antohan
gets aroused by tagline boobs
I got a good one for the nations.
The Austrian?
I got a good one for the nations.
There's a sound pick at this stage.
The Austrian?
I wanted Cech, completely missed that he was picked, so went with Friedel as he was the first name that came to mind then. I thought I would be getting him for outside FIFA top 30 as well as non league winner but didn't notice that USA was in top 30. After the whole drama about changing picks, I didn't want to start all that again so stuck with him. I don't really have any keepers who didn't play in Europe in mind at the moment though, maybe I am forgetting a glaring name or something.Why on earth didn't you use that for the keeper? There's at least 5 at Friedel's level or better and it's not like there's great outfield players to every upgrade on it. Non-league winner is much better.
I wanted Cech, completely missed that he was picked, so went with Friedel as he was the first name that came to mind then. I thought I would be getting him for outside FIFA top 30 as well as non league winner but didn't notice that USA was in top 30. After the whole drama about changing picks, I didn't want to start all that again so stuck with him. I don't really have any keepers who didn't play in Europe in mind at the moment though, maybe I am forgetting a glaring name or something.
Don't think so. At least not someone who'd be an upgrade on Friedel - who is an excellent keeper in my book.
So, isn't someone supposed to be doing something here, like picking a player or something?
I can fulfill that non Europe one with a sub, so I will have all 12 and I don't have to play him, right?I'd agree Friedel is fine, but there are 4-5 who were as good if not better and the point is you don't want to be stuck with that criterion being used for an outfield player. For example, as good a pick as Le Tissier is in that regard, you don't want to be stuck with building a team around him throughout this, do you?
I can fulfill that non Europe one with a sub, so I will have all 12 and I don't have to play him, right?
As far as I know, the 12 we pick now need to have satisfied all 12 criteria, and in future as long as we have 12 players who are satisfying all 12 categories in the squad, we can field whoever we want.
I'd agree Friedel is fine, but there are 4-5 who were as good if not better and the point is you don't want to be stuck with that criterion being used for an outfield player. For example, as good a pick as Le Tissier is in that regard, you don't want to be stuck with building a team around him throughout this, do you?
I think I asked this before but missed/didn't get an answer. How do reinforcements work? Do 1st round winners get to add a player as long as we still fit the 12 criteria, or is it more flexible?
Once we pick 12 players and satisfy all 12 criteria with 12 different players, then I don't see how we can go from that to not satisfying any of the criterion with a unique player in the squad unless you do trades. If you are simply adding players, you are free to do what you want with them.I think I asked this before but missed/didn't get an answer. How do reinforcements work? Do 1st round winners get to add a player as long as we still fit the 12 criteria, or is it more flexible?
Yes, I asked NM and Snow to go ahead and skip me as I literally don't have anyone in mind right now and I don't want to hold up the draft. Snow also didn't want to pick so my turn continued, which ended a while ago. Right now we are into NM and Snow's turn and they have 5 hours left.Look, @Aldo - it's you turn, ain't it? You're still on 11 players as far as I can tell. Is there some sort of misunderstanding here?
Yes, I asked NM and Snow to go ahead and skip me as I literally don't have anyone in mind right now and I don't want to hold up the draft. Snow also didn't want to pick so my turn continued, which ended a while ago. Right now we are into NM and Snow's turn and they have 5 hours left.
No I will pick it by this evening, I just don't know who to pick so I will pick it later when I find an option. The others are free to continue picking as per the order.So you have forfeited your pick, then - is that what you're saying?
But I am not sure if I am correct. @rpitroda is it okay that you pick a player for example a Ballon D'or winner, and replace a non league or non europe player in the Starting 11 with him for the next game. That way your squad still has all 12 criteria ticked. But the starting 11 has two players who are satisfying the same criterion.
But I am not sure if I am correct. @rpitroda is it okay that you pick a player for example a Ballon D'or winner, and replace a non league or non europe player in the Starting 11 with him for the next game. That way your squad still has all 12 criteria ticked. But the starting 11 has two players who are satisfying the same criterion.
I'd agree Friedel is fine, but there are 4-5 who were as good if not better and the point is you don't want to be stuck with that criterion being used for an outfield player. For example, as good a pick as Le Tissier is in that regard, you don't want to be stuck with building a team around him throughout this, do you?
What's with the Gary Kelly hate, h wasn't that bad, was he?
Not old enough to remember him properly, but he was on two team of the years.
Mainly looking at @antohan here.
But I am not sure if I am correct. @rpitroda is it okay that you pick a player for example a Ballon D'or winner, and replace a non league or non europe player in the Starting 11 with him for the next game. That way your squad still has all 12 criteria ticked. But the starting 11 has two players who are satisfying the same criterion.
I know it's supposed to be tricky mate, it doesn't bother me and I'm not too invested in this draft anyway.
FWIW I think the draft is hard enough without the one pick limit. The requirement to maintain 11/12 criteria on the pitch after reinforcements stops super teams from being created anyway - that aim is already achieved - so I don't think limiting upgrades to one pick is necessary there.
The difficulty is already maintained by keeping the criteria rules.
If the decision was made to do what Aldo asked about - I.e. Drop the strict criteria requirements after upgrades, then limiting upgrades to one pick would be necessary to keep things from going overboard.
As it is, considering everyone must field an XI which meets the tough limitations I don't think you will see any super teams being formed. It's too hard within the limits of the criteria.
IMO you could increase the number of upgrades to two or three, which would still stop amazing teams from forming, but which would allow people more flexibility when upgrading their team
I am not for changing the reinforcement number at all I think it was one of the hardest criterias to follow.
I have based all my drafting on that specific rule and I am sure there are more who did that considering how difficult it would be.
I'm not sure I follow you, mate - elaborate!
You've based your drafting on your opponents not being able to reinforce with more than one player per round? That sounds scarily advanced.
Fair points. It's a danger here, clearly, that upgrading/changing your team becomes too difficult. And that inevitably equals a loss of freshness/interest as the game progresses. I see nothing wrong with expanding the number of upgrades, really - the limitations will be there to check the formation of super teams, as you say.