to say LVG failed to fix problems is a joke. He didn’t get a striker? We brought Falcao. He then got rid of Falcao and RVP because they was over the hill and brought a talented Martial. What’s wrong with that?
LVG was very much a joke and there is lots wrong with it. He bought Falcao who was well over the hill by then and certainly not over his knee injuries as a player he used to be. So he basically got 2 old over the hill strikers for over 250k a week. Not the smartest of moves. Compare that to Jose who turfed out some OAPs and brought in Zlatan who banged in 28 goals.. I think it makes LVGs move pretty pale in comparison.
On top of that Martial was a big risk signing and not ready to be a consistent starter for a big club like United after what 11 starts for Monaco. Plus he was played on the left wing not up top.
So yeah, LVG didn't really fix our issues. The best he did was sign a good player in Martial, who wasnt even a number 9 so completely unrelated to the gaping hole we had upfront.
Blind at CB was a success and if we continued to play that B-tec tika taka way he would still be a success now. Mourinho got the best years of Valencia at RB so I don’t get how LVG doesn’t get credit for converting him into that position. Yes it naturally was going to have its ups and downs at first like the Arsenal game but other than that he’s been a top RB.
We never started to play a "tiki taka" way under LVG. Where on earth did you suggest we can continue it from? Blind suits a back 3 but never should be part of a back 4 as 2 centre backs. He has no central cover and would struggle massively unless he's in a defensive set up like LVG (who stunted his midfielders from advancing in the process).
There is a reason why Blinds best move ended up being Holland rather than a major league. So basically LVG didn't really massively improve the quality of our defence, he left a hole in the number 9 position and wasted funds on 2 flop midfielders and 2 flop wingers during his 2 years at the club.
In other words, he fecked up transfers and fecked up our style of play.
Jose came in and put world class quality into the team where as LVG was willing to coach the players he had, as you noted though.. some of them badly lol. However in hindsight I think we would have seen a better Luke Shaw, Martial, Rashford, Blind, Pereira and Borthwick-Jackson if he stayed. But it was time for us to move on. Only difference is this team was actually ready for Pep and not a Mourinho.
I have no idea why you keep comparing LVGs absolute shambles of management to what Jose is doing. LVG fecked up in so many ways. His progress was literally the definition of backwards.
Season 1- LVG took us to 4th with 70 points.
Season 2- LVG dropped to 5th with 66 points.
Win % after 2 seasons was 52%.
Now let's do Mourinho:
Season 1 - ended 6th but won Europa to get us back into CL. 69 points which was more than LVG in year 2 without any Europa League distractions.
Season 2 - 82 points and the best finish and goal difference since SAF.
Mourinho win % is currently 62%.
There is no leg to stand on to defend LVGs transfers or philosophy or results in comparison to Mourinho. I have no idea why you're even bothering to defend him or suggest he did little different to Jose.