We'll just have to agree to disagree, then, since I've made my case already and you've dismissed it. No hard feelings or anything, since this is all a matter of opinion, but I think it's a pretty valid statement that an off the ball incident of deliberate violent conduct requires as lengthy a ban as a swinging elbow to the face. To summarize, my point is this: it's not the actual damage done to the opposition player, nor even the potential damage that could be done to the opposition player (i.e. elbow vs. bite), but rather the intent here that really matters, and that probably deserves a hefty ban from FIFA. If it were a punch or a kick off the ball, I'd be saying the same thing, even though those acts would likely cause more harm to the opposition player. It's the deliberate violent conduct toward another player with (what we assume is) no provocation that really justifies a deserved ban. Fighting for the ball, in the midst of a scrap, many players throw elbows and many get sent off. But when uninvolved in the play, if you throw an elbow, that surely must result in a longer ban, since it's purely violent with no relation to the play. Anyhow, we'll agree to disagree, and I'd like to say it was nice having a thoughtful interaction about this rather than some of the hysterical fanaticism I've seen around the internet today regarding the incident.