I strongly disagree with some of this. We have played three games this month thus far. I'll quickly "analyse" how well both have done in these performances. Young was very poor against Liverpool - apart from one great ball into the box, he was a poor outlet for us. Valencia, on the other hand, changed the complexion of our wing by himself, as a right back. (Valencia the better player in this game.) Against Crystal Palace, Young was quite clearly better. And against Bayer Leverkusen, Valencia had a good time exploiting Leverkusen's left-hand side, registering one assist and scoring a goal. Young came on and did well, but he wasn't better. Overall, I'd agree that Young is better than Valencia because he has slightly more - which isn't saying much - variety in his game. Valencia's game, however, is much more than using the byline as code... He is one of our best pressers and covers well at right back. I also think it's farcical to use Young's pre-assist to portray that he is an intelligent player, or in this case - more intelligent than Valencia. You've isolated one good event out of the many poor attempts at Young trying to think intelligently (see Young vs Crystal Palace, for example).