I thought it was both. Roman IMO seemed to me to be pressing himself into his shoulder as much as Ken was pulling him.You think? Roman is a masochist, I suppose. Although Ken is nasty enough to do it. Plus Roman is tiny and couldn't exactly pull away if he wanted to.
Yeah but not even a scene of Frank turning him down or Ken being told he’s not playing ball? It was a dramatic scene that ended an episode and it’s almost as if it didn’t happen. Just out of the blue, Frank is a lock for them
They are not free though, at least Kendall isn't. The seat is poison but the way they ended it is not definitive because what's stopping Kendall or Roman or Shiv from trying to buyout Waystar from Lukas in the future?The whole point is that they don't change, it's a destructive cycle. At least now Kendal and Roman are free of it. It's not game of thrones, who wins the throne then is going to usher in a grand better future. That seat is poison. How does it render the 3.5 seasons pointless?? because Kendal isn't ceo?? or one of the other ones? The point isn't about who sits on the "throne" in the end, it's about the journey there which has been fecking phenomenal.
I just felt like it was far too obvious of an ending.
As soon as I saw Tom meeting with Matsson I knew it was him.
Series finales are always tricky and you can't satisfy everyone but I think I hated it.
I agree actually. It would have been a pretty cool (Godfather esque) ending if it ended with S3 and Shiv realising that Tom betrayed her to Logan. Her seeing into the door of them shaking hands and then the door shuts etc.I hated it aswell. What's annoying is I kind of saw the Tom thing after Karl tore him a new one in Episode 4, ( I actually expected the document Frank found to say Tom), I just thought they surely wouldn't be this lazy and do a GoT S8 ending.
As tricky as endings are, Season 4 was just unnecessary if the ending was to be Tom. I mean nothing new was added character wise to the Logan kids.
The whole season ended up being a poor setup of a silly unnecessary plot twist of CEO Tom.
Waystar Royco was already Sold in Season 3, the kids lost and were still pieces of sh#te, Tom the successor made sense then especially aftet the betreyal, so what was the point of Season 4?
They didn't need the cheap plot twist deviating from their brilliant writting.
They were informed during the read through of the last episode. It was never going to be conclusive and they were never going to answer everything. That's the kind of storytelling Succession has always done. I'm surprised we even learned about Rose there at the end.They are not free though, at least Kendall isn't. The seat is poison but the way they ended it is not definitive because what's stopping Kendall or Roman or Shiv from trying to buyout Waystar from Lukas in the future?
Their stories did not end conclusively. If Kendall jumps off that bridge at least it's closure because it concludes the tragic tale of the unworthy successor.
The cast of the show had said they were informed after the shooting that there will be no further seasons and I think it shows because a lot of plots were left unaddressed.
The point was never about who would be CEO but completing the journeys of all these characters and I don't know, it doesn't seem a satisfying end to the journey for me. But yes I do appreciate there will always be someone not happy with an ending, so fair play to the writers and Jesse if that's how they wanted to end.
One of the best shows I've seen in recent times but just short of being one of the all time greats in my book.
At least now Kendal and Roman are free of it. It's not game of thrones, who wins the throne then is going to usher in a grand better future.
Season 2 was just brilliant, especially since the whole show was all about Logan's expediency and his succession, so you are very right, that would have made for a good ending.I agree actually. It would have been a pretty cool (Godfather esque) ending if it ended with S3 and Shiv realising that Tom betrayed her to Logan. Her seeing into the door of them shaking hands and then the door shuts etc.
I’d have liked it a lot more ambiguous.
I think the best possible ending would have been the ending of S2 personally. That Logan smirk sort of implying that he thinks Ken is ready by becoming the “killer” that he wanted to succeed him.
Tom only gained from the perspective of Tom, and likely only in the short term. So I'm not specifically sure he won, other than he ended the show reasonably happy, but he's not in a position Ken/Roman at least, particularly wanted, and Shiv only wanted out of desperation.
Good point. Tom will presumably get tossed aside as and when it suits Matsson.Tom only gained from the perspective of Tom, and likely only in the short term. So I'm not specifically sure he won, other than he ended the show reasonably happy, but he's not in a position Ken/Roman at least, particularly wanted, and Shiv only wanted out of desperation.
And isn't he only in that position due to the President elect asking for specifics, who's not actually President elect... so it's gonna be even shorter term that expected anyway. I mean I'd love to fail upwards like Tom, not gonna lie... but I wouldn't want to be where he is if I was one of the siblings, even Shiv, but she's shameless.
Matsson "won".
Good point. Tom will presumably get tossed aside as and when it suits Matsson.
Shiv would have been more secure with her brothers in terms of being ‘involved’
Tom won because he's just upper-middle class guy who went to college. For him to end up as the CEO of a major corporation is a big deal and opens many doors, plus the fact that the company is no longer owned by Logan Roy means he can shake off the perception that he's just some nepotism hire.
I would say Tom won because he was never going higher than this. IIRC being CEO (as a proxy of Shiv) was his big objective in the first season.Yeah I get all that, but he's essentially competing in a different ballgame to the others, so it's hard to claim he won...
I think what Shiv did was rational in that it was the best option for her. She realised it and it made her emotional.Shiv didn't act out of rational deliberations, she burned her family, so going back to Tom and Mattson is the only thing she has left. And Tom started the show has someone's husband and now he himself is a someone. He has won either way. Matsson didn't pick him, because he needed something specific from him either, he picked him, because he's a loyal and effective servant, who knows his place. So it's not like he will necessarily get tossed aside the next minute.
I think what Shiv did was rational in that it was the best option for her. She realised it and it made her emotional.
Matsson has no loyalty to Tom. He is just being used in the same way he used Shiv, for his own self interest. Once that’s over he’ll probably bin him too.
It was the best of the shit options for her.In what way was it a good option? Tom and Mattson both backstabbed her in this very episode. She has no job at the company and can go back to political consulting now. Meanwhile Ken offered her ATN.
And in what way is Tom being used? Shiv was used to get the deal over the line, Tom was hired after it got over the line.
It was the best of the shit options for her.
Who knows if that would have even happened. She probably feared being marginalised by her brothers.I'd say being CEO of a leading news network is better than having nothing.
It was also a very logical decision by her though, going by her motivations.Conceptually, the ending is fine: the siblings can keep the company but won't, because their father's habit of pitting them against each other is something they can never shake off. That's fine and well and good.
The problem is in the execution, in wanting to make it a twist. We get scenes like Shiv being betrayed by Mattson and then being angry when finding out about Tom being the CEO, we get scenes like the siblings having a nice time with each other, holding their hands over their father's video, etc. so that Shiv's betrayal can play as a twist. But it comes at the expense of undermining her motivations; it is less believable that she would rationally make this decision. It's still believable that she might make it emotionally, but then we are left with the climax of the series being a spontanous emotional reaction by someone, which is not super satisfying.
I think it was more how he acted upon sitting in Logan's chair and acting all arrogant even though the job wasn't done yet, they still hadn't stopped the sale. They cut to Shiv's face the moment he put his feet on the table and you knew then she was gonna stab him.pretty sure that “cnut is as cnut does” line is what fecked it for him
In what way was it a good option? Tom and Mattson both backstabbed her in this very episode. She has no job at the company and can go back to political consulting now. Meanwhile Ken offered her ATN.
And in what way is Tom being used? Shiv was used to get the deal over the line, Tom was hired after it got over the line.
Well put. If they wanted to show the sibs as unworthy successors who would betray each other, fair enough, but the way it was done did not seem fitting to me.Conceptually, the ending is fine: the siblings can keep the company but won't, because their father's habit of pitting them against each other is something they can never shake off. That's fine and well and good.
The problem is in the execution, in wanting to make it a twist. We get scenes like Shiv being betrayed by Mattson and then being angry when finding out about Tom being the CEO, we get scenes like the siblings having a nice time with each other, holding their hands over their father's video, etc. so that Shiv's betrayal can play as a twist. But it comes at the expense of undermining her motivations; it is less believable that she would rationally make this decision. It's still believable that she might make it emotionally, but then we are left with the climax of the series being a spontanous emotional reaction by someone, which is not super satisfying.
Well put. If they wanted to show the sibs as unworthy successors who would betray each other, fair enough, but the way it was done did not seem fitting to me.
I mean, that's on him. Anyway, he'll be having brunch with Shiv and Roman in a week and he'll still have Stewy to have sex with when they're on molly.Kendall is free of his ex-wife and children, his siblings, his loyal assistant, his reputation, his power, and his only reason to live.
Nah CEO of ATN was far better than being a professional wife. However true to form she probably believes she can scheme her way from the sidelines to success rather than simply putting the work in.It was the best of the shit options for her.
I dont think they want you to think it's finally blown up for good. Yea they no longer have control of the company blabla, there's a reason some of the actors thought it wasn't ending at the final read through cause there's always stuff that can still happen, and for it to continue. And that's how this family is, they hurt each other and next week they're having brunch and pretend nothing happened.To me, here is where the show finally suffers from its habit of always returning to the status quo. No matter what these people did to each other, it never truly held. They always ended up back in each other's orbit and somehow willing to let it go. So that's how we understand their dynamic.
If you want to finally blow it all up for good, it feels like you need something stronger than what we got: a split-second, visceral decision.