So the 3-5-2

I watch 20 United games a season so I don't see things as good as you people. Why do you think this is not a good idea?
getting rid of mata for a start is a terrible notion, why do i think 'this is not a good idea' we dont have two of those players you mentioned, we've looked good playing the 3-5-1-2/5-3-2 in pre season.

No one's trying to play all the number 10's, Mata is playing in the hole, Rooney is playing up top, Adan is still young and will be playing in the rotation it seems (and he done a good job today)

Kagawa is wasted, its a shame but sometimes thing don't work out, also last season isn't anything to judge this on
 
I think when RVP comes back I want to see a proper 4-2-3-1. And with our wingers being shit, playing Mata out wide for a game under LVG will be interesting.

RVP

Januzaj-----Rooney-----Mata

Herrera-----Carrick​
 
I don't believe we have enough players in the squad that suit this 3-5-2 formation. That's not to say that some of them won't adapt to it in time, nor to say that we should bin the system and not just bin the players once new ones are bought in.
It's fair to say we had a fair few out today which clearly made a difference. Having Rafael Valencia Shaw Evans Carrick and RVP back would allow a better view of the system.

To me that's common sense, you play a system that suits the players you have in the squad, you don't shoehorn the players into a system they aren't suited to.
 
Di Maria just had the best season of his career so far playing as the left CM in a 4-3-3 and you want to move him out wide again?

Well yes, in a let's call it default formation, but he would also get plenty of minutes in place of Khedira. Probably a key tactical decision in that team..
 
The goal was seemingly conceded due to the central midfield failing to track Ki, so it's hard to blame that on the system.
It’s weird Ki had so much space in the middle, both goals are more a mistake from the midfielders (who left them too much space) than defenders IMO.

Doesn't work in the Premier League
Early days I think, hard to say if your fullbacks are Young and Lingard/Januzaj, and you have to play Fletcher for 90 minutes.

I really don't like it. I'd much prefer us to get the chequebook out and get the players in to play 4-3-3. We're more suited to it.
4 strikers, 3 number 10s and all that. Not going to happen for a while I’d say. Who would you play in the middle 3 by the way?

That too, and it didnt help that our fastest player, Januzaj, was on the bench. We should always have at least one of him and Welbeck on the pitch imo, otherwise we have no pace or directness and we're too easy to defend against.
I've been saying this from the very beginning. Welbeck movement will be crucial in this system. Hernandez and Rooney can't play together in this system for a number of reasons.

Jones/Smalling don't pass the ball aprticularly well for defenders nor do they look to push up with the ball enough (Jones did this better tbf 2nd half).
We've got no wingbacks just players filling it who are clearly inexperienced defensively. Currently it's really only their pace which gets them out of trouble.

And this creates a issue whereby the midfielders keep having to come deeper or are much more easily marked as the oppositions forwards don't need to be worried about our defenders on the ball. They can stand off them and help close space for the midfielders, slowing us down or forcing us long. And with the wingbacks pre januzaj coming on not being players who run at others primarily we're stuck with them passing the ball back infield to an already crowded area.
It's fair enough that injuries would hinder you but there's no denying at the least that we lack backup to come in for these injured players and play this system naturally.
Agreed. In this system 3CBs see too much of the ball, because midfielders are not making themselves available for a pass, but also because we played 2nd string wingbacks.

Biggest problem was tracking runners through midfield. We need our 2 midfielders and the number 10 to be defensively alert. If LvG is thinking the same thing, it could explain out pursuit of Di Maria.
This will be the biggest issue with our current squad, central midfielder role in this system is very energy consuming, Fletcher can’t handle this IMO, while I’m still not sure how good Herrera is defensive-wise. Who else is there to cover?

Let's not go into panic mode yet. It's going to take time to get used to the system. With shaw at left wing back and Rafael or Valencia at right wing back I'm sure we will look a lot stronger in this system. And if we can add a centre midfielder and a centre back to the squad I would be fairly confident that this system will work.
I agree completely.

I think we can play it, but I really think we need the directness of Luke Shaw and Valencia/Rafael on the wings. It's our only chance of getting behind the defence unless Welbeck is one of the strikers.

We missed a trick today as when van Persie and Welbeck are not fit, what is the reason to still play 3412? The point of the system is to get our best three players on the pitch (or Welbeck for more pace and defence stretching if one of them is out). Easy to say in hindsight, but we could have played with:

de Gea

Jones Smalling Blackett James

Fletcher Herrera

Lingard Mata Young

Rooney

That was only dropping Hernandez from today's line-up, which a lot of people were indeed calling for in this system. It's also not starting any of the supposedly unfit players (Januzaj, Fellaini, Nani) even though I do think the two wider players could have started in this system and been subbed off instead if they tired.

I do think we should persevere with 3412, but the reason LvG is playing it is to get our best players on the pitch.. Today, to do that he didn't need to play 3412. I can understand why he did (continuity, everyone getting used to the system in the Premier League etc) but he changed it at half time anyway, so maybe he should have thought about that before the game - especially with the pace Swansea had on the flanks.
Excellent post. We will be using 3-5-2 to play all of our best players at the same time, but in my opinion it was a mistake to go with 3-5-2 with Hernandez&Rooney in attack and Young&Lingard as wingbacks. Bizarre choice.

Not a fan of this system, but it can work if the defenders decide to use the midfield as well. They stroked the ball very well at the back, but then instead of looking for someone in midfield, they decide to continuously hit the long ball trying to get a striker to run behind the defense. It didn't help that Mata barely had a pulse out there today apart from the dead ball situations.
It’s like they have a default option to go wide, ignoring the midfielders. Herrera and Fletch were not great at all, but it was pretty easy to defend against us. As a result, Mata wasn’t seeing enough of the ball.

Right, now all of my thoughts put together.

Van Gaal made a mistake going with that formation today. It was stated many times that for 3-5-2 to work needs specialized wingbacks. It won’t work with those we used today (well, I’m fine with Young on the right, but our game is not fluid when he has to cut to the right foot everytime while playing on the left).

In my opinion it was a mistake to go with 3-5-2 with Young&Lingard and Rooney&Hernandez up top. I understand we are trying to accommodate all of our best players but when RVP, Welbeck and first choice wingbacks are injured then I would suggest something like Havak.

Also, for this system to work we need to play much faster football.
 
3 centre backs against teams who are going to defend for the whole game. Yeah, good one. It's a fecking awful formation and van gaals needs to get his fecking act together and sign some top players so we can play a decent formation.
 
The general book on 3-5-2 is:

1. Works great against teams that with 2 proper strikers up front (Citeh at times, Burnley did last year in the Champo and QPR too I think, although neither will do it against us. They might at home, along with Hull who match us with a 3-5-2)
2. Should work decently against teams seeking to dominate possession in our half, (Arsenal) unless they have really dangerous fullbacks (Everton)
3. Struggles against teams that play 1 up front and 2 wide forwards, since it's either 3 vs 3 or 5 vs at the back, which are both unfavorable for opposite reasons. (Chelsea, Stoke, Villa, Liverpool, Newcastle, Swansea, West Ham, literally everybody these days?)
4. Can struggle against teams that press really high if you can't pass your way out of it short or hit long balls over the top/for hold up play (As Bayern showed mid-week. Probably Pochettino's Spurs, some managers at home, who don't rate our ability to play out against a press).

It just doesn't seem like it will be better than a 4-3-3, even with one of Rooney or Mata reduced in effectiveness by playing as an inverted winger, against most teams. I think we'll end up using it often against the other teams from the top 7 at home and pretty much all the time away, sometimes away against bottom 13 sides and only 2-3 more times all season at home to start, but maybe to shut down games when we're ahead and play on the counter we'll see the reverse of the Winger for CB sub that turns the 3-5-2 into a 4-3-3.

I do think it will be useful when we get back to the CL, though there's a fair chance that won't be this coming season.

A good bet would be how many halves - out of the 76 Prem ones we play - with 3 at the back this year. We're at 1/2 right now. Since LVG might chance mid-half with a sub, I'd guess about 28 full halves of 3, 8 where he switches mid-way through and 40 with 4 at the back, though I'd say those are pretty anti 3 at the back guesses, and a fair betting line would be more like 40-8-28.
 
I don't see how we can play 4-3-3 with this squad. If we play rooney and MAta out wide then not only are they poor at it relatively but they also do it in away that reduces its effectiveness.

They do not stretch the defence enough because they drift infield and the do not have the pace to get in behind.

How can we drop these two? not going to happen so unless we play 4-1-2-1 2 or or 4-2-2-2 we are stuck 3-5-2 unless the squad is remodelled heavily (which would require a new boardroom I think)

All the formations I suggest we can play with this squad and undroppables leave us narrow upfront, relying on fullbacks or wingbacks for width.
 
We just do not have the personnel to play this formation consistently. They most important part of the formation is the defense and we do not have the quality or the numbers there. In a 3-5-2 you need central defenders who can bring the ball out of the back Evans is the only defender we have who is comfortable doing that. And on our squad Valencia is the only one in the squad whose style of play suits the wingback role Shaw and Rafael are not effective enough going forward to be natural for the role. Plus they are the only FBs in the squad. People complained about Smalling and Jones being used as RBs last season but, we ended up starting a right winger at Left Wingback and an attacking midfielder at Right Wingback. That is completely unacceptable.
 
Don't think formations were a problem today at all tbh and we changed it thrice over anyway in game which caused more instability.

Problem today was a shitty almost scared performance first half and Injuries before the game with players missing.
 
I think we missed Welbeck today -- his ability to stretch teams (with his speed, running into channels and goal threat) opens up more possibilities for the other central players in a 3-5-2 formation.
 
For me our individual player IQ is just not high enough for this. The back three were often way to spread an the space between the 3 the 5 and the 2 was just far to sparse. I think Swansea exploited that perfectly on the counter. They got in and moved the ball around and then broke. It wasn't just straight counter attacking it to me was 'smart' counter attacking.

Was happy to see the way we pressed quite early in the first half but after we were a goal down I was glad to see him switch back to a 4-4-2 for Januzaj to stay forward. He should have moved Fletcher to right back and shifted everybody over and moved Young up and brought Felaini on to hold. I thought that was a bit of a tactical error.
 
WE need midfielders. Good ones.

I reckon minimum as good as Carrick 2012/2013. Just look at our team in that time. With poor wingers, we could still won the league by depending on RVP and Carrick. And obviously a proper formation which can carry out the best of the team.
 
I reckon minimum as good as Carrick 2012/2013. Just look at our team in that time. With poor wingers, we could still won the league by depending on RVP and Carrick. And obviously a proper formation which can carry out the best of the team.
Would be suicide with three at the back. Carrick circa 12/13 defended like swiss cheese.
 
I reckon minimum as good as Carrick 2012/2013. Just look at our team in that time. With poor wingers, we could still won the league by depending on RVP and Carrick. And obviously a proper formation which can carry out the best of the team.
Don't forget that in the run in we had Vidic come back and a reliable defence. Defence plays a huge part and ours currently is just so poor.
 
Don't forget that in the run in we had Vidic come back and a reliable defence. Defence plays a huge part and ours currently is just so poor.

Vidic missed half of the season. Evans and Rio were the huge part in our defense. We still have Evans. I don't think Rio in that season was better than the current Smalling and Jones. We might need a right back since Rafael in that season wasn't an injury prone.
 
Vidic missed half of the season. Evans and Rio were the huge part in our defense. We still have Evans. I don't think Rio in that season was better than the current Smalling and Jones. We might need a right back since Rafael in that season wasn't an injury prone.
I thought Rio was pretty good that season personally, got into the team of the year anyhow. And Vidic played a big part once he came back from injury in the second half, first half we were leaking goals but scoring loads, opposite in the second half.
Evans I don't think has improved since then, if anything just become more injury prone, just like Rafael.

I think our defence would be good if they stayed fit. Hard to form some consistency when your right back constantly picks up niggles, the new left back is out for a month right away, and the 3 center backs we have are all known to pick up injury after injury.
 
I thought Rio was pretty good that season personally, got into the team of the year anyhow. And Vidic played a big part once he came back from injury in the second half, first half we were leaking goals but scoring loads, opposite in the second half.
Evans I don't think has improved since then, if anything just become more injury prone, just like Rafael.

I think our defence would be good if they stayed fit. Hard to form some consistency when your right back constantly picks up niggles, the new left back is out for a month right away, and the 3 center backs we have are all known to pick up injury after injury.

Rio was really good in that season. What I'm trying to say is Jones and Smalling current level are similar with the Rio Ferdinand 2012/2013.
Vidic didn't play that much even when he came back. Obviously due of fitness. So I can't say he played a bigger part than Evans. Well, if we have the same Carrick, the same Evans and the same Rio including the same Rafael then that should be a minimum requirement to get top 3 or challenging the title.

I don't think Smalling and Jones are proven to pick up injury after injury. Rafael is the one who make people think like that. Smalling played about 40 games last season and more than 50% of it he played as a right back. Not to mention he is proven play many games and played a big part in 2010/2011 season.
Jones is indeed pick up more injuries than Smalling, but in 2 and half season Jones already played 100 matches with us. That considers as a lot of games despite with how many centre backs we have in those time.
 
Rio was really good in that season. What I'm trying to say is Jones and Smalling current level are similar with the Rio Ferdinand 2012/2013.
Vidic didn't play that much even when he came back. Obviously due of fitness. So I can't say he played a bigger part than Evans. Well, if we have the same Carrick, the same Evans and the same Rio including the same Rafael then that should be a minimum requirement to get top 3 or challenging the title.

I don't think Smalling and Jones are proven to pick up injury after injury. Rafael is the one who make people think like that. Smalling played about 40 games last season and more than 50% of it he played as a right back. Not to mention he is proven play many games and played a big part in 2010/2011 season.
Jones is indeed pick up more injuries than Smalling, but in 2 and half season Jones already played 100 matches with us. That considers as a lot of games despite with how many centre backs we have in those time.

Vidic was our best defender in 2013 when he came back, though you are right he didn't always play. We went on a run of clean sheets as soon as he came back.
 
Let's please ditch this. I have been saying this for a long time. Let's get wingers and full backs and stick with 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1.
In a 3-5-2. The players in Mata, Rooney, LWB and RWB positions should be people who are willing to run at people and take them on. Rooney, RVP, Mata, Valencia and Young are not that kind of players. Hence our attack will lack that impetus. It's better to get wingers who can do this. Like Januzaj and some new winger.
This was even the full backs get space to attack. Which Shaw and Rafael can do.
LvG lets go the 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 formation
 
I think we got it backwards. We should've started with something more familiar and then transitioned into a 352. I like the system and think if we can learn it, it will come in handy against teams who are better.

The issue for me is while it showcases our wealth of attacking options, it exposes our weak midfield and most importantly we don't have the players to do it.

I rate our CB's but none of them can stay fit and we need 3 of them as opposed to 2. We're going to have to spend a shed load of money on a defender who depending on who we get may not be better than what we already have. They can talk about war chests, but we still will have some sort of budget and at least 20 million of it will be taken away because we need bodies to make 352 work.

Then there's the issue of our wing backs. Again, I rate Rafael and Shaw highly, but I'm not sure they'd make good wing backs. We're always going to look to use width, it's ingrained in this club and our players and there's nothing wrong with that. Problem is Rafael is inconsistent in attack and at this point it doesn't really matter where you play Valencia he'll still contribute nothing with the ball.

Lastly, LvG has already stated that he wants to use a 433 in the future. To me it seems pointless to pay big money for players who we may not need in the future like Rojo and Blind just to make the 352 work in the short term.
 
We can't play a 3-5-2 against teams who are worse than us unless we press relentlessly in the defense. The tactic works wonders when the opponents feels pressured to constantly try to break down our defense as it opens up a lot of chances for a counter.

But if it is 0-0 and we are playing Swansea then we need to aggressively win the ball back, not sit back and wait for them. Most of our ball wins today came from the back five, only two tackles came from the rest of the team. Most of our interceptions(8 from our non defenders) also came from passive play rather than forcing the errors.

There doesn't seem to be a complete system on how to win the ball back like LVG has in his 4-3-3's. Mata and the two strikers needs to get much more involved in the defense work.

Remove Januzaj and Nani and the rest of the team made 7 dribbles and that was Rooney having a brilliant day in that regards. It is incredibly difficult to break down an organized defense without making a single dribble to open up space and we could see that with us having 0 through-balls as a team in the entire match.

54 long-balls however shows that the system is more suited to a very direct counter attacking style rather than trying to break down teams.
 
I can't believe people doom the formation after one stinking game. Should we rather revert back to the good old 442 and die of boredom while we try to win the crossing league? Also, only signing Herrera will not solve our problems in central midfield. Fletcher, Cleverley and Anderson are simply not good enough, and Carrick is not getting any younger.

When we get back Evans, Rafael and Shaw, we will be much more solid in defense.

-------------------DDG--------------------
------Jones-------Evans--------Smalling----
Rafael------Herrera-----New CM*--------Shaw

*A box to box midfielder or a solid DM
The great thing about 3(5) at the back, is the amount of flexibility it gives up front. We have plenty of attacking options, and it would be dumb not to use them. We can play 3412 like yesterday :
------------Mata/Kagawa----------
---------RvP----------Rooney-----

Or 343
Januzaj---------RvP--------Free pick

Or even 541 in tough games or against opponents who play 433 or wide 442's
-------------------DDG--------------------
------Jones-------Evans--------Smalling----
Rafael---------------------------------Shaw
----------Herrera-----New CM*------------
------Mata---------------------Rooney-----
-----------------RvP-----------------------

Sure, three CB's and wingbacks means we will often be outnumbered in wide areas, but it also means we should outnumber other teams in the middle of the pitch.
 
4 at the back please. We need a proper threat out wide, and if the manager doesn't think we have that then go and buy one. This isn't international football, use the fecking market instead of this awful blunt formation.
 
We can't play a 3-5-2 against teams who are worse than us unless we press relentlessly in the defense. The tactic works wonders when the opponents feels pressured to constantly try to break down our defense as it opens up a lot of chances for a counter.

But if it is 0-0 and we are playing Swansea then we need to aggressively win the ball back, not sit back and wait for them. Most of our ball wins today came from the back five, only two tackles came from the rest of the team. Most of our interceptions(8 from our non defenders) also came from passive play rather than forcing the errors.

There doesn't seem to be a complete system on how to win the ball back like LVG has in his 4-3-3's. Mata and the two strikers needs to get much more involved in the defense work.

Remove Januzaj and Nani and the rest of the team made 7 dribbles and that was Rooney having a brilliant day in that regards. It is incredibly difficult to break down an organized defense without making a single dribble to open up space and we could see that with us having 0 through-balls as a team in the entire match.

54 long-balls however shows that the system is more suited to a very direct counter attacking style rather than trying to break down teams.

Are those stats broken down into the two halves?
 
I can't believe people doom the formation after one stinking game. Should we rather revert back to the good old 442 and die of boredom while we try to win the crossing league? Also, only signing Herrera will not solve our problems in central midfield. Fletcher, Cleverley and Anderson are simply not good enough, and Carrick is not getting any younger.

When we get back Evans, Rafael and Shaw, we will be much more solid in defense.

-------------------DDG--------------------
------Jones-------Evans--------Smalling----
Rafael------Herrera-----New CM*--------Shaw

*A box to box midfielder or a solid DM
The great thing about 3(5) at the back, is the amount of flexibility it gives up front. We have plenty of attacking options, and it would be dumb not to use them. We can play 3412 like yesterday :
------------Mata/Kagawa----------
---------RvP----------Rooney-----

Or 343
Januzaj---------RvP--------Free pick

Or even 541 in tough games or against opponents who play 433 or wide 442's
-------------------DDG--------------------
------Jones-------Evans--------Smalling----
Rafael---------------------------------Shaw
----------Herrera-----New CM*------------
------Mata---------------------Rooney-----
-----------------RvP-----------------------

Sure, three CB's and wingbacks means we will often be outnumbered in wide areas, but it also means we should outnumber other teams in the middle of the pitch.

Yeah Im with you. I mean, if we'd played well in the formation but been unable to break down Swansea and it'd finished 0-0 you could say that the formation was at fault. But the slow speed of passing and numerous mistakes weren't exactly the fault of the formation. You might argue that the players weren't comfy in it, which is reasonable, and probably why we switched to 4-4-1-1. However we have only been at it for about a month.

Its also worth pointing out that we completely fell apart at the end yesterday, when we had four at the back. Totally lost all structure and ended up lobbing long balls to Fellaini. Hardly preferable.
 
Yeah Im with you. I mean, if we'd played well in the formation but been unable to break down Swansea and it'd finished 0-0 you could say that the formation was at fault. But the slow speed of passing and numerous mistakes weren't exactly the fault of the formation. You might argue that the players weren't comfy in it, which is reasonable, and probably why we switched to 4-4-1-1. However we have only been at it for about a month.

Its also worth pointing out that we completely fell apart at the end yesterday, when we had four at the back. Totally lost all structure and ended up lobbing long balls to Fellaini. Hardly preferable.

He cant switch if thats the formation he chooses. You have to lose playing it and lose playing it until they get it. Because your right it was the players not the formation which was failing. Changing back to 4-4- whatever........thats defeatist.
 
I think the 3-5-2 could still work, though yesterday their simply wasn't enough pace in the side for it to work effectively. I think the reason it worked so well in pre-season was due to the fact we had pace up front with Welbeck and also in the wing back positions with Valencia and Young/Shaw.
 
It does? How so?

For a start, there's the obvious issue with us needing three CBs every game, when we only have three available that have any experience but are all crocks.

It also relies on having a shit hot midfield that supply for the strikers and cover for defenders. I don't really need to explain why this is an issue.

The system encourages slow, lethargic play which I don't think suits this league at all. Watch it around Europe and it's always the same. I've seen it, or variations of it, in Series A quite a bit. It's boring and generally better suited to winning a war of attrition on the pitch. In yesterdays circumstances it was evident, behind by a goal and had to completely change the shape to get back in it.

It's inflexible. You need to make substitutions to really change the shape unless you have many good, versatile players.

It'll probably be used to shoehorn RVP and Rooney into the team, which we already know doesn't work.

It puts a big emphasis on the quality of defenders too, both on and off the ball. They spend a lot if the time with the ball and I think Van Gaal is clearly expecting a certain level of creativity from them eg LCB stretches play by switching to the RWB. Luckily Blackett did well here. For some reason, however, with the high line, it seems completely open to runners from deep. Though I'm sure our players are smart enough to sort this out.

In attack I just think we look completely lost without width. Our players have all grown up and played that way. I think LVG is giving himself too much to do to change that and keep us on the right road this season.
 
I'm not a fan of 3-5-2 or 3-4-3 depending on the player on the field

I really think that our formation is made to accommodate RVP Roo and Mata, but always said it should be the two of them and not the three because of our weak midfield, wingers and our weak defense.

Van Gaal to be in full power must play in a 4-3-3 and I think that he has some player ready for that but too many players in the same positions and few in the important ones

Despite trying to play a 3-5-2 without winger, without pace, Van Gaal should have tried to play in a 4-3-3 and get rid of some players sooner
 
LVG has already admitted we are playing 3-5-2 due to necessity, rather than through first choice. He want's to play 4-3-3 but we "don't have the specialist wingers".
 
He says he does not have specialist wingers but it's not like Young and Valencia are Roberto Carlos and Cafu, he doesn't have specialist wing backs either.

I think we will buy without a doubt, the club needs top four, money is available and if they continue to increase commercial income at the rate they are then they will only make massive amounts in the future so I do not think they are averse to spending another £100m.

Vidal will take too much of this, I would sooner sign 2 wingers and Rojo (CB that can play LB). Carrick should be fine as a number 6 and Herrera as an 8, Fletcher and Cleverley will just have to do as a back up, I would even try to sign a number 8 or 6 for around £10m that could do a job.

We could then play 4-3-3 with:

RVP and Welbeck as back up to Rooney

Januzaj and two new wingers like Di Maria and Cuadrado competing for those positions and then somebody else as fourth choice

Kagawa and Mata as a number 10 competition.

Herrera, Carrick, Fletcher, Cleverley and a De Jong like cheap central midfielder.

Rojo, Jones, Smalling, Evans and Blackett at centre back.

Our right back depth will be weak but Jones will just have to be second choice to Rafael.

I would be happy with that personally for this season.

The problem, LvG says his captain always plays. That means if he wants 4-3-3 then Rooney cannot be dropped even though Mata and RVP might be a stronger combination.