cyberman
Full Member
- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 37,331
Why is 5 the barometer and not 4?Apparently, City has scored 5 goals or more 21 times since the last time we did it.
Why is 5 the barometer and not 4?Apparently, City has scored 5 goals or more 21 times since the last time we did it.
Why is 5 the barometer and not 4?
i do not enjoy watching heavily lopsided matches in any sport.Believe it or not, it’s watching my team score goals that makes my day. The more the better.
At what point did you stop enjoying us put 7 goals past Roma, by the way? Or 8 past Arsenal? Were you too worried about the bruised emotions of the opposition to enjoy anything past the third goal in those routs?
You mean that you won't enjoy united scoring 5 or 6 goals in a match just because it becomes lopsided? What the actual feck?i do not enjoy watching heavily lopsided matches in any sport.
You mean that you won't enjoy united scoring 5 or 6 goals in a match just because it becomes lopsided? What the actual feck?
Well its difficult for me to fathom that but well, its people's choice.Nothing wrong with that. Some people fancy a tight match. Some people fancy a drubbing. Each to his own.
Rather than attributing it incorrectly to a tactical curiousity or desire to give others time, the lack of "piling it on" really stems from two things - A) An inability to build a team capable of doing so and B) A defensive/cautious mindset. Every manager would rather win 6-0 than 2-0, that much is obvious, and both of those points apply to our current manager. He is struggling to builf a high quality cohesive football team at Manchester United, and isn't an attacking manager anyway.Not every manager wants to pile on the goals, with most likely to take the foot of the pedal once they have the clear advantage and rather use the time to try new tactics/formations or give other players time on the pitch
this thread has hit rock bottom again. What sort of supporter wants narrow wins over dismantling teams? I've seen some bizarre opinions on here, but thats a bloody new and weird one.
I can understand not wanting to watch one sided sporting events when you're a neutral, but surely you want your team to be the best?
Jose actually said it last season. Jose makes the excuses, his fans only rationalise themThis thread has hit farcical status. The Jose-in brigade have sunk to all new levels: Oh but I hate the goals, so I do
I see your point, but we all know that the club will go on the safer route, unfortunately.The bigger picture would getting rid of our archaic manager and getting someone who can move the club forward.
We've spent money but look where we are now. Having more money won't change that. We've seen that even signing one of the best players in the league can turn ugly.
You are factually right but unless we make real changes all those points are null and void.
Does this mean some Utd fans on here cheer when we miss chances? Wouldn't want to get too far ahead of our opponents, that would be boring.
Link please?Jose actually said it last season. Jose makes the excuses, his fans only rationalise them
The 7-1 win against Roma was probably the most enjoyable 90 minutes of football in my almost 40 years watching Manchester United.
There’s been better moments but for sustained pleasure I would struggle to think of a game that I enjoyed more (8-2 against Arsenal would come close tbf).
Blows my mind that anyone could have been watching that thinking “Jaysus, lads, take the foot off the gas, ffs! Nobody wants to see the opposition get humiliated “
Link please?
That match made me sick to the stomach. Imagine how those poor Roma players felt! Have you not got a shred of empathy in you?
"I still don't understand these words of 'entertaining'," he told a news conference. "You think 6-0 is entertaining? I don't think so.Link please?
Nearly turned my back on the football that night, the pure barbarity of it.....
He might be talking as a neutral."I still don't understand these words of 'entertaining'," he told a news conference. "You think 6-0 is entertaining? I don't think so.
"I think entertaining is emotion until the end, open result until the end, everybody on their seats until the end, both dugouts nervous and tense with the unpredictability of the result.
"That, for me as a football lover, that's entertaining. So, I think it's going to be entertaining."
As a neutral, yeah. Those are way more entertaining."I still don't understand these words of 'entertaining'," he told a news conference. "You think 6-0 is entertaining? I don't think so.
"I think entertaining is emotion until the end, open result until the end, everybody on their seats until the end, both dugouts nervous and tense with the unpredictability of the result.
"That, for me as a football lover, that's entertaining. So, I think it's going to be entertaining."
He's just incapable of it.He's doing the usual deflection.
I have absolutely no doubt that he would rather win a game by 6 than by 1 or 2.
To be clear, we are talking about 5+ goal margins i.e 5-0, 6-0, 8-1 etcYou mean that you won't enjoy united scoring 5 or 6 goals in a match just because it becomes lopsided? What the actual feck?
Did a quick count of their seasons under Pep (https://www.skysports.com/manchester-city-results/2016-17) and counted 16 scores with 5 or more for them in that time alone (not +5 GD, mind).Apparently, City has scored 5 goals or more 21 times since the last time we did it.
The context of the interview was when he was getting stick towards the end of last season for our boring football. He was talking about us, not only as a neutral.He might be talking as a neutral.
Otherwise, it's just another example what he's not a good fit for this club.
A Manchester United manager should always try to get his team score as many goals as possible.
The context of the interview was when he was getting stick towards the end of last season for our boring football. He was talking about us, not only as a neutral.
Your argument is flawed given that if your team was not capable, you would not have overwhelmed the opposition so easily in the first place. Also managers withdrawing their starting attackers and giving others attacking players a run out is not evidence of a defensive mindset.Rather than attributing it incorrectly to a tactical curiousity or desire to give others time, the lack of "piling it on" really stems from two things - A) An inability to build a team capable of doing so and B) A defensive/cautious mindset. Every manager would rather win 6-0 than 2-0, that much is obvious, and both of those points apply to our current manager. He is struggling to builf a high quality cohesive football team at Manchester United, and isn't an attacking manager anyway.
If that is what makes your day - great!As a personal preference you may like whatever you do of course. But I completely disagree. I want United to do as well as possible and within a single game, that relates to winning as convincingly as possible.
To be clear, we are talking about 5+ goal margins i.e 5-0, 6-0, 8-1 etc
You might enjoy it, I dont - to each his own
You didn't enjoy the 8-2 win against Arsenal? Are you sure
My choices would be from 1999 and would be joint between the 2-1 FA semis win over arsenal with the giggs goal playing with 10-men and the CL final 2-1 win over bayern.The 7-1 win against Roma was probably the most enjoyable 90 minutes of football in my almost 40 years watching Manchester United.
There’s been better moments but for sustained pleasure I would struggle to think of a game that I enjoyed more (8-2 against Arsenal would come close tbf).
Blows my mind that anyone could have been watching that thinking “Jaysus, lads, take the foot off the gas, ffs! Nobody wants to see the opposition get humiliated “