The First Redcafe Sheep Draft

It actually took the same amount of research to check 20 players for reds as it takes to check them for league reds (the most common, obviously). I seem to prefer smaller pools for some reason, particularly at this stage. Later on when you and others need specific positions these broader pools would be handy.

Let's see how it pans out though, it's all experimental after all.
I agree with this, I was surprised that we have such a huge player pool now.
 
It actually took the same amount of research to check 20 players for reds as it takes to check them for league reds (the most common, obviously). I seem to prefer smaller pools for some reason, particularly at this stage. Later on when you and others need specific positions these broader pools would be handy.

Let's see how it pans out though, it's all experimental after all.

You can say that now because you scared one of the managers away from Koeman with your open-book posts, you were heading for another block till late on in that pick. :p
 
I understand what you mean, smaller pools are much more likely to pay you off on a gamble as a lot of managers would stick to safe picks (just like we saw).
 
I understand what you mean, smaller pools are much more likely to pay you off on a gamble as a lot of managers would stick to safe picks (just like we saw).
I'm curious how the last round will affect the behaviour of the managers in the next rounds. More managers going for the big names? Or even less, thanks to reverse psychology? Pretty sure Antohan can share a few interesting concepts with us, what 'in theory' should happen now :lol:.
 
I'm willing to bet my life savings that a certain name will be blocked in the first pick of this round :lol:
 
You can say that now because you scared one of the managers away from Koeman with your open-book posts, you were heading for another block till late on in that pick. :p

Good to hear someone else rates him. But no, it has nothing to do with not having got a sheep there, I prefer the focus from narrower pools. I started listing who each manager may go for and ended up with a truckload for each, add them second-guessing themselves... got nowhere.

Speaking of Koeman, I have some question from @Pippa to get back to.
 
I understand what you mean, smaller pools are much more likely to pay you off on a gamble as a lot of managers would stick to safe picks (just like we saw).

Aye, exactly, this one has way too many great options and the deciding factor won't be quality or system (very little going by way of that), it will just be how each individual mind works. I think I have a rrived at who the top pick will be and it's by no means the obvious ones.
 
I'm curious how the last round will affect the behaviour of the managers in the next rounds. More managers going for the big names? Or even less, thanks to reverse psychology? Pretty sure Antohan can share a few interesting concepts with us, what 'in theory' should happen now :lol:.

Had there been less options I reckon the big name would have been toast, but there are far too many of them. I would expect a big name to slip through not because people avoided him but because far too many risk-takers wind up deciding on 1-2 other alternatives. Second round will be a mindfeck here.
 
@AldoPaine18 perhaps we should make the sheep process faster? Because I think we should know who we got as our sheep before the next round begins.
I think that makes sense, Aldo. The managers should know what sheep they have before they make their next pick, it might affect the pick. Let's say someone gets a leftback sheep and then picks a leftback and both are decided at the same time, the sheep now is useless and it's not the manager's fault. The sheeps should be decided at the latest 6 hours after the new criteria is out, so that the managers have more than enough time to plan with the sheeps. Might not be important now, but in the last 4 or 5 rounds it certainly is.
 
I think we should close round 1 by tonight. Seems pointless going into tomorrow. We can extend second round deadline to 24 hours if needed.
 
How many are left to pick @AldoPaine18 ?
4.

I think that makes sense, Aldo. The managers should know what sheep they have before they make their next pick, it might affect the pick. Let's say someone gets a leftback sheep and then picks a leftback and both are decided at the same time, the sheep now is useless and it's not the manager's fault. The sheeps should be decided at the latest 6 hours after the new criteria is out, so that the managers have more than enough time to plan with the sheeps. Might not be important now, but in the last 4 or 5 rounds it certainly is.
True.

We'll decide the sheep in next few hours, by evening, and from next time the sheep must be announced a minimum of 12 hours before the next round's first pick are announced, instead the same time.

I think we should close round 1 by tonight. Seems pointless going into tomorrow. We can extend second round deadline to 24 hours if needed.
Let's wait for everyone to submit first. We'll decide then.

You feckers are too impatient, though. :D
 
Accidentally broke my laptop screen yesterday night, currently using my littler brothers one, sorry to you lot if i've delayed anything, if i can still get involved that would be mint, otherwise i understand if its to late.
 
Accidentally broke my laptop screen yesterday night, currently using my littler brothers one, sorry to you lot if i've delayed anything, if i can still get involved that would be mint, otherwise i understand if its to late.

Plenty of time for your pick.....but I recommend you doing it ASAP..... :drool::wenger:
 
Accidentally broke my laptop screen yesterday night, currently using my littler brothers one, sorry to you lot if i've delayed anything, if i can still get involved that would be mint, otherwise i understand if its to late.
Only 10 mins left to deadline
 
Say, @antohan, what year do you think was Koeman's best? I have no knowledge of him playing in Holland, but you seem to rate him highly based on his time in La Liga.
Are you rating his defending ability that highly, or is it more of the overall package that he provides to a team?

It's more the overall package of course. We talk a lot about ball-playing defenders and if they can put a pass here or there every now and then they suddenly become different from a stopper. Koeman was miles ahead though, his passing was just from a different planet as far as defenders are concerned, and I mean ball-playing ones. It wasn't just the ease with which he could spray pinpoint passes all over the pitch but his football brain overall, which made them sublime, incisive and devastating.

I rate him higher as a defender and defence leader from his days with PSV and in a back four, the back threes Cruyff deployed left him far too exposed at times to pacey strikers playing off the shoulder (not his strength, which is where a defensive partner would help). When Barca played four at the back it was largely the other chap doing the heavy-lifting, but then his qualities and contribution to the buildup could be exploited to their full extent without them entailing such a significant risk.

I'm not too sure what was best though, the back three or four. The risk of having him solo doing everything was still worth taking considering how much he contributed to the side overall, the extra man elsewhere, and how it forced opponents to leave space between the lines or be punished by a ball over the top (which invariably happened when they inevitably fell behind anyway and had to push up!). It did occasionally lead to open goalfests though, but I still enjoyed those as most times the Dream Team had more in their locker to come up top.

It's a difficult one to manage, particularly with how erratic the picking of partners and the rest of the side is bound to be, but I've wanted to have a go for some time now. If I were facing a Romario type you sure would want to see someone next to him, no question, but how often do you face someone like that? That's one issue with drafts and rating players in the real-world vs. in drafts. He may not be ideal for multi-era things like this when the striker pool is much more impressive than in your average league/CL season, but in the real world where what you really want is to establish your dominance and make your superiority count every week against 80-90% of the sides, why on earth would you worry and get him a partner?
 
Yeah Koeman was an exceptional passer. Much of Barcelona's game pivoted around his delivery. The calibre of footballer you'd want to build a team around and the sort of defender whose weaknesses you'd want to compensate for.
 
Have the sheep been picked? I will not be picking without knowing my sheep. Also, this is sully's pick and he isn't online.
 
I thought Jbezia was going to assign sheeps? What happened to that? Why was that change made if it was not going to be followed anyway?
 
And I am not taking a striker since Antohan cried out of having Heskey as well. Give me a midfielder too
 
I thought Jbezia was going to assign sheeps? What happened to that? Why was that change made if it was not going to be followed anyway?
He was but he hasn't showed up for hours. So for this round I'm doing it. It's fair that you guys know the sheep before you have to submit the next round's picks.
 
Anyone has an issue with the position of the player they have, let me know asap

Edit : Before the Round 3 Pick 1 is announced. No changes after that.
 
I thought Jbezia was going to assign sheeps? What happened to that? Why was that change made if it was not going to be followed anyway?

But, but, you vetoed his appointment :p

@sullydnl and @NM - António Pacheco (left winger)

Problem with that is he could be mistaken for Antonio Pacheco, who was/is in fact quite a decent player. Seeing as sully/NM were hellbent on van Basten or Sheva it would be fitting that they get Juary to spearhead their attack, seeing as crappy isn't having him.
 
First time I'm hearing about my RB.. can anyone tell me something about this fella? Besides the fact that he scored a penalty shootout against Liverpool?
He's wiki page is insulting :D

8 caps man! For Italy in the 80s? I'd say the best of the lot. Proper average, nothing distinct about him really.
 
But, but, you vetoed his appointment :p



Problem with that is he could be mistaken for Antonio Pacheco, who was/is in fact quite a decent player. Seeing as sully/NM were hellbent on van Basten or Sheva it would be fitting that they get Juary to spearhead their attack, seeing as crappy isn't having him.

Is that (another) veto?