Tennis Thread 2014

Wow. The quality is absurd. Going back to the debate we were having earlier, Kvitova is going the get the same prize money as one of these guys. :lol:
 
Nadal's a cool guy, very humble and as your say he is a beast on court.

I just don't like his bullish style - give me technique, touch and Federer's grace over power and athleticism anyday,
Exactly how I feel. Nadal may be the best athlete on the history of tennis, but Federer had a superior technique. Also, Fed was the master of all courts, Nadal was more specialized on court. Still fantastic players and both will go in history as the best ever players.
 
Wow. The quality is absurd. Going back to the debate we were having earlier, Kvitova is going the get the same prize money as one of these guys. :lol:

Ridiculous.
 
Wow. The quality is absurd. Going back to the debate we were having earlier, Kvitova is going the get the same prize money as one of these guys. :lol:

Small solace: In 50 years, nobody will know who Kvitova is.
 
Wow. The quality is absurd. Going back to the debate we were having earlier, Kvitova is going the get the same prize money as one of these guys. :lol:

Yeah - I get where Raoul is coming from and it doesn't bother me, but it seems a bit of a PC decision than an objective one.
 
Exactly how I feel. Nadal may be the best athlete on the history of tennis, but Federer had a superior technique. Also, Fed was the master of all courts, Nadal was more specialized on court. Still fantastic players and both will go in history as the best ever players.

I'm not sure if 9 wins on clay is any worse than 7 wins on grass. Not to mention that Nadal was the first to beat Federer on every surface before the other way round (which I'm still not sure has ever happened; I don't think Federer has ever been Rafa on clay).
 
Wow. The quality is absurd. Going back to the debate we were having earlier, Kvitova is going the get the same prize money as one of these guys. :lol:
That is really ridiculous.
 
He can be into his fashion as much as he likes, I'd just prefer it to have a bit more humility!

And what isn't humble about engraving your own initials in gold on everything available!!?!?! :nervous:
 
I don't know why they don't just make women play 5 sets. Surely in this era there's no doubt that female athletes are physically capable of playing for longer and tbf to the women's tennis, how many 'classics' can you really get over 3 sets? Pretty much all the great men's games have been 5 setters.
 
Novak won that point after falling over! Incredible! He's right back in this, if not the favourite again.
 
I'm not sure if 9 wins on clay is any worse than 7 wins on grass. Not to mention that Nadal was the first to beat Federer on every surface before the other way round (which I'm still not sure has ever happened; I don't think Federer has ever been Rafa on clay).
9 out of 14 (64%) compared to 7 out of 17 (41%) is a big difference IMO.
 
I'm not sure if 9 wins on clay is any worse than 7 wins on grass. Not to mention that Nadal was the first to beat Federer on every surface before the other way round (which I'm still not sure has ever happened; I don't think Federer has ever been Rafa on clay).

I think he's beaten him a couple of times, but not in the French Open and Nadal's obviously dominated him on clay.
 
I don't know why they don't just make women play 5 sets. Surely in this era there's no doubt that female athletes are physically capable of playing for longer and tbf to the women's tennis, how many 'classics' can you really get over 3 sets? Pretty much all the great men's games have been 5 setters.

Tbf, women's tennis is shit.
 
Exactly how I feel. Nadal may be the best athlete on the history of tennis, but Federer had a superior technique. Also, Fed was the master of all courts, Nadal was more specialized on court. Still fantastic players and both will go in history as the best ever players.

Nadal has two wimbledon titles and his dominance on clay isn't that different to Federer's dominance on grass.
 
I don't know why they don't just make women play 5 sets. Surely in this era there's no doubt that female athletes are physically capable of playing for longer and tbf to the women's tennis, how many 'classics' can you really get over 3 sets? Pretty much all the great men's games have been 5 setters.

Actually the trend is to eliminate the 3 out of 5 format from the men's side, mainly to avoid injuries and prolong careers.
 
All of the big four come across as humble IMO.
Ya, I actually agree with that. It's quite refreshing to see in modern sports with such global superstars.
 
I'm not sure if 9 wins on clay is any worse than 7 wins on grass. Not to mention that Nadal was the first to beat Federer on every surface before the other way round (which I'm still not sure has ever happened; I don't think Federer has ever been Rafa on clay).

Not in a grandslam. He has beaten him on clay though.
 
Think Feds legs are gone a bit, footwork is bad atm.
 
That was a huge forehand to Fed's backhand there.
 
And Djokovic wins. Happy for him, needed that. Great final.
 
Federer bottles it at the end. Six unforced errors in a row. That match really ended with a whimper.
 
So glad the "injury" didn't bother him...

So fecking gutted. feck this day. feck tennis. I'll drown myself in alcohol now.