So Ed works for Mourinho? Who cares if Fellaini was cocky, does that mean we should grant the demand of each and every cocky player?
It's called working in tandem, give and take. It isn't as black and white / all or nothing as you continually suggest.
Do you believe during Fergie's tenure at the club he got every player he ever wanted? Edwards & Gill I'm sure quite often vetoed some of Fergie's suggestions. Actually what am I on about, we all know this cause Fergie admitted as much in his biographies.
No we don't give into every single player but hey when the team manager goes public repeatedly stating just how incredibly important Fellaini is to the team and your future plans, you deliver... I mean look at how incredibly petty you and a large section of our fan base have reacted since the summer cause Jose didn't get his new centre back.
Maybe, just maybe Jose didn't get his CB cause he'd already been given Sanchez (26m in wages), Fellaini's new deal, Fred for another 52m and add in the 20m approx for the injured kid Dalot... Over 100m there in a matter of months.
Jose got Fellaini, he did not get his CB of choice... The very definition of what? Give and take and working together. Otherwise its the Chief Exec bending over backwards spoiling his manager or the flip side is Woodward being Chief Exec and team manager and Jose having zero input.
Reality is its somewhere in between.
It was Ed's choice to wait till the last day before renewing the contract. They could have renewed it a year earlier or let him walk and bring in a replacement. Ed decided when he wanted to renew the contract and the terms that were offered. Mourinho and Fellaini are subordiantes to Ed and the logic that they trumped Ed is just silly
What you posted IS factually untrue!
of our 13 league games, Fred has appeared in 7 starting 6 of them. That is >50% but to you, Fred is barely making the bench. Is it not more likely that he has had his opportunities and failed to seize them and hold his spot? BTW it was Ed that negotiated and decided Fred was worth 52m, not Mourinho.
Well done, I've already pointed out that Ed most likely didn't see the benefit of keeping Fellaini, at least not on the extortionate wages he was requesting. So of course things dragged out right to the last day of his contract.
You literally in the space of a few lines contradicted yourself to slate Woodward and praise Jose, the replacement was who? Fred.
But being as you want to talk about appearances Fellaini has played a total of 738 mins of football compared to Fred's 581 mins. Now remember, Fellaini arrived back late from the World Cup also and was not available for selection until Oct yet he's still managed to play more than his new signing.
Similarly, pereira has had 4 appearances including 2 starts. He has had opportunities and if he was convincing, he would have earned his spot
Sure, like that Brighton game that both Fred and Pereira started and we conceded 3 goals in the first half?
You can't seriously believe this crap? I mean honestly, you say Periera was rightly dropped, yet here we are with Matic being consistently, utterly woeful every single game and keeps his place? And you defend that?
As for the Brighton game, well I raise you the Derby game where Matic started and was a turd and we couldn't beat a Championship team quickly followed by West Ham where Fellaini and Matic started and played the entire game and we got smashed 3-1.
Other wonderful midfield performances with Matic and Fellaini were Valencia at home, a bore draw and being played off the park by City the other week.
Is it any wonder we are having our worst season since the 70s when we've an idiot manager going with the same set up every single game and expecting different results.. One player has a bad game and doesn't get selected again, yet Fellaini and Matic can be poor for months on end and face no such action?
So just play anyone cos they are young?
and yet Daley Blind left!
You're just coming across as a WUM now.
Where did I say just play youth cause they are young?
It's common sense that young players have a point to prove, Matic as just pointed out has arguably been our worst player this season and plays religiously and you defend that and then state Jose was right to drop Periera and play Fellaini more than Fred?
Is it any wonder City humiliated us a few weeks back starting with Fellaini and Matic in midfield? Any one defending that selection is an embarrassment, same way Jose was selecting that team with Fred (who performed brilliantly against City in the Champions League) sat on the bench.
As for Blind, it's give and take remember
A concept you seem to have no notion about.
That is just nonsense. Both players and Mourinho work for Ed and he can sell/fire any of them at his discretion. The idea that Mourinho weakens the clubs negotiating position is preposterous. If that were true why are we not paying Fellaini 400k?
They do work for him but again, how would quick fire sales of numerous players and sacking managers be beneficial to the club? Again.. Give and take! There's a happy medium to be found. No manager gets every request granted to them, in reality it should be about 50/50.
Ed could have brought in a replacement but Fellaini's comments about 50m for a midfielder hints at the crux of the issue i.e. it was cheaper to renew fellaini than buy a new player.
Ugh, he did bring in a replacement... again, for the up tenth time... his name is Fred! He cost how much as well? So guess what no it wasn't bloody cheaper at all in anyway shape or form. Jose got his big lump of a tree in Fellaini... AND... A new midfielder also.
But when he couldn't get his CB, queue the public outrage and brain washed folks like yourself fall for it!
I think its safe to say you are well and truly brain washed and can see nowt wrong done by Jose.