FromTheBench
Full Member
- Joined
- May 3, 2014
- Messages
- 10,617
What's the position regarding the morality of signing Alonso after the Greenwood saga?
Tweet is gone - what did I miss?This fecking scumbag better not get anywhere near the club. We’re not that desperate.
Marca saying we are offering Alonso a 2 year deal. Thats crazy.
Don't believe it for a second, but if there's any chance it's true then I expect Arnautovic mk2 climb down incomingMarca saying we are offering Alonso a 2 year deal. Thats crazy.
Marca saying we are offering Alonso a 2 year deal. Thats crazy.
Tweet is gone - what did I miss?
22 year old with a year remaining on his contract if what I've just read is true.
Just play Fernandez if that’s the alternative surely
22 year old with a year remaining on his contract if what I've just read is true.
What's the position regarding the morality of signing Alonso after the Greenwood saga?
It just doesn't really make sense signing another left back.
Unless Malacia and Shaw are out for months
Getting us a man who can do both would be the dream.no signing of killers or rapists, just players that have played under ten hag or in the dutch league.
Shaw could be out for 3 months and Malacia is far off a return. We would be leaving ourselves stupidly short at full back if we didn't sign one.It just doesn't really make sense signing another left back. We have Shaw, Malacia, and Dalot who can play there. And that's without dipping into the U21's. Unless Malacia and Shaw are out for months it just seems a bit pointless to me. Even if Dalot is playing there and Wan Bissaka get's injured, it's not like we can't play Lindelof at right back either so depth really doesn't seem like an issue to me.
We struggled in the first 3 matches with a seemingly fit starting 11. What could go wrong when we start playing multiple players in unnatural positions for multiple weeks? Getting natural cover is not the worst idea.It just doesn't really make sense signing another left back. We have Shaw, Malacia, and Dalot who can play there. And that's without dipping into the U21's. Unless Malacia and Shaw are out for months it just seems a bit pointless to me. Even if Dalot is playing there and Wan Bissaka get's injured, it's not like we can't play Lindelof at right back either so depth really doesn't seem like an issue to me.
Agree.It just doesn't really make sense signing another left back. We have Shaw, Malacia, and Dalot who can play there. And that's without dipping into the U21's. Unless Malacia and Shaw are out for months it just seems a bit pointless to me. Even if Dalot is playing there and Wan Bissaka get's injured, it's not like we can't play Lindelof at right back either so depth really doesn't seem like an issue to me.
You've just answered your own question.
Is any of that actually confirmed?Shaw could be out for 3 months and Malacia is far off a return. We would be leaving ourselves stupidly short at full back if we didn't sign one.
It's not that unnatural though is it. Dalot has played left back a ton in his career, and has always been adequate. Lindelof is also fine at right back. It all depends on how long Shaw and Malacia are out though.We struggled in the first 3 matches with a seemingly fit starting 11. What could go wrong when we start playing multiple players in unnatural positions for multiple weeks? Getting natural cover is not the worst idea.
Cancelo will play for Barca as soon as we have enough ffp room.No Cancelo links? He has good relationship with Bruno
Is any of that actually confirmed?
It's not that unnatural though is it. Dalot has played left back a ton in his career, and has always been adequate. Lindelof is also fine at right back. It all depends on how long Shaw and Malacia are out though.
Shaw and Malacia. As of now we have 0 natural LBs in our first team squad.I don't get it. Is being without Shaw for a few months so much of a crisis that it's our top priority, over a number of permanent needs? And what are we going to do with three left backs once he's back?