He's a guy seemingly with some sort of mental issue, surrounded by enablers.
Spot on
I studied behavioural Science and this is a classic case.
A = Antecedent - Something that happens before behaviour. It can set the stage for, and influence whether that behaviour occurs.
B = Behaviour - Is what a person then does or says. To be an actual behaviour it must be measurable and observable.
C = Consequence - Something that occurs during or after a person engages in behaviour.
I'll not give a chapter on the ABCs but you get the point.
Behaviours come after Antecedents but future Behaviours depend on Consequence which in turn are governed by:
Reinforcers
+ Reinforcement = Adding something to the environment which causes behaviour to increase (behaviour continues because they get what they want)
- Reinforcement = removing something from the environment which causes behaviour to increase (we take away the problem for them so they avoid what they don't want to happen)
Both + & - reinforcers increase the behaviour.
Punishers
If behaviour stops it's been subjected to punishment and is now less likely to occur. It's not punishing the individual but but if behaviour stops then a punisher has been recieved.
+ Punisher = Adding something to the environment which causes the behaviour to stop (because they get something they don't want)
- Punisher = Removing something from the environment which causes the behaviour to stop (because they loose something they like)
Both + & - Punishers decrease the behaviour.
Enablers (as I quoted above poster) are a failing mix of the above.
Suarez would be a fantastic case if we were party to what has gone on behind the scenes.