phelans shorts
Full Member
It's definitely a reflection of how we have been run in recent years, that a club of United's size needs an external consultant to point this stuff out. It's actually quite a canny business idea, because I imagine there's lots of clubs within the pyramid that could benefit from this kind of input on a consultancy basis - but a club like United should already have all of this in order.
To be fair, I’d argue that a club like United should regularly audit stuff like this. Maybe internally audit it annually and externally every 5 years say. We’ve clearly been an off field mess for years so all these marginal gains can have a huge impact.
What does Fletcher do?
If what has been reported is true, his number one remit is to help academy players transition into the first team squad.
He’s worked at other clubs. Maybe it’s him that’s realised United are bad in the pastoral field, and need to improve?
It definitely could be his initiative or recommendation (or he just said we should look at this and Murtough has gone above and beyond in line with the total revamp) as you mention, a chunk of this certainly seems to be within his alleged remit.
That with Luke Shaw is totally believable. Probably to this day as well, would explain a lot.
At City and Pool, you imagine everything is in place and professional in and around football matters, so players only need to work and perform.
I have a feeling we leave the players all the freedom in the world, as nobody cared when Fergie was here as it worked and the man was all in one. The players need to be much more micromanaged and looked after, they just do whatever they want, on and off the pitch.
I can’t agree with the last part of this (I certainly don’t think the Shaw thing is true any more at least, there were plenty of murmurs around him and his mates when he first joined even if not quite as that post mentioned) but some people work better without micromanaging. The problem is we’ve had a one size fits all approach which hasn’t fit the majority.