Jazz
Just in case anyone missed it. I don't like Mount.
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2014
- Messages
- 31,372
Great to see Novak's family there congratulating Carlos. Classy.
Two of those wins Carlos had physical problems (the usual cramps).Sinner is absolutely a challenge for him. If I'm not mistaken he is 3-3 in h2h
I'm just going off actually performances and showings to be fair. There's not much to even suggest Becker's in the discussion other than piss easy runs at Wimbledon, he didn't have to face the elites before him - McEnroe, Borg or Connors - and has very little to suggest he was truly elite just yet away from grass. Alcaraz is genuinely truly elite on all forms already, neither of Nadal or Becker were quite there.
Sinner is absolutely a challenge for him. If I'm not mistaken he is 3-3 in h2h
Difficult to predict but I'd be surprised if he doesn't win more than 10.Alcaraz has basically saved men’s tennis as far as I’m concerned. That was already the case before today’s final, and he just further confirmed that here.
He is a joy to watch, with his style, variety and those drop shots. He has now won all 8 ‘big’ finals that he has appeared in so far during his career (including Barcelona which more important than Madrid for many Spanish players).
I wonder how many grand slams he will end up with.
Definitely. The only one worthy of the crown.Alcaraz has basically saved men’s tennis as far as I’m concerned. That was already the case before today’s final, and he just further confirmed that here.
He is a joy to watch, with his style, variety and those drop shots. He has now won all 8 ‘big’ finals that he has appeared in so far during his career (including Barcelona which more important than Madrid for many Spanish players).
I wonder how many grand slams he will end up with.
If he can continue his potential without hard injuries or something else like an early retire, I think he will definitely have over 10+ grand slams. 20+, I don't know, it's a really difficult task to achieve but the situation happened to Djokovic before people don't think that he would get 20+ slams. At the moment, we know what Djoko has achieved in recent years.Alcaraz has basically saved men’s tennis as far as I’m concerned. That was already the case before today’s final, and he just further confirmed that here.
He is a joy to watch, with his style, variety and those drop shots. He has now won all 8 ‘big’ finals that he has appeared in so far during his career (including Barcelona which more important than Madrid for many Spanish players).
I wonder how many grand slams he will end up with.
Stars don't seem to show up that frequently if the last decade is anything to go by. Since Djoko and Nadal emerged, I don't think we've seen one truly special talent that looked like he could challenge. If Carlos can have Novak out of the way soon, I think the guy can quite easily average 2 Slams a year for a good 6-7 years Atleast unless his body gives way. Novak is the only better player than him right now. The others aren't even close.Alcaraz has basically saved men’s tennis as far as I’m concerned. That was already the case before today’s final, and he just further confirmed that here.
He is a joy to watch, with his style, variety and those drop shots. He has now won all 8 ‘big’ finals that he has appeared in so far during his career (including Barcelona which more important than Madrid for many Spanish players).
I wonder how many grand slams he will end up with.
Being elite on all surfaces in 2023 is a totally different prospect to being elite on all surfaces in the 1980s. I don't think such a player even existed back then, such was the disparity.I'm just going off actually performances and showings to be fair. There's not much to even suggest Becker's in the discussion other than piss easy runs at Wimbledon, he didn't have to face the elites before him - McEnroe, Borg or Connors - and has very little to suggest he was truly elite just yet away from grass. Alcaraz is genuinely truly elite on all forms already, neither of Nadal or Becker were quite there.
As of right now we can say that he can win 20+. One of the biggest drivers of big trophies in Tennis is the quality of competition. Novak is 36 and will be gone soon and none of the next gen are remotely close. The only competition as it stands after Novak is his body.Alcaraz has basically saved men’s tennis as far as I’m concerned. That was already the case before today’s final, and he just further confirmed that here.
He is a joy to watch, with his style, variety and those drop shots. He has now won all 8 ‘big’ finals that he has appeared in so far during his career (including Barcelona which more important than Madrid for many Spanish players).
I wonder how many grand slams he will end up with.
All subjective. There would be a lot who disagree with you. To suggest that it's a stretch that Nadal at 20 was better is a little weird. You talk about competition but conveniently left out that Nadal beat Federer in his prime.
It's because of his idiotic opinions.Novak is just the most gracious and classy loser there is. His unpopularity never makes sense.
He's been disliked since before his idiotic opinions.It's because of his idiotic opinions.
Being elite on all surfaces in 2023 is a totally different prospect to being elite on all surfaces in the 1980s. I don't think such a player even existed back then, such was the disparity.
People love Federer and Nadal more and he was always looked as the 3rd guy but then he crashed their party and overtook them. I feel there is more respect for him now than say 10 years back.Novak is just the most gracious and classy loser there is. His unpopularity never makes sense.
Difficult to predict but I'd be surprised if he doesn't win more than 10.
If he can continue his potential without hard injuries or something else like an early retire, I think he will definitely have over 10+ grand slams. 20+, I don't know, it's a really difficult task to achieve but the situation happened to Djokovic before people don't think that he would get 20+ slams. At the moment, we know what Djoko has achieved in recent years.
As of right now we can say that he can win 20+. One of the biggest drivers of big trophies in Tennis is the quality of competition. Novak is 36 and will be gone soon and none of the next gen are remotely close. The only competition as it stands after Novak is his body.
Novak is just the most gracious and classy loser there is. His unpopularity never makes sense.
It's the Eastern European, mainly Balkan stereotype projected onto him. "He's a machine, a ruthless winner." Tribalism. He's so much more than that.
Phenomenal final.
That game 5 in the third set will live long in my memory.
Alcaraz has come at a time Tennis on the men’s side so desperately needed him
With Fed gone, Nadal iffy as too wether he’ll come back, we needed a challenger for the last great in Djokovic, arise Alacaraz
I hope we get to be graced with atleast 2-3 years of godly tennis between these 2
and in doing so, Alcaraz can hopefully pull a rival out of the otherwise disappointing next gen pack to challenge him after Djokovic hangs his racket up
Todays final was an utter joy and of the highest quality, not “the greatest” but without question “one of the great” finals
Alcaraz at 20 years and 72 days old is already multiple GS Winner!
If he ends up on 8-10, it would have been a very disappointing career given he already has 2 Slams and will have a lot of years without any of the GOATs around.Alcaraz already on 2 Majors, can definitely get to 8-10
Almost did his knee on two occasions today though. Needs to be careful
If he ends up on 8-10, it would have been a very disappointing career given he already has 2 Slams and will have a lot of years without any of the GOATs around.
There has to be a couple of 16-17 year olds who will break through big time in a couple years though. 10 Majors would be a mighty achievement.
Don't forget the Sampras mark was widely viewed as impossible to overtake before the big 3 did it
His unpopularity never makes sense.
It makes complete sense. There’s a reason why crowds constantly turn against him. If things aren’t going his way he acts like a complete prick. Look at him today, roaring at the crowd, blowing them kisses, cupping his ears, sarcastically clapping. Incredible player but just unbelievably unlikeable. His political views probably don’t help either.
If he ends up on 8-10, it would have been a very disappointing career given he already has 2 Slams and will have a lot of years without any of the GOATs around.
I think it would only be disappointing because of the talent he possesses and looking at the lack of generational talents that have come through since Novak and Rafa. I did have some doubts before today that he's being overhyped but if he can do this vs Novak at the biggest stage, I think he should easily be able to get to 15 Slams assuming he has no major career injury.Only 8 men in history have 10 or more.
You simply don't know who else could come along or step up. He ticks all the boxes for generational talent and at the moment looks like he could have a very dominant run post Novak but absolutely no one on earth should be disappointed with 10 slams in a career!
It makes complete sense. There’s a reason why crowds constantly turn against him. If things aren’t going his way he acts like a complete prick. Look at him today, roaring at the crowd, blowing them kisses, cupping his ears, sarcastically clapping. Incredible player but just unbelievably unlikeable. His political views probably don’t help either.
Yes, well saidYep clay and grass court tennis were basically like different sports like then. Borg played as a defensive grinder when he won his titles at Roland Garros, and then serve-volleyed behind 100% of 1st serves when he won his titles at Wimbledon. I believe that in the mid to late 80s, Lendl also won Roland Garros titles playing as a grinder, and then reached Wimbledon finals serve-volleying behind 100% of 1st and 2nd serves.
Also players had to adapt to facing opponents with a far more diverser range of playing styles back then. For example when Sampras won his 1990 US Open title as a teenager, in the last 3 rounds, he faced Lendl who played a pretty agressive baseline style and come to the net a moderate amount of times (more times than players would come to the net big matches nowadays), then McEnroe who serve-volleyed behind almost every 1st and 2nd serve, and then Agassi who almost exclusively played from the baseline.
I think it would only be disappointing because of the talent he possesses and looking at the lack of generational talents that have come through since Novak and Rafa. I did have some doubts before today that he's being overhyped but if he can do this vs Novak at the biggest stage, I think he should easily be able to get to 15 Slams assuming he has no major career injury.
He's already picked up a fair amount of injuries so I agree! However, someone like Rafa who faced fairly serious injuries and setbacks through his career, still managed to end up with 22 Slams despite facing Roger, Novak and Murray throughout this period so I think Carlos should be fine! Unless ofcourse he's as unlucky as Del Po or Thiem to pick up career ruining wrist injuries.The last part of your post is the most important. He could have torn his ACL twice today.
Then again I am happy to revise my estimates and bring them up to 15. See you on RedCafe in 2033 to see how he measured up