FC Ronaldo
Posts stuff that's been said before in tweet form
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2014
- Messages
- 12,032
Sounds like Silva's done folks...
I don't want to see him fight GSP. I think GSP even with his hiatus would soundly beat Silva of todayAlways best to give it time. If he does fight again the most interesting question is who. He won't fight for the title again, so you're likely looking at a step up to LHW again or a super fight with GSP.
I don't want to see him fight GSP. I think GSP even with his hiatus would soundly beat Silva of today
Gsp would destroy him on the gound and up against the cage IMO anywaysNo way! GSP wouldn't stand a chance. That was Silvas first fight back after a broken leg, you can't judge him for that. It's only natural for him to be cagey and cautious, he already showed incredible courage and mental strength to get back so quickly. When he loosened up he still looked quick and elusive as ever.
GSP is much the smaller man and his striking isn't even close to Silva's, just look how badly Hendricks beat up GSP.
Dana White said pre fight that if Silva won he would get a title shot but who knows if even wants to fight Weidman again.
Gsp would destroy him on the gound and up against the cage IMO anyways
Maybe I would like to see the fight
Agreed, what the f was that all about telling him he's looking good in the 4th round when it was clear to everyone he was way behind and needed to knock or tap Silva out to get the win.Diaz needs to get a corner that doesn't just tell him what he wants to hear.
Agreed, what the f was that all about telling him he's looking good in the 4th round when it was clear to everyone he was way behind and needed to knock or tap Silva out to get the win.
That sucks! This will most likely be the end of his career. Why on earth do these fighters think they won't get popped?
yeah I think i might be done with this damn sportAnderson popped for steroids... and Diaz for weed
The UFC shouldn't be losing credibility. It's one of the few organizations that is actually doing something about PEDs. For example, look how rare it is for NFL players to be busted and then look at the actual NFL players. Baseball and cycling scandals only really came about due to whistle blowing.
Whilst you have a point there's a slight difference in the ones you mention and the UFC.
For starters the UFC has competition which could tarnish their name and try and damage it somewhat, there's no real through to NFL, MLB or cycling and there is no alternative, or at least not one that's of a similar standard, them sports have basically been monopolized. There's various MMA companies and whilst is the best there is others that could provide viable competition in the future if the PR fallout from this is bad.
The timing is also bad as well, as is pointed out the fact the show went ahead despite the quick turnaround of drug test results does imply they knew and kept it going as it was all about making money and not keeping in line with the rules and fair competition.
He's also viewed as one of the best ever fighters. I'd argue cycling took a bit of a beating after the Armstrong scandal and the same could happen to UFC. It won't bankrupt the company or anything but I'd imagine rival promoters are going to use this as some kind of ammunition. When it's someone who is that good at the sport the legacy of the sport as well as the person will always get tarnished.
Whilst you have a point there's a slight difference in the ones you mention and the UFC.
For starters the UFC has competition which could tarnish their name and try and damage it somewhat, there's no real through to NFL, MLB or cycling and there is no alternative, or at least not one that's of a similar standard, them sports have basically been monopolized. There's various MMA companies and whilst is the best there is others that could provide viable competition in the future if the PR fallout from this is bad.
The timing is also bad as well, as is pointed out the fact the show went ahead despite the quick turnaround of drug test results does imply they knew and kept it going as it was all about making money and not keeping in line with the rules and fair competition.
He's also viewed as one of the best ever fighters. I'd argue cycling took a bit of a beating after the Armstrong scandal and the same could happen to UFC. It won't bankrupt the company or anything but I'd imagine rival promoters are going to use this as some kind of ammunition. When it's someone who is that good at the sport the legacy of the sport as well as the person will always get tarnished.
I would think majority of fight fans don't give a crap if a fighter is using PEDS. They just want to see two guys fight each other. There is no real competition to the UFC and other organistions such as Belator always snap up released UFC fighters who some have been popped for PEDS. So I don't see it hurting UFC at all.
I would think majority of fight fans don't give a crap if a fighter is using PEDS. They just want to see two guys fight each other. There is no real competition to the UFC and other organistions such as Belator always snap up released UFC fighters who some have been popped for PEDS. So I don't see it hurting UFC at all.
I see it being a huge blow and I also think most fans will give a shit
Lets just judge us on the Caf. I reckon most did not like this news at all
For me it has totally tarnished Silva which is rather upsetting for me
Jones and Fedor will have something to say about that as well.So GSP cements himself as the GOAT
Cocaine and Weed for me are nowhere near as bad as PED's in a sport situation, If Jones or Diaz were doing drugs while they were around their children then I'd be like what is wrong with them? But if they were doing it in their personal time in a club or with some friends it doesn't make me disregard their fighting ability. But I do now look at Anderson differently and that is sad as he was such a great asset for the sport.The fact that two such high profile fighters had this happen will really get some people questioning the sport. I mean their current best fighter (Jones) and arguably their best ever (Silva) both have been labelled as drug cheats. What does that show for the sport? That cheating makes you the best? Horrible message.
I'm disappointed but it's not going to make me stop watching their product. That's why i said I don't think it would hurt the UFC as we as the consumer will still watch it.
How do even become MMA fans if you have a problem with PEDs?
Right from it's very inception PED use was well known of. Royce Gracie, the winner of the the original UFC events was even busted. Every major part of the sports history has involved PEDs. How to do you have such a problem with PED use, when surely most people wouldn't have even been got into MMA if it wasn't for PED use? Isn't the fight that saved Zuffa, Griffin vs Bonnar? Wasn't Pride untested in Japan? Isn't the biggest draw in the sports history Brock Lesnar? How do people watch the evolution of this sport and then start condemning PED users as if they are cheating the audience. Surely the audience are cheating themselves by being deliberately obtuse. I'm not saying you have to approve of drugs in sport, but that the moment you started watching MMA you surely must have realized exactly what you were seeing. This is a sport where a guy called Randy "the natural" Couture, won the heavy weight title weighing over 220lbs at 6ft 2", with a 6 pack!
Can't speak for everyone else but I came to the sport from a background of watching boxing (where PEDs don't seem to be much of an issue) didn't bother spending ages reading up on the history of MMA and don't know (or care) exactly how much muscle someone can pack on with/without taking steroids. I always assumed they were fighting on a level playing field. If not, it becomes a lot less interesting to me.