point there actually Anto - did Passarella not try the fancy stuff because he was in a four, or because that just wasn't his style. I've always assumed it was the latter but it could well be that he played that way because the Argie's played a four man defence. Probably a mix of the two.
To be fair, Alaba wins that contest on talent alone, not even included that his tactical understanding of the game is most likely on a completely different level as well after learning the game under van Gaal, Heynckes and Guardiola. Sure, he lacks experience and obviously I'd take someone like Briegel over him for that role. However, I don't think it's outragous to suggest that Alaba and Passarella could make it work and take turns in making runs forward depending on the situation. What you want from your fullback there is mainly cover against counterattacks as a wide centerback and from what I've seen of Alaba in that role, he's definitely capable of giving that.Incredibly small, I still don't rate Rojo as a CB and he has been doing it for far longer.
Yeah, he goes back home, I'm more of a Zanetti guy and he knows it But then, I wanted the option of a 3-5-2 and they don't come better than him for that. Oh well... It was pointless to pick him without planning on playing him though.
And I'm also delighted to have Baggio instead
There goes Cafu, Baggio and Figo from my ex-team. Looks like no one is going to touch any of the other left-overs (maybe Koeman and Lerby but highly doubt it) from my team though.
Would have loved Lerby, but with Effenberg, Lucho and Hierro I'm done with midfielders unless a really top GOAT tier one is available.
That was your 22,222 post. So erm congrats I guess.
I really wanted to have Effenberg in my previous team but then perhaps I would have been better served with going for a more creative combative midfielder instead as my De Rossi pick flopped considerably. Pretty sure Effenberg wouldn't have done better in that regard.
I'll have to ruin that and wait fo 33,333 but for good reason. How can you possibly equate/compare Effenberg and De Rossi? Have a word...
Seriously, it isn't just you who sees him purely as some sort of midfield destroyer. That's why I emphasised people should check the youtube link in his profile (page 63), his passing range and eye for a pass was exceptional.
Would have loved Lerby, but with Effenberg, Lucho and Hierro I'm done with midfielders unless a really top GOAT tier one is available.
It's Effenberg and Hierro. In any case, I wouldn't worry about the other pairing if it's the right setup. Effenberg doesn't need to be gung-ho, he can dictate play from midfield. Lucho instead... you would have the same issue I pointed out earlier with Keane, you can't ask someone who's natural instinct is to drive forward to sit deep. He puts in a great defensive shift but once you get possession he will be bursting up the pitch, asking him to do anything but that is folly.
It's the sort of thing I'd like to have as an option (a 5-3-2 with Hierro central as sweeper/anchor Stielike style). That's why I looked into Cafu, but Baggio is more important, as you point out.
You are dropping Boniek there though
I'll be boring and take Deschamps
Again sorry for the delay
What are you planning? Figo when you have Mendieta.