Sandikan
aka sex on the beach
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2011
- Messages
- 56,345
Can only thing he's been watching that one game v Leeds on repeat.Are we watching the same player?
Can only thing he's been watching that one game v Leeds on repeat.Are we watching the same player?
Somebody like Moyes would happily spunk £30 million on this chuffer.
If the club was in any way competent then we’d get rid and bring in another central midfielder to complement Casemiro.
Can only thing he's been watching that one game v Leeds on repeat.
McT is not really a hill to day on mate. He should be sold and If someone offer 20m bite their hand off and run. Fred on the other hand, we'd be lucky if anyone offers 15m as it stands nobody wants him, even with a year on his contract only. Both should leave.Two games we have played this season. Both games Fred has been hooked at HT. Both games we have looked better in the second half once he was off the pitch.
Against Brentford, Fred was a part of why we shipped 4 goals. McTominay came on and for the first ~25 mins was our best player, but he then started to get sloppy.
With Fred, you are guaranteeing that he gifts the ball to the opposition 3-4 times per game in dangerous positions, often leading to goals or chances conceded. Yes, he is a far more limited player than McTominay.
I was starting to think I am in the wrong thread.Are we watching the same player?
Two games we have played this season. Both games Fred has been hooked at HT. Both games we have looked better in the second half once he was off the pitch.
Against Brentford, Fred was a part of why we shipped 4 goals. McTominay came on and for the first ~25 mins was our best player, but he then started to get sloppy.
With Fred, you are guaranteeing that he gifts the ball to the opposition 3-4 times per game in dangerous positions, often leading to goals or chances conceded. Yes, he is a far more limited player than McTominay.
I disagree personally. Fred is a more limited player - he is sloppy, technically average, physically weak and basically just a good workhorse. He also is older with less room for improvement, higher wages, no homegrown status, no positional versatility.
McTominay is a good physical asset, good at resisting the press and beating players on the turn in midfield, at carrying the ball forwards and passing between the lines to attackers. He is also sometimes sloppy, and his defensive positioning/awareness is among the worst I have ever seen.
Between the two I would take McTominay, and that’s not counting the non-pitch stuff like wages, age and homegrown status.
But..but..but..Redcafe tells me that he wouldn't get into promotion chasing championship teams!!
What are these solid mid to Europe chasing PL teams thinking? Don't they know he can't get into the Scotland midfield?
But..but..but..Redcafe tells me that he wouldn't get into promotion chasing championship teams!!
What are these solid mid to Europe chasing PL teams thinking? Don't they know he can't get into the Scotland midfield?
This is usually how the step down from United first team works. Cleverley and Gibson were both bought by Everton for instance. McT moving to another PL team proves nothing until he actually delivers there.
Agreed. Donny is a total deadweight.We need Scott as a squad player
He is a decent squad player and we don’t have enough midfielders
I would rather we sell Donny than Scot
McTom was the best player?! You're joking, he couldn't pass water.
The reason we looked better was because Brentford eased off from their ferocious start and ew took our miniscule centre back off.
Any impact from McTom - in, let's not forget, holding Brentford to a goalless second half, shouldn't be overstated.
Fred’s worst attributes (his sloppiness, as you highlight) are heightened when we play him deeper. When he’s played to press higher up the pitch then he generally does a good job. McTominay doesn’t do a good job anywhere sadly.
Come on Moyes...you know you want him!! DO IT !
ot top 4 or even top 6 quality , but he will do well at another club, any other club.
We'd probably get more for Garner to be honestGet rid and give Garner his minutes.
I disagree personally. Fred is a more limited player - he is sloppy, technically average, physically weak and basically just a good workhorse. He also is older with less room for improvement, higher wages, no homegrown status, no positional versatility.
McTominay is a good physical asset, good at resisting the press and beating players on the turn in midfield, at carrying the ball forwards and passing between the lines to attackers. He is also sometimes sloppy, and his defensive positioning/awareness is among the worst I have ever seen.
Between the two I would take McTominay, and that’s not counting the non-pitch stuff like wages, age and homegrown status.
McTom was the best player?! You're joking, he couldn't pass water.
The reason we looked better was because Brentford eased off from their ferocious start and ew took our miniscule centre back off.
Any impact from McTom - in, let's not forget, holding Brentford to a goalless second half, shouldn't be overstated.
I'd like to us to sell Scott and sign this Mctominay.McTominay is a good physical asset, good at resisting the press and beating players on the turn in midfield, at carrying the ball forwards and passing between the lines to attackers.
I doubt that but that's besides my point. I feel Garner has the potential to be a good player for us, I think Scott's proven that he doesn't.We'd probably get more for Garner to be honest
Why are we always linked with sending players on loan? No more loans! If ANY player above the age of 20 is deemed so surplus to requirements that they can disappear for a year to another team then get them sold!
McTominay's wage isn't that high. Clubs like West Ham and Newcastle can easily afford to match what he earns hereWages. Wages. Wages.
Too many of our players are on too much money to warrant a transfer fee and a club matching their wages.
But he doesn't utilize it enough.He's worth keeping as a squad player. Decent goal threat and his height is an advantage coming off the bench
I've said before that I expect he'll got to a midtable team first, but then there's an above 50% chance that within two or three years he'll have to drop further to a relegation fighting team. Other's have said the same.But..but..but..Redcafe tells me that he wouldn't get into promotion chasing championship teams!!
What are these solid mid to Europe chasing PL teams thinking? Don't they know he can't get into the Scotland midfield?
Normally the case, but here McTominay is a player whose salary is able to met by the type of clubs interested in him.Wages. Wages. Wages.
Too many of our players are on too much money to warrant a transfer fee and a club matching their wages.
Normally the case, but here McTominay is a player whose salary is able to met by the type of clubs interested in him.
Fred has spent almost his entire time with us playing the deeper role, trying to be both the more defensively sound one and expected to be the closest thing we've got to a deep-lying playmaker. Neither of which suit him at all and only highlight his weaknesses. The only time he got a run of games in a more advanced role he was one of our better players. Whereas McTominay has spent most of his time playing next to Fred, with he himself being the one with a bit more freedom. Obviously it wasn't an outright attacking midfielder, but he was able to get forward and around the opposition box. Rangnick came in and switched their roles and instantly Fred looked far better than McTominay ever has. Interestingly Scott actually did look good for the first few weeks in that deeper role as well, but he quickly dropped off and was poor for the rest of the season.Ah yes, the infallible logic of "when he does something wrong, hes shit. when he does something right or the team plays better with him, its pure luck"
Funnily enough I would say largely the same thing about McTominay. His worst attributes (defensive awareness/positioning) are heightened when we play him deeper. When he is able to play his more natural attacking box-to-box role he looks a lot better. Fred doesnt do a good job anywhere sadly.
Either way, we definitely need to get rid of one of them and our team will look better as a result. Personally I would prefer we ditched Fred for the reasons I have mentioned - he brings nothing to the team except being a headless chicken charging around the middle of the pitch and presenting opponents with an easy target to press. McTominay can be a goal threat, he can carry the ball, he is strong in the air and physically. McTominay is much younger, on much lower wages, counts towards our homegrown quota and is more flexible positionally than Fred too.