Celebrity Allegations, #MeToo etc

I think @Buchan is taking a lot of flak for something for which I'm mainly responsible, politicizing the thread and turning it into a discussion about the nature of Hollywood liberalism. My apologies.
 
Which is why you need to give people time, both had worked with Weinstein and for all we know may have been directly harassed themselves. It may not be something they want to relive directly.

That's obviously a possibility, but they, along with many, many others, were very prompt to (rightfully) condemn deplorable actions of other sexual predators before. It just seems strange that they'd sit this one out when it's an issue they're obviously passionate about, and it also affects their own industry.

It's akin to a 'Kick It Out' advocate remaining silent on a racism issue in football. It's just bizarre.
 
Whenever something like this happens, I‘m stupid enough to think that, right before reading or entering discussions about such topics, that this is finally something everyone agrees on. Weinstein is an asshole, those who supported or helped him must be questioned and asked uncomfortable questions and the victims deserve recognition for speaking up.

It always ends up with a discussion about how it might also have been the women‘s fault. This is so damn infuriating.
 
That's obviously a possibility, but they, along with many, many others, were very prompt to (rightfully) condemn deplorable actions of other sexual predators before. It just seems strange that they'd sit this one out when it's an issue they're obviously passionate about, and it also affects their own industry.

It's akin to a 'Kick It Out' advocate remaining silent on a racism issue in football. It's just bizarre.

I honestly can't remember how quick they were to condemn every other famous sexual predator but maybe it was 5 days but seemed quicker to you back then. Either way given this time around it affected someone they knew directly, understandable if they took such a long time as a few days to get around for the public condemnation.

It's akin to a 'Kick It Out' advocate waiting a few days before condemning his team-mate or manager. That doesn't always happen, see Ashley Cole, so you have to commend it when it does.
 
It always ends up with a discussion about how it might also have been the women‘s fault. This is so damn infuriating.

It's never the woman's fault. However, wilfully turning a blind eye to grotesque deviancy as you're afraid it'll harm your career prospects, particularly when you claim to be a feminist and a voice for women and sexual assault victims, is a tough position to defend.
 
I honestly can't remember how quick they were to condemn every other famous sexual predator but maybe it was 5 days but seemed quicker to you back then. Either way given this time around it affected someone they knew directly, understandable if they took such a long time as a few days to get around for the public condemnation.

It's akin to a 'Kick It Out' advocate waiting a few days before condemning his team-mate or manager. That doesn't always happen, see Ashley Cole, so you have to commend it when it does.

That might be reasonable if news of this scandal landed in their breakfast cornflakes out of a clear, blue sky. But Harvey seems to have molested half the women in Hollywood. It didn't come as a surprise. Everybody had known for years.
 
It's never the woman's fault. However, wilfully turning a blind eye to grotesque deviancy as you're afraid it'll harm your career prospects, particularly when you claim to be a feminist and a voice for women and sexual assault victims, is a tough position to defend.
I think it‘s only a tough position to defend if you ignore the full amount of trouble those women might possibly face. To think this is just about their careers is pretty ignorant. For them, fighting a man like Harvey Weinstein, there is much more at stake. You just don‘t seem to even consider what going public or giving support could mean for them.

Add to that the possibility, maybe even likelihood that some of those women might have been affected themselves, thus it might not be easy for them to speak out.

While we‘re at it and in hopes you might gain a better understanding of the power disparity those women face, you should give the Twitter feed from Terry Crews a good read. If a man like him is that afraid, just think what a broken industry this must be and how a woman must feel, if a mountain of a man like Terry Crews feels so helpless.
 
That might be reasonable if news of this scandal landed in their breakfast cornflakes out of a clear, blue sky. But Harvey seems to have molested half the women in Hollywood. It didn't come as a surprise. Everybody had known for years.

Well that is an assumption. For all we know that might be the case, certainly a few actors have deemed so. Even so I don't think everyone knew the level of Weinstein's depravity such as the New Yorker audio. They have may have thought he was a creep but certainly not worth going up against given the amount of power he wields, particularly if they had no proof.
 
Terry Crews has come out and said he was groped by a male executive a while ago and that he refrained himself from lashing out at the guy.

Who the fecking feck gropes Terry Crews?
 
Terry Crews has come out and said he was groped by a male executive a while ago and that he refrained himself from lashing out at the guy.

Who the fecking feck gropes Terry Crews?
Imagine how much power these men must have to be capable of even thinking about groping a man as huge and strong like that. Imagine how confident and sure of their power people like these must be. The fact that this man was not afraid of groping Terry Crews is so telling.
And here in this thread we have people
 
Huge stars coming out and speaking now he’s completely fecked.

A list stars saying nothing for years though is worrying, Hollywood truly does have a dirty underbelly that even the biggest of actors are afraid to speak of, I bet there’s all sorts of shit happening behind closed doors.
 
Harvey Weinstein was and is an incredibly powerful man. He‘s connected to other incredibly important men. He has a shitload of money and he personally knows and befriended important politicians. Many politicians got donations from him. He knows many important journalists.
Also, he has dirt on many people. He controls the careers and public images of a shitload of people.
To suggest they had nothing to be afraid of is incredibly ignorant. At his very top, Weinstein could have easily crushed them with his influence. Just read the stories around him. Read how people like Matt Damon apparently helped to cover for him, or listen to the New Yorker tape and think about the fact, that this tape wasn’t enough to get him in front of a judge. Just think about the sheer amount of people relying on him who would have so much to lose if this comes out.
Jolie, Paltrow and all the others had so much to be afraid of and so little to gain by speaking out. And this doesn’t even include the difficulties and issues they would have had to face by going public. The media going crazy, the doubt they would have had to face, the uncertainty.
When you face an enemy so powerful and you get so little out of fighting him, it can be much easier to simply let go of it and try to move on. The struggle is just too much.
I think you’ve got this just about right here.

For those of you still trying to understand why people didn’t come forward before now (I’m not aware how or why this has suddenly come out)........

Try and imagine that you, whether male or female, work for a large, famous company and for some reason you are alone with the company’s male MD or CEO (the most senior person there is). Imagine he suddenly sexually assaulted you or started w...king in front of you. You’re disgusted and shaken up. You don’t know what on earth to do or say. You finally get away and still feel shaken and embarrassed. You talk to the person closest to you. They think you should do something about it.

So, what do you do?
 
Anyone caught having smothered this story for over a decade deserves what they get - including (if true) the NY Times.

Complete assholes for ignoring the story for a decade.

Rumors they pushed with the story last week to beat the New Yorker's Farrow piece.
 
I think you’ve got this just about right here.

For those of you still trying to understand why people didn’t come forward before now (I’m not aware how or why this has suddenly come out)........

Try and imagine that you, whether male or female, work for a large, famous company and for some reason you are alone with the company’s male MD or CEO (the most senior person there is). Imagine he suddenly sexually assaulted you or started w...king in front of you. You’re disgusted and shaken up. You don’t know what on earth to do or say. You finally get away and still feel shaken and embarrassed. You talk to the person closest to you. They think you should do something about it.

So, what do you do?

Quit...? Not an actor though, don't depend on "landing roles".
 
Hopefully some investigative journalists will dig deep into all this and uncover whats gone on. Will be a Pulitzer waiting for the ones who expose this network.
 
Last edited:
Just listened to the audio. Feck sake.
 
Last edited:
Now being reported NBC had the details on this in August and refused to publish :rolleyes:

They allowed Farrow to publish the story at another media outlet instead (New Yorker).
 
Last edited:
I think this is a good time to remind everyone that there's no way in hell Ronan Farrow isn't Frank Sinatra's son.
 
I think this is a good time to remind everyone that there's no way in hell Ronan Farrow isn't Frank Sinatra's son.
frank-sinatra-ronan-farrow-137843117237210401-131004170129.jpg


I don't know...
 
There are limits to truth-telling.

But the truth is that conservatism and liberalism don't represent opposing ends of the same continuum at all. They're completely different kinds of thing.

Like religious belief and atheism, where one is the absence of the other. Conservatives are the atheists, basing their ideas on human nature, common observation and commonsense. Liberalism is much more akin to a religion, whose devotees have to subscribe to numerous dogmas which are not deducible from reason or observation, but must be accepted on faith.

This makes a liberal someone the left side of whose brain doesn't know what the right side is thinking. In many ways, hypocrisy is both the cause and the consequence of liberalism. It certainly is its ever-present handmaiden.

I've read some crap in my time, but congratulations, because you've truly outdone yourself. This post is a special kind of stupid. The 'whatthefeckery?' on display here is quite outstanding. Take a bow.
 
@kps88
Apparently the management refused to act on allegations for months while various personalities (Jahns, Mundy) have refused to work with them for over a year due to the behind the scenes atmosphere.
I like the channel but they are funded by sponsors and not view counts. If this were Andy alone then fair enaugh but Screen Junkies itself is now in trouble for letting it happen.
Its a shame and I hope they survive but its looking like a toxic brand. Hopefully they branch out and start again, they'd be stupid not to
That explains why Nick left. Never did see a reason for that.
 
Terry Crews has come out and said he was groped by a male executive a while ago and that he refrained himself from lashing out at the guy.

Who the fecking feck gropes Terry Crews?

I got very aggressively hit on by our head of HR once. He was 6'4" and I'm not Terry Crews. Did not go well.
 
There are limits to truth-telling.

But the truth is that conservatism and liberalism don't represent opposing ends of the same continuum at all. They're completely different kinds of thing.

Like religious belief and atheism, where one is the absence of the other. Conservatives are the atheists, basing their ideas on human nature, common observation and commonsense. Liberalism is much more akin to a religion, whose devotees have to subscribe to numerous dogmas which are not deducible from reason or observation, but must be accepted on faith.

This makes a liberal someone the left side of whose brain doesn't know what the right side is thinking. In many ways, hypocrisy is both the cause and the consequence of liberalism. It certainly is its ever-present handmaiden.

I need to know how old you are before I even contemplate addressing that nonsense.
 
Late night hosts are comedians. Clinton put out a statement today sharply criticizing him, even though he raised money for her. She had a long alliance with Donald Trump.

As for your last line, isn't it true for everyone? I just don't see why you go on rambling about 'liberals'. Everybody is up for criticism, whether it's Obama, Clinton, Sanders or Trump.
He hates liberals even though he supposedly is one
 
Aside from being a complete and utter scumbag, I'm often stunned by how little shame these creeps have.
Back in my days of asking girls out or attempting to chat them up, the first hint of rejection and I was gone! The idea of pushing and begging a girl who isn't interested or worse still, is totally repulsed by you, is so far from my idea of a good time I can't even process it.

Likewise but there's so many guys like this. And guys like this are often operating on the misunderstanding that women who say "no" don't really mean it because all women, in these guys rather small minds, secretly want it. Add to this the power that this particular creep has and you've got an out of control sexual predator.

Jailtime required.
 
Rose McGowan is going in hard on Twitter. Jeff Bezos, the two Afflecks, Matt Damon... all in her firing line.
Just read up about Matt Damon, apparently he vouched for Fabrizio Lomardo which eventually led to an investigative piece on Lombardo being shelved. Sounds pretty bad but Damon says he never knew about the nature of the piece and only vouched for his personal interactions with Lombardo. The journalist, Sharon Waxman, confirmed what Matt Damon.

So if Jon Jonson's book rings true we should expect the tide to turn on Rose McGowan any day now.
 
Jolie and Paltrow are two of the biggest female Hollywood stars of the last couple of decades. I can understand a young actress looking for a big break being scared to publicly confront a wealthy and influential bully like Weinstein after his unwelcome advances, but those two have been around long enough and are big enough to do anything without fear of consequences. Why the feck have they been silent all these years? OK, they chose to keep their mouths shut because it helped their careers early on but afterwards, what prevented them from going public? Everybody's full of shit in this business.

Look at what they are alledging though. He had a quick grope when no one was looking and when they stopped him he moved on to his next target.

The casting couch idea has been famous for generations, and the idea that men, particularly ones who've just bought the meal, plied you with drinks, think they can try it on, is even older - and happens at all levels of society, and ranges from just a misunderstanding to an assault depending on how insistent the man is. It's not the basis of a court case, except one that might see the woman charged with libel and defamation.

Jolie herself says that she tried to warn others afterwards. The thing the women have going for them now, that makes it easier to come forward, is sheer weight of numbers. Up until that point, many will feel the weight of embarrassment, guilt, the sensation that somehow they invited it by being too friendly, too flirty. Some will even feel that in their attempt to sell only their talent, they did trip his response.

And that's before we even talk about the impact a man with power, money and clearly a whole network of influence could have had on their careers.
 
Look at what they are alledging though. He had a quick grope when no one was looking and when they stopped him he moved on to his next target.

The casting couch idea has been famous for generations, and the idea that men, particularly ones who've just bought the meal, plied you with drinks, think they can try it on, is even older - and happens at all levels of society, and ranges from just a misunderstanding to an assault depending on how insistent the man is. It's not the basis of a court case, except one that might see the woman charged with libel and defamation.

Jolie herself says that she tried to warn others afterwards. The thing the women have going for them now, that makes it easier to come forward, is sheer weight of numbers. Up until that point, many will feel the weight of embarrassment, guilt, the sensation that somehow they invited it by being too friendly, too flirty. Some will even feel that in their attempt to sell only their talent, they did trip his response.

And that's before we even talk about the impact a man with power, money and clearly a whole network of influence could have had on their careers.
And then those women see a guy like Cosby being accused by a shitload of women and he doesn‘t even go to jail. The victims have so little to gain and so much to lose here.
 
You misrepresent my opinions.

Oh great, the "don't believe your lying eyes" defence. Your posts are there for everyone to see and I can't be bothered to go through this again with you. I think most people in this thread have an idea of what's been going on. Even Buchan gets it.

You've clearly got a brain but people with such overt predilections for syllables, flowery prose and absurdly verbose contributions (DYSWIDT?) tend to be those who have insecurities about themselves and in particular their intellects. This might be you, this might not, but you really need to take your foot off the gas. By all means flex your vocabulary and entertain us with a delicious turn of phrase when appropriate but in general tone it down. Seriously. Less is more.

As for the following:

There are limits to truth-telling. But the truth is that conservatism and liberalism don't represent opposing ends of the same continuum at all. They're completely different kinds of thing. Like religious belief and atheism, where one is the absence of the other. Conservatives are the atheists, basing their ideas on human nature, common observation and commonsense. Liberalism is much more akin to a religion, whose devotees have to subscribe to numerous dogmas which are not deducible from reason or observation, but must be accepted on faith.

This makes a liberal someone the left side of whose brain doesn't know what the right side is thinking. In many ways, hypocrisy is both the cause and the consequence of liberalism. It certainly is its ever-present handmaiden.

You're either trolling like a trooper or are genuinely next level batshit crazy. If the former I've got some great news for you. At some point in the future you'll grow up a bit, mature, and realise you've wasted a lot of time. If the latter, and you really do have one arm in the straitjacket, then I heartily recommend you go and do some reading on John Anthony West and his theories on alternative history. You'll love it. He's the L Ron Hubbard of Egyptology.

Feel free to respond but I'm not going to be taking this thread off-track anymore. I'm done with pivots and partisan lenses. It's time to focus on the real issues this story raises.
 
Rose McGowen going mad on Twitter, told Affleck to feck off and branded him a liar saying he told her ''Goddammit I told you not to do that!'' about coming out with the accusations.

The scary part to me in all this is the amount of people who know about what's happening but aren't doing anything to stop it. Huge triple A mega stars keeping quiet while co workers are getting sexually assaulted and worse, it's fecking crazy.
 
That audio recording is worse than I expected. Horrible, manipulative beg of a guy. Don't want to imagine what he's like when he goes further.
 
Bit of a random contribution but I went on a tour of New Zealand on a bus in 1999. There was an English girl on that same bus who was travelling back to the Uk from the states having spent 6 months working as an assistant for Harvey Weinstein. She said she quit her job once she realised he was "an absolute pig of a man". Kind of wish I'd probed for more details. I just assumed he'd been rude to her. So there you go. That's a hell of a long time he's spent being nasty to women. What a cnut.