BeforeKeanetherewasRobson
Full Member
Against first serves not much over 100mph(less earlier), should be smacking them back. Very safeThis has been piss poor from Fritz
Against first serves not much over 100mph(less earlier), should be smacking them back. Very safeThis has been piss poor from Fritz
Sorry, misread. Thought you meant better than Dutch players who'd won.Ofcourse he's better. Van Rijthoven could become a good player if he stays fit, but so far he has played only a handful of ATP games and was ranked outside of the top 200. I dont really rate Botic. He's boringly decent and whike his serve is big, it's not big enough to trouble the big guns as was demonstrated by Nadal needing only half a set to neutralize his serve entirely.
Nadal's been brilliant on return but it's his own serve where he's struggled a lot so, no yet.
Standard Rafa this. He's shockingly poor at closing out matches so never expected him to serve it out. Absolutely shocking drop shot though.You were right. Not over yet
Ah you mean like Krajicek? Nah he was much better than Fritz.Sorry, misread. Thought you meant better than Dutch players who'd won.
As you were.
Called it. It's unreal how nervy Rafa gets.5-0 is where Rafa's nerves will start to show and first serves disappear.
A not very high quality tiebreak is apt for how this match has been.Shame Fritz can't play a decent tie break. A more excititing end would've been cool.
More than Rafa being a warrior, which he is and has proven enough, this shows the still existing gulf in quality between the old guard and the young ones. Even at 40% he still beats them in a 5 setter.
Given that Novak Has already once "faked" injury to "confuse" Fritz once before, you'd think he'd have figured it out by now.That was blatant display of acting and dramatizing non existent injury in order to confuse the opponent. There is nothing warrior like in that.
Given that Novak Has already once "faked" injury to "confuse" Fritz once before, you'd think he'd have figured it out by now.
Ofcourse the movement and grounstrokes were fine and that's why he did so well at returning Ftitz's serve all match long. It was the serve that was comprised with the abdominal injury and that was evident in the fact that he has been broken more than he ever has on grass.Either these painkillers are amazing or the injury isn't as bad as people think. His movement and groundstrokes were totally fine.
How was Nadal in sets 4 and 5? Even when he was struggling in set 2 and 3 his ground strokes were fine but the serve was weak, as expected with an abdominal issue.
I'm surprised he won but given it wasn't a movement issue and not impossible to serve he was always in it, even if he wasn't favorite.
Ofcourse the movement and grounstrokes were fine and that's why he did so well at returning Ftitz's serve all match long. It was the serve that was comprised with the abdominal injury and that was evident in the fact that he has been broken more than he ever has on grass.
Kept getting broken, his serve was weak throughout, but yeah his Forehand actually looked better than the rest of the tournament even.How was Nadal in sets 4 and 5? Even when he was struggling in set 2 and 3 his ground strokes were fine but the serve was weak, as expected with an abdominal issue.
I'm surprised he won but given it wasn't a movement issue and not impossible to serve he was always in it, even if he wasn't favorite.
Have to disagree about the first hour. His serve speed was way down but his movement and general play from the baseline looked fine, if not erratic to me.He was fresh as a daisy. Looked dead after first hour but at the very end played like the match just started. Nothing unusual.
He could get away with it. Kyrgios has a much better serve but he's not a good returner. Throwing in his first serves at second serve speed vs Djokovic and it will be a pasting.Kept getting broken, his serve was weak throughout, but yeah his Forehand actually looked better than the rest of the tournament even.
0 chance to beat Kyrigos if you can't hold serve.