Sofyan Amrabat | signs for United on loan

Status
Not open for further replies.
Your kidding right!? Posts like this do my head in.

Our net spend is relatively high because we refuse the offload players. The don't want to actualise losses on players like Maguire by paying them off to go.

I say again, our main rivals matched our treble. There should have been some real intent from the club to overhaul the squad, remove the deadwood and reinvest in players who may actually make it here. Instead we are meandering on through yet another season with players at the club who should have been moved on long ago, blocking us moving forward.

You look at home many players Arteta was able to get out of Arsenal over the past 18 months, either through sales or cancelling contracts. That's what a club with a level of ambition is willing to do. With the Glazer's sporting comes second to profits.

You say we have signed expensive players... We aren't dining at the top table, not even in the conversation for players like Rice who we actually need.

The board is totally corrupt and exists only to facilitate the business goals of the Glazers. And let me tell you, those goals don't include winning trophies.

You say that but they've spent near the exact same amount of us since Artera came. They've only exited a handful more as well and like us mostly fringe players. Like us they also have players they're struggling to offload. The difference is they've done good business on who they bring in.

Our fans have a habit of looking at everything as if we're in a unique position and playing the victim. We spend enough to be competitive but when you're throwing around huge figures for players you can't afford many to go wrong and that's the phase we're in, fixing mistakes just like Arsenal were.
 
Wow, things have escalated in here today :lol:
 
You say that but they've spent near the exact same amount of us since Artera came. They've only exited a handful more as well and like us mostly fringe players. Like us they also have players they're struggling to offload. The difference is they've done good business on who they bring in.

Our fans have a habit of looking at everything as if we're in a unique position and playing the victim. We spend enough to be competitive but when you're throwing around huge figures for players you can't afford many to go wrong and that's the phase we're in, fixing mistakes just like Arsenal were.
The difference is Arteta has had 4 years of fixing the squad and Ten hag has had one season.

The difference is up until last season the Glazers hired Woodward to dictate transfer policy which involved bloating current contracts to inflate player asset worth and outright wasting money.

Our wage bill was bloated far more than Arsenal's which left Murtough severely handicapped in selling deadwood.
 
I'd much rather just keep Casemiro, with Mainoo as his deputy. If that doesn't work, then sign a long term Casemiro replacement.
Amrabat is not a Casemiro replacement, he adds something Casemiro doesn’t. He is a first phase midfielder and will be important for our buildup.
 
Sounds reasonable. But then, why was Mount and Onana the prioritised targets?

Mount because other clubs were interested and Chelsea needed to sell early in the window.
Onana because of how poor De Gea finished the season and once it was decided that we weren't renewing him we needed a new first choice GK.
 
Never a truer word spoken. And it’s mad - it’s not that we didn’t have the money to spend - it’s that we spent it on the wrong players - Sancho, Antony, Casemiro, Mount cumulatively cost €250million - regardless of opinions or views, none represent good value or clear planning. It’s really irritating.

I would say all of these represent a very clear and coherent strategy, putting pieces in place to allow Ten Hag to work towards the sort of football he has produced elsewhere in his career and talked about wanting to produce here.

-He wanted FDJ for a physical, defensively-solid but also creative deep midfielder with Champions League pedigree. He couldn't get him - never really on the cards - so we got Casemiro instead, who surprised many fans with his all-round and creative performances on top of the expected defensive contribution.
-He wants hard-working, line-hugging wingers who don't lose the ball too much, who press intelligently and understand how to position themselves to transition well, who can commit defenders. Particularly, the club hasn't really had a proper right winger since Valencia (!). He got Antony, and clearly likes what he sees because he always plays when fit despite options like Amad and Pellistri who fans clamour to see more of.
-He needed an intelligent #8 who understands transitional football, who can press effectively (not just energetically) and has an engine. Didn't need to be wildly creative because Bruno already brings that. He couldn't get one, first summer, but Eriksen ticked several of those boxes. Mount is more in line with what he probably wanted, particularly his pressing and workmate.

Sancho I'll give you. It seemed he was being signed as that right winger, and quickly became clear he's not good from the right. But then that wasn't an ETH-era signing, was it.

We've regularly overpaid, for sure. But there's a very clear plan behind the majority of our signings, including others you haven't mentioned, like Varane, Martinez, Onana. I'd just argue you want the plan to be something different to what it is. Which is your prerogative, but ETH is the manager and it's his plan.
 
I think this may have been done before, but can one of the FFP nerds tell us what percentage of our summer budget (on an amortized basis) is made up of Mount's amortized transfer fee plus wages?
 
Amrabat is not a Casemiro replacement, he adds something Casemiro doesn’t. He is a first phase midfielder and will be important for our buildup.
That's all well and good if he's happy to come here as a rotational option. Bruno and Mount will be starting nearly every game you would assume.
 
Correct, amortisation and debt have no relation at all. The poster you’re responding to doesn’t seem to have any financial reporting understanding and is just spouting gibberish with made up terms. Amortised transfer debts is not a thing.

Paying off supplier debts to clubs for transfers won’t help anything, no. They are agreed payment structures and essentially free loans. Paying them early would be the height of stupidity.

We were definitely not fined because the Glazers didn’t inject directors capital. Yes, UEFA changed the way Covid losses were allowed which made us show a loss.
I’m very easily confused but, in this case, I thought I had gone quite mad.
 
Amrabat is not a Casemiro replacement, he adds something Casemiro doesn’t. He is a first phase midfielder and will be important for our buildup.
Amrabat should offer balance to the team. Cas, Mount, Bruno along with our 3 up front is just too powder puff and easy to over run. Cas can’t do it all. Why the Glazers won’t offer up the money for him is a farce. This signing is a must.
 
Very nice of him to leave it till 31st of August.
I said this and someone told me to stop finding things to be negative about. Nothing screams 'priority target' like telling a bloke you're going to bid for him in June, forcing him to train on his own and miss the opening of the season, then coming in for him on deadline day with a £2m loan deal...
 
That's all well and good if he's happy to come here as a rotational option. Bruno and Mount will be starting nearly every game you would assume.
I would highly doubt he is happy to be designated a rotation option. He’s coming to compete for a place in the team. Sometimes he’ll be selected sometimes not. The better he plays the more he’ll be selected. He knows that, we know that; what’s the problem?
 
I would highly doubt he is happy to be designated a rotation option. He’s coming to compete for a place in the team. Sometimes he’ll be selected sometimes not. The better he plays the more he’ll be selected. He knows that, we know that; what’s the problem?
The problem is that we plan to play with one 6 and two 8's for the majority of our games. Amrabat doesn't really fit into that system if he isn't the starting 6.
 
The problem is that we plan to play with one 6 and two 8's for the majority of our games. Amrabat doesn't really fit into that system.
He can play as the no6 no problem. He might even be able to fill in at no8. Within games or as a tactical variation we might switch to a double pivot. He’s being bought to be used imo.

Possibly he will struggle to get a lot of starts but it’s down to him to prove himself. He wouldn’t be happy if you told him he’s not going to start games, of course not. But who would pre-determine that and tell him so? Nobody with any sense. Going on what EtH has been saying in interviews, I surmise he would be competition for no6. He will get games there imo.
 
I said this and someone told me to stop finding things to be negative about. Nothing screams 'priority target' like telling a bloke you're going to bid for him in June, forcing him to train on his own and miss the opening of the season, then coming in for him on deadline day with a £2m loan deal...
We've seen the same thing happening for 10 years now. Some United fans will never call out bullshit when it's in their face, will actually wait for the whole thing to blow out and then act surprised. The whole summer has been an absolute farce and it's not "being negative" if you say what it is.
 
He can play as the no6 no problem. He might even be able to fill in at no8. Within games or as a tactical variation we might switch to a double pivot. He’s being bought to be used imo.

Possibly he will struggle to get a lot of starts but it’s down to him to prove himself. He wouldn’t be happy if you told him he’s not going to start games, of course not. But who would pre-determine that and tell him so? Nobody with any sense. Going on what EtH has been saying in interviews, I surmise he would be competition for no6. He will get games there imo.
He can play as the 6, but we won't be dropping Casemiro. I agree that he is being signed as a tactical variation, but that sounds like a squad role to me. We already have competition for the 6 in Mainoo. McTominay is still hanging around too.
 
Just like our transfer window. Par for the course I say.
All well and good but when I come here for some info on the player all I see is bickering and moaning. More than enough threads for that elsewhere.
 
Your kidding right!? Posts like this do my head in.

Our net spend is relatively high because we refuse the offload players. The don't want to actualise losses on players like Maguire by paying them off to go.

I say again, our main rivals matched our treble. There should have been some real intent from the club to overhaul the squad, remove the deadwood and reinvest in players who may actually make it here. Instead we are meandering on through yet another season with players at the club who should have been moved on long ago, blocking us moving forward.

You look at home many players Arteta was able to get out of Arsenal over the past 18 months, either through sales or cancelling contracts. That's what a club with a level of ambition is willing to do. With the Glazer's sporting comes second to profits.

You say we have signed expensive players... We aren't dining at the top table, not even in the conversation for players like Rice who we actually need.

The board is totally corrupt and exists only to facilitate the business goals of the Glazers. And let me tell you, those goals don't include winning trophies.
Who are we refusing to offload? There are no takers for our players because of the insane wages we give them. No other clubs can match that. So we end up getting quoted peanuts as transfer fee and also players refuse to leave as no one will match their current wages.

We have stop giving silly wages to players. The problem is two fold - managers not identifying correct players and us giving silly wages and wage extensions all the time. Investment has never been a problem for us. Let's say for example we sign an amazing LB or an academy prospect becomes a world beater LB, there is no way we can sell Shaw for any money even though he is a very good player and English national. He will be happy to sit in our bench because there is no way any other club in the world is paying as much for a LB.
 
I'd add Højlund to that list. If we were aware he had an injury that would keep him out for a few weeks, what was the rush to get it done knowing he wasn't going to be available anyway?

My understanding was the back injury was discovered in the medical…so it would be strange for the club to then put the brakes at the medical stage to look for a no.6?

Not sure I see the connection you are making?
 
That's all well and good if he's happy to come here as a rotational option. Bruno and Mount will be starting nearly every game you would assume.
You assume wrong. Amrabat will start most games. Don’t be surprised to see Bruno out on the RW
 
Who are we refusing to offload? There are no takers for our players because of the insane wages we give them. No other clubs can match that. So we end up getting quoted peanuts as transfer fee and also players refuse to leave as no one will match their current wages.

We have stop giving silly wages to players. The problem is two fold - managers not identifying correct players and us giving silly wages and wage extensions all the time. Investment has never been a problem for us. Let's say for example we sign an amazing LB or an academy prospect becomes a world beater LB, there is no way we can sell Shaw for any money even though he is a very good player and English national. He will be happy to sit in our bench because there is no way any other club in the world is paying as much for a LB.

Maguire we refused to payoff despite him having no business at the club.

Mctominay we refused £30m for despite that being probably his price.

There are two.
 
You assume wrong. Amrabat will start most games. Don’t be surprised to see Bruno out on the RW

If Amrabat joins one of Bruno or Mount will end up on the wing most games unless Case or Amrabat are injured.
 
Very nice of him to leave it till 31st of August.
We agreed personal terms with Amrabat in June. The manager isn’t responsible for leaving it till now to put the bid in, we all know who is responsible
 
Status
Not open for further replies.