Celebrity Allegations, #MeToo etc

Its incredible just how powerful white and rich people are in Western countries so much so that actresses like Jolie and Paltrow don't speak out against them for the fear of repurcusions.
 
I'm not sure why any public figure not directly connected to Weinstein needs to comment on this, to be honest.

I agree to be honest. But to be fair there are a lot of people directly connected to Weinstein. I think they have to comment or else the "They're morally bankrupt!" crew will carry on criticising.

Its incredible just how powerful white and rich people are in Western countries so much so that actresses like Jolie and Paltrow don't speak out against them for the fear of repurcusions.
It really does show the power that Weinstein had, kind of remarkable but it shows how he has gotten away with it for so long.

On Clinton finally criticising Weinstein, good for her. I thought she might try and hire him as an advisor.
 
Clinton - and Obama, to be fair here - do have connections to Weinstein, though. He's raised millions of dollars for the pair of them, both directly and indirectly.

I'm not sure that gives them an obligation to comment on the latest news because otherwise, the notion that they condone his alleged actions has substance. The times we live in though.
 
First of all, I wasn't referring to 'comedians', as you called them. I don't give two hoots about their opinion on anything.

Secondly, yes, it is important for Clinton to comment on Weinstein because a) she claims to be a leading voice for feminists and feminist issues, and b) Weinstein, her and her family as a whole, have a long alliance. It's bizarre that it's taken them, what, six days to comment on a huge scandal involving a large donor to their political campaigns and an issue she claims to be passionate about. There's the problem here.

As always with these self-centred weasels, they try and see which way the bricks are falling before committing to a stance. It truly is repulsive
.

Late night hosts are comedians. Clinton put out a statement today sharply criticizing him, even though he raised money for her. She had a long alliance with Donald Trump.

As for your last line, isn't it true for everyone? I just don't see why you go on rambling about 'liberals'. Everybody is up for criticism, whether it's Obama, Clinton, Sanders or Trump.
 
All that was needed was for her to release that same statement a few days ago and it wouldn't have become a news story.

Meh, I don't think her being a few days late is that big a story. She's put out a statement now and the party has given his money away.

More damning is the silence from powerful men in Hollywood like Tarantino and David O'Russell who have worked with him multiple times. Michael Moore is currently working with him on a Trump documentary and has remained silent too. Then there's a story of how Russell Crowe and Matt Damon helped sink a negative story on Weinstein; neither have confirmed or denied that either.

The biggest male actor I've seen comment is Clooney; still waiting for the rest of 'em.
 
Late night hosts are comedians. Clinton put out a statement today sharply criticizing him, even though he raised money for her. She had a long alliance with Donald Trump.

As for your last line, isn't it true for everyone? I just don't see why you go on rambling about 'liberals'. Everybody is up for criticism, whether it's Obama, Clinton, Sanders or Trump.

Has he\she even mentioned 'liberals' once in this thread?
 
Clinton - and Obama, to be fair here - do have connections to Weinstein, though. He's raised millions of dollars for the pair of them, both directly and indirectly.

He's done plenty for them funding-wise but presuming they haven't known of anything he's done beforehand they're not particularly responsible or at fault for that. Any statements would, of course, be welcomed considering the pedigree of Obama and Clinton but I'm not sure it's completely necessary. Due to his status he's probably mingled with most big names at some point.
 
Meh, I don't think her being a few days late is that big a story. She's put out a statement now and the party has given his money away.

More damning is the silence from powerful men in Hollywood like Tarantino and David O'Russell who have worked with him multiple times. Michael Moore is currently working with him on a Trump documentary and has remained silent too. Then there's a story of how Russell Crowe and Matt Damon helped sink a negative story on Weinstein; neither have confirmed or denied that either.

The biggest male actor I've seen comment is Clooney; still waiting for the rest of 'em.

You do have to wonder if the reason they're being quiet is because they also have skeletons hidden in their closets or if Weinstein knows some damaging stuff about them and they dont want to get on his bad side.
 
Sorry I know most people in this thread seem to be more worried about who has or hasn't responded to this but shouldn't the overriding concern be that he's going to get away with it? This guy is clearly sick and should either be in a mental institution or in jail, that audio was harrowing.
 
It won't get to that, I think. Charges will need probable cause, which allegations on twitter don't amount to.
Surely that audio and the multiple testimonies should be enough to at least get to plead out?
 
Listening to that New Yorker Magazine audio is just sickening. What a vile piece of waste that man is.

If this was an open secret in Hollywood then some people need to be charged as well.

There's just something so...desperate about it. Incredible to see such insecurity from a man with so much fame and power. A common theme among plenty of big names, by the looks of it, but still...
 
You do have to wonder if the reason they're being quiet is because they also have skeletons hidden in their closets or if Weinstein knows some damaging stuff about them and they dont want to get on his bad side.

Part of me wonders if it's almost down to laziness among some. No doubt plenty of allegations fly around, some of them baseless and with little substance, and so some other powerful figures who aren't necessarily dodgy at all just tend to ignore them if they're only hearing rumours.
 
More on the Paltrow allegations, and Pitt confronting Weinstein.

 
Surely that audio and the multiple testimonies should be enough to at least get to plead out?

The audio was gathered through an investigation that fizzled out because of the accuser's background that would make her an unreliable witness in court. Plus Weinstein came to an out of court agreement with her afterwards, so I doubt she will be able to testify.

Other testimonies come down to him vs her. If there was concrete evidence I think he'd be in jail by now.
 
I'm not sure that gives them an obligation to comment on the latest news because otherwise, the notion that they condone his alleged actions has substance. The times we live in though.

Thing is a lot of these people comment and jump on the bandwagon for things unrelated to them, so they've made a rod for their own back. How can they continue to claim and lecture some sort of moral superiority to others if they turn a blind eye to this?
 
Anyone caught having smothered this story for over a decade deserves what they get - including (if true) the NY Times.
 
Last edited:
Part of me wonders if it's almost down to laziness among some. No doubt plenty of allegations fly around, some of them baseless and with little substance, and so some other powerful figures who aren't necessarily dodgy at all just tend to ignore them if they're only hearing rumours.

That's no excuse. They all have publicists/PR firms so its not like they themselves have to make an effort when they release a statement.
 
Reading some stuff that suggests the DA may have been paid off in exchange for not bringing charges.
 
DA Vance needs removing from office and put in jail.

This was the timeline for the Ivanka/Don Jr investigation which was shelved after he overruled his own prosecutors.

  • In January 2012, Kasowitz, Trump Sr.’s personal lawyer, donated $25,000 to Vance’s reelection campaign.
  • Then in May 2012, Kasowitz met Vance to ask him to drop the investigation. (Vance returned his donation before the meeting.)
  • In August 2012, Vance told his subordinates to drop the case. (“I did not at the time believe beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime had been committed,” he told the New Yorker team.)
  • In September 2012, Kasowitz planned a fundraiser for Vance, which was held a few months later and raised tens of thousands of dollars for him.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/4/16418766/ivanka-trump-donald-jr-indictment

Then this is released regarding Vance and a donation from Weintein's lawyer.

 
Last edited:
This DA needs removing from office and put in jail.

This was the timeline for the Ivanka/Don Jr investigation which was shelved.

  • In January 2012, Kasowitz, Trump Sr.’s personal lawyer, donated $25,000 to Vance’s reelection campaign.
  • Then in May 2012, Kasowitz met Vance to ask him to drop the investigation. (Vance returned his donation before the meeting.)
  • In August 2012, Vance told his subordinates to drop the case. (“I did not at the time believe beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime had been committed,” he told the New Yorker team.)
  • In September 2012, Kasowitz planned a fundraiser for Vance, which was held a few months later and raised tens of thousands of dollars for him.
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/10/4/16418766/ivanka-trump-donald-jr-indictment

Wrong thread?
 
Christ...



Aside from being a complete and utter scumbag, I'm often stunned by how little shame these creeps have.

Back in my days of asking girls out or attempting to chat them up, the first hint of rejection and I was gone! The idea of pushing and begging a girl who isn't interested or worse still, is totally repulsed by you, is so far from my idea of a good time I can't even process it.
 
That's no excuse. They all have publicists/PR firms so its not like they themselves have to make an effort when they release a statement.

Oh definitely not an excuse, just the reason why I suspect it happens. No doubt a lot of rumours and allegations fly around Hollywood and most big names choose to ignore them.
 
I saw late night comedians confront the allegations and generally berate Weinstein. Are you saying there is not enough outcry against Weinstein? It was liberal NYT that broke the story and is getting a lot of traction now.

Why is it late for Clinton to put out a statement? What do you think is a necessary reaction from the liberals?

It's not so much the liberal community's reaction now, although the fact that so many wait to jump on the condemnation bandwagon until the guy is dead in the water, and become a safe target, does them no particular credit, but their past history of embracing such a known scumbag for the sake of personal gain. It makes a mockery of their moral pretensions.
 
It's not so much the liberal community's reaction now, although the fact that so many wait to jump on the condemnation bandwagon until the guy is dead in the water, and become a safe target, does them no particular credit, but their past history of embracing such a known scumbag for the sake of personal gain. It makes a mockery of their moral pretensions.
I don't think that's a particularly "liberal" problem - the same happens every time a God-fearing conservative gets caught doing similar. People wax sanctimonious and claim they had no idea but we know that's not true.

For me, this speaks more to failures as humans in agreeing on right and wrong, rather than being an issue of politics. But it never gets played that way anymore.