- Joined
- Nov 19, 2009
- Messages
- 58,953
Cut out the insults, it's frankly tedious.Ole out bellends not a bad game that really was it? Give the guy the tools he l get results
Cut out the insults, it's frankly tedious.Ole out bellends not a bad game that really was it? Give the guy the tools he l get results
You really believe that's true?Well, nice from you to defend a fellow poster and @dove maaaybe overreacted with word "idiot"( prick or twat is the right word imo) but dr.@Crustanoid in his posts repeatedly talks shit and insults everybody who doesn't think like him. So action = reaction.
"Ole out" brigade doesn't insult people. We are classy bunch
Proves he doesn't know what "literally" means.
c. colloquial. Used to indicate that some (frequently conventional) metaphorical or hyperbolical expression is to be taken in the strongest admissible sense: ‘virtually, as good as’; (also) ‘completely, utterly, absolutely’.Now one of the most common uses, although often considered irregular in standard English since it reverses the original sense of literally (‘not figuratively or metaphorically’).
I'm pretty sick of this argument. Di Matteo WON Chelsea a champions league. When did this become an accurate measure of a good manager?
If Spurs did actually play exciting football or play top teams off the park rm17 route to the CL Final maybe this wouldn't be so meaningless, but actually they were lucky not to go out in the group stage, lucky in every knockout round. Produced the most timid final performance I've ever seen. Meanwhile their football has been tedious for a long time now.
The obsession with him on here is pathetic. It's based on utter nonsense.
Ha ha. I nearly respond it but then i realised there is no point. He will see what Poch can do with this team next season
Yes. Look at posts in all Ole threads. Most of posts from us( there are always some bad examples of course) are about Ole and Ole only.You really believe that's true?
It's based on feelings.
He was managing Spurs though? How else should we be measuring him? He did incredibly well with the resources available to him, and I think it's pretty reductionist to merely boil his tenure down to "qualifying for the CL and winning nothing". At worst it's doing Poch a massive disservice, at best just willfully ignoring the progress they made under him. He turned them from laughing stock into Champions League finalists, whilst being heavily outspent by clubs either side of him. He built a great side, and although it ran out of steam last season, I don't think it takes a lot to acknowledge what he achieved there, even if it didn't manifest in silverware.It's based on nonsense. Pochettino was only a success at Spurs, by Spurs measure of expectations. Qualifying for the CL and winning nothing. By United's measure of expectations he would have been a failure.
Ole took over United last season and in the games he was in charge produced form that would have had them 3rd and a long way ahead of 4th. This season he's started building a team and remains well in the hunt for 4th and still in every competition United entered. This is what makes the Pochettino cult so deluded, because IF you were to judge Ole by the same standards you have to judge Pochettino to consider him succesful, then you also HAVE to conclude that Ole isn't actually doing a bad job. Definitely not a bad enough one to consider turfing him out. He's doing no worse than you could reasonably expect from Pochettino. Either that or you have to adopt complete double standards, or just reinvent reality, to reach a different conclusion..
Hence where the strawman CL final argument comes from. Only, the best team Spurs beat on route to that was City, and they didn't deserve to, and if you go back through the CL you find it's littered with teams who got to semi finals, finals, etc. even won it, despite having managers who'd definitely not be in the class people claim getting to a CL final puts Pochettino in. At this point it's deliberate ignorance/making things up to suit, as this is just a fact. Last time we won the CL the team we played in the final was managed by Avram fecking Grant.
Here is the problem; pretending Pochettino has done much better than he has, wont magically make it true if he becomes our manager. Pretending that when Ole beats City away it's a fluke and when Pochettino beats City away it's genius, doesn't change the results of any games.
This shite really seriously needs to stop. It's embarassing.
It's based on feelings.
Traditionally yes, although he defintion of literally changed a few years ago as so many people were using it like that, when speaking figuratively. I blame Jamie Redknapp.
The original meaning is still there, but they added a colloquial section to also include the times when people don't mean that:
https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/109061
Merriam-Webster did it too.
Literally literally doesn't just mean literally now.
Ole out bellends not a bad game that really was it? Give the guy the tools he l get results
I’d love to know how many Ole Outs are post 93 ‘fans’
Yes, and actually, don’t call me an idiot please. I can guarantee I’m more intelligent than most (doctorally educated, and world leading in my field)
Ha ha. I nearly respond it but then i realised there is no point. He will see what Poch can do with this team next season
Yeah there's really no point in trying to debate, if some are gonna think that Ole is better than Poch. Poch could do very well at his next team, while we continue looming in mediocrity again next season, and there will still be more excuses for Ole. A truly tiresome bunch.
Yeah there's really no point in trying to debate, if some are gonna think that Ole is better than Poch. Poch could do very well at his next team, while we continue looming in mediocrity again next season, and there will still be more excuses for Ole. A truly tiresome bunch.
Why do you only see life in black and white? There are many colors.
You don't have to think Ole is the best. Actually, he is not. Klopp is legit better, and Pep has more experience. So what? That doesn't mean Ole is the worst and should be sacked. He doesn't need to be the best or the worst. He is improving the team and bringing positivity in. Let him do his job. I bet you are not the absolute best at your job either, probably good enough, but they are not firing you, I hope?
It is indeed a trait of small and shitty teams to change managers all the time. We shouldnt be sacking Ole unless he is doing something irreversibly terrible, which he is not. That is the fecking point here, not that Ole is the best ever. Why is this so hard to understand?
This is pretty much where I am at with Ole. Do I think he is the greatest tactical brain of all time? No. But then again, in modern football you have a team of analysts and coaches to help here.
Ole has made several decisions that where brave and that I like. We’ve fielded 10 of the 20 youngest XIs in the league this year which can only bode well for the future. We’ve had a turbulent few years, Ole is trying to put the fundamentals back in place. Let’s let him do that for a year or so longer and if we’re still not looking like at least challenging for 3rd then we think about a new manager take us to the next level
I just don’t understand why the rush and all the venom from the Ole out posters. I feel he is getting all the abuse for 6/7 years of frustration tbh.
I’ve cross referenced a few of the more vocal “Ole out” posters with other threads. I then compared them with people who are vocally Ole in.
Ole out posters are 301% more likely to post in the FIFA and Football Manager threads.
Ole out posters are 50% more active in the transfer forum. This rises to 87% if you look at the Sancho thread. 103% if you are only looking at posts where they post potential lineups for next year with guesses at how much those players will cost.
Ole in posters are on average writing posts with 204% high level vocabulary compared to the average Ole out poster.
This is where it gets really interesting - Ole out posters are 50% more likely to listen to Jordan Peterson, play Mario games and are 105% more likely to be a virgin.
The thread is still in heated discussion.
I came into conclusion:
Ole In: Delusional, clueless, accepting mediocrity, no ambition.
Ole out: We know what's best for the club because we can see it that others can't.
No point in arguing.
So I'll just sit down here and read this shit show.
I’ve cross referenced a few of the more vocal “Ole out” posters with other threads. I then compared them with people who are vocally Ole in.
Ole out posters are 301% more likely to post in the FIFA and Football Manager threads.
Ole out posters are 50% more active in the transfer forum. This rises to 87% if you look at the Sancho thread. 103% if you are only looking at posts where they post potential lineups for next year with guesses at how much those players will cost.
Ole in posters are on average writing posts with 204% high level vocabulary compared to the average Ole out poster.
This is where it gets really interesting - Ole out posters are 50% more likely to listen to Jordan Peterson, play Mario games and are 105% more likely to be a virgin.
I'm pretty sick of this argument. Di Matteo WON Chelsea a champions league. When did this become an accurate measure of a good manager?
If Spurs did actually play exciting football or play top teams off the park rm17 route to the CL Final maybe this wouldn't be so meaningless, but actually they were lucky not to go out in the group stage, lucky in every knockout round. Produced the most timid final performance I've ever seen. Meanwhile their football has been tedious for a long time now.
The obsession with him on here is pathetic. It's based on utter nonsense.
I just don’t understand why the rush and all the venom from the Ole out posters. I feel he is getting all the abuse for 6/7 years of frustration tbh.
I’ve cross referenced a few of the more vocal “Ole out” posters with other threads. I then compared them with people who are vocally Ole in.
Ha ha. I nearly respond it but then i realised there is no point. He will see what Poch can do with this team next season
Spot on and Ole out posters are 900% more likely to be supporting Liverpool or Man City next season
Its interesting how everyone seemed to choose a 'side' so early on but still we have the same debate after every match. We are presented with masses of new data every single week and yet nobody changes their stance. It's such a pointless debate because nobody here actually believes the club are going to fire him, so accept it and get behind the team.
We are performing exactly how any neutral would expect us to given the thinness of our squad and the lack of experience overall. We are inconsistent. We make horrendous individual errors that cost us points. We cant put a run of results together. Brilliant one week, hopeless the next. None of this should come as a shock.
As a fanbase we are saying what exactly? Fire the manager because he isn't of sufficiently stunning quality to elevate this squad above what it so obviously is? Replace him with someone else who also isn't just because change must always equal good?
It's the plan that is the most important part of this, not who is executing it. I'm backing Ole 100% because he believes in the plan and is seeing it through and making the right decisions to take that to the next phase. There is no guarantee that the next one would.
Spot on and Ole out posters are 900% more likely to be supporting Liverpool or Man City next season
Its interesting how everyone seemed to choose a 'side' so early on but still we have the same debate after every match. We are presented with masses of new data every single week and yet nobody changes their stance. It's such a pointless debate because nobody here actually believes the club are going to fire him, so accept it and get behind the team.
We are performing exactly how any neutral would expect us to given the thinness of our squad and the lack of experience overall. We are inconsistent. We make horrendous individual errors that cost us points. We cant put a run of results together. Brilliant one week, hopeless the next. None of this should come as a shock.
As a fanbase we are saying what exactly? Fire the manager because he isn't of sufficiently stunning quality to elevate this squad above what it so obviously is? Replace him with someone else who also isn't just because change must always equal good?
It's the plan that is the most important part of this, not who is executing it. I'm backing Ole 100% because he believes in the plan and is seeing it through and making the right decisions to take that to the next phase. There is no guarantee that the next one would.
Its interesting how everyone seemed to choose a 'side' so early on but still we have the same debate after every match. We are presented with masses of new data every single week and yet nobody changes their stance. It's such a pointless debate because nobody here actually believes the club are going to fire him, so accept it and get behind the team.
We are performing exactly how any neutral would expect us to given the thinness of our squad and the lack of experience overall. We are inconsistent. We make horrendous individual errors that cost us points. We cant put a run of results together. Brilliant one week, hopeless the next. None of this should come as a shock.
As a fanbase we are saying what exactly? Fire the manager because he isn't of sufficiently stunning quality to elevate this squad above what it so obviously is? Replace him with someone else who also isn't just because change must always equal good?
It's the plan that is the most important part of this, not who is executing it. I'm backing Ole 100% because he believes in the plan and is seeing it through and making the right decisions to take that to the next phase. There is no guarantee that the next one would.
Disagree 100%. A better manager would have us much higher up the table with us vying for Chelsea & Spurs all the way.
Well you and I are at opposite ends of the spectrum on this so no surprise you disagree. Its an easy position for you to have though since there is no way to prove or disprove it. Its nowhere close to being as straightforward as 'I think X is a better manager than Ole and he would definitely have delivered better results with the same set of cards'.
Its interesting how everyone seemed to choose a 'side' so early on but still we have the same debate after every match. We are presented with masses of new data every single week and yet nobody changes their stance. It's such a pointless debate because nobody here actually believes the club are going to fire him, so accept it and get behind the team.
We are performing exactly how any neutral would expect us to given the thinness of our squad and the lack of experience overall. We are inconsistent. We make horrendous individual errors that cost us points. We cant put a run of results together. Brilliant one week, hopeless the next. None of this should come as a shock.
As a fanbase we are saying what exactly? Fire the manager because he isn't of sufficiently stunning quality to elevate this squad above what it so obviously is? Replace him with someone else who also isn't just because change must always equal good?
It's the plan that is the most important part of this, not who is executing it. I'm backing Ole 100% because he believes in the plan and is seeing it through and making the right decisions to take that to the next phase. There is no guarantee that the next one would.
its more of an easy position for you to say ‘ well it isn’t going to get any better & Ole is best person for it’ it’s also kinda defeatist.
There are much better managers out there so I feel like our ambition is seeping out of our club