Scott McTominay | Napoli

We sold this guy and kept crap on the payroll. The most damage done by ETH is this one.
We needed to sell him due to bad transfers over the past few years. We was making no profit what so ever. We’re selling everyone for much less than we signed them for.
 
Up to a point Amorim probably would have liked to have Mctominay, certainly early on, but given what we know now about our finances his sale was clearly vital.

Garnacho next to keep the books balanced, and to give Amorim some cash.
 
It's not a maximum of two when Milan have about 6!

If non-EU players can just be classed as EU players, then there's not a limit on non-EU players.
It's two every season , first one can be registered no issues , for second one its one in one out .
 
McTominay is the new Welbeck. Every time he scores a goal the threads getting bumped with "told you we shouldn't have sold him".

I'm glad he's doing well but it was the right call to swap him for Ugarte.
A rare deal that was good for all parties. Genuinely pleased that he’s smashing it over there and hope we wins the league.
 
He'd definitely have gotten games and goals, but I get the feeling that, without selling Scott, we wouldn't have signed Ugarte, and we all love him.

I agree completely.

The unforgivable thing is that a club of our size and revenues, has reached a position where we have to sell academy developed players in order to spend £50m on a midfielder.
 
What is the limit in Serie A? I know Milan have a ton of non-EU players (RLC, Tomori, Abraham, Pulisic, Emerson Royal and Chukwueze).

It's transfers per year not overall players in the squad. Abraham won't count as he transferred from another Italian team. Pulisic has Croatian nationality.

The rules seem to be tweaked quite often so I don't fully know the extent of it anymore
 
What an utterly pointless rule.
Different from country to country which is the frustrating part

England - play as many foreigners as you like. Ironic.
Spain - maximum of 5 but limit on 3 per matchday squad
Germany - no restrictions
France - maximum of 4
 
Different from country to country which is the frustrating part

England - play as many foreigners as you like. Ironic.
Spain - maximum of 5 but limit on 3 per matchday squad
Germany - no restrictions
France - maximum of 4


I'd personally prefer if they did it a different way. 4 out of the starting 11 needs to be eligible to play for the national side of whatever league you're in.
 
I would love it if Mctominay wins the league with Napoli. Lukaku, Sanchez, Mkhitaryan and Darmian also won seria A after leaving United
 
Underrated by a majority of United fans when he was here.

I would've loved to have kept him in the squad. He could've been a good squad option as one of Amorim's number 10's...

wasn't to be.

I'm glad he's doing well at Napoli
 
We sold this guy and kept crap on the payroll. The most damage done by ETH is this one.

Calm down, he’s scored 4 league goals for Napoli, he’s hardly tearing Serie A to shreds.

He was a decent player for us who has gone to a league and coach that better suit him.
 
It's transfers per year not overall players in the squad. Abraham won't count as he transferred from another Italian team. Pulisic has Croatian nationality.

The rules seem to be tweaked quite often so I don't fully know the extent of it anymore

Also, i believe English players are given EU status in the Serie A since last season, which is something that has helped Milan considerably.
 
I agree completely.

The unforgivable thing is that a club of our size and revenues, has reached a position where we have to sell academy developed players in order to spend £50m on a midfielder.
I think focussing on the amount of money is one way for his fans to rectify the transfer and it is legit, no doubt. But at the same time, he wasn't the solution to any of our problems. At no point. A midfielder that scores somewhat regularly is great of course - but only if he is at least decent in the core midfield aspects. McTominay wasn't. He wasn't a midfielder, he wasn't a defender and he wasn't a striker. For some systems, he could be turned into a player that has more upsides than downsides, as we can kind of see at Napoli now, but United at this point have to adress their midfield issues and their scoring issues and the answer on those questions was never Scott McTominay.
 
This might sound a bit crazy but I think he's one of the best midfielders around currently at doing the Lampard run into a box or edge of the box and finish.
Nothing crazy. Underrated player. He was and still is not worse than 100m central midfield players going two years ago. Rice, Caciedo and so on. In Premier League.

We did huge misstake selling him. Everybody knows that.
 
Nothing crazy. Underrated player. He was and still is not worse than 100m central midfield players going two years ago. Rice, Caciedo and so on. In Premier League.

We did huge misstake selling him. Everybody knows that.
Yeah buddy, pretty sure thats not correct.
 
It's not a maximum of two when Milan have about 6!

If non-EU players can just be classed as EU players, then there's not a limit on non-EU players.
First it is EEA, not EU… For exemple, Norwegian players enjoy the exact same rights as EU players.

Switzerland and the UK are also a particular case in terms of movement freedom, it is up to interpretation and the Italian federation has chosen to avoid restrictions on them, probably because clubs lobbied to have it that way. …
 
What is the limit in Serie A? I know Milan have a ton of non-EU players (RLC, Tomori, Abraham, Pulisic, Emerson Royal and Chukwueze).
They changed it again before this season, but basically, you have a number of slots per season to sign non-EU players from outside the league(with # of national team caps required for the last slot), which changes from 2 to 3 depending on how many non-EU players you already have under contract. There's a one player exception for british and albanian players, so you clubs can sign one british player(and one albanian) without it counting against the non-EU slots
 
I think focussing on the amount of money is one way for his fans to rectify the transfer and it is legit, no doubt. But at the same time, he wasn't the solution to any of our problems. At no point. A midfielder that scores somewhat regularly is great of course - but only if he is at least decent in the core midfield aspects. McTominay wasn't. He wasn't a midfielder, he wasn't a defender and he wasn't a striker. For some systems, he could be turned into a player that has more upsides than downsides, as we can kind of see at Napoli now, but United at this point have to adress their midfield issues and their scoring issues and the answer on those questions was never Scott

Only if you’re a bit dim.

A footballer who gets the club, is a great trainer, never causes hassle, is happy to sit on the bench and can regularly come off it to score important goals when chasing games is the answer to plenty of problems and always will be.

Especially for a club that struggles to score goals and see out games or break a deadlock as badly as we do.
 
He was scoring more often for us last season. 5 goals 2 assists in 17 starts and 1 sub, while he had 7 goals and 1 assist in 18 starts and 14 subs for us. A goal every 270.4 mins for Utd last season and a goal every 305 mins for Napoli
 
Only if you’re a bit dim.
Hmm, not a very pleasant start...
A footballer who gets the club, is a great trainer, never causes hassle, is happy to sit on the bench and can regularly come off it to score important goals when chasing games is the answer to plenty of problems and always will be.
It sure is. Uniteds biggest issue right now and for quite some time is that the 1st team is not a great football team. Having a good option on the bench is nice but not a priority given the forementioned issue.

getting the club
great trainer
never causes hassle

If those are the things that pop up first when trying to "sell" the value of footballer, I'd say something is already fallen into the water...

Especially for a club that struggles to score goals and see out games or break a deadlock as badly as we do.
Thats an issue. But having or not having a sub doesn't change that. The mission has to be lower the number of times we come into such situations.
 
No they haven't. It's not that simple. Can't bother to research it but I know it's not that for sure.
Can sign 1 british player per season without counting against the non-EU slots