Red Indian Chief Torn Rubber
Thus says Kemo
Nah. Its all straight up made up Bullshit. We were far better in second half. We created more, tackled more, intercepted more, out shot them (they out shot us comfortably first half: 12 - 2, 18-4 in our favour 2nd half), forced more saves out of their keeper (1 first half. 3 2nd half). Had more corners (4-1 Forrest 1st half, 4 nil United 2nd). Hit the post twice. Even Scored. Even our possesion went up by 1%... Its not even close! Even statistics irrefutably show it. The ONLY valid claim anyone can make is we were more vulnerable to the counter thanks to no natural 6 on pitch. But worse? Or "Forrest took over'? You're having laugh.Early second half we were worse. Later second half we were better. Overall I would say we were a bit better in the second half than we were in the first, but that doesn't change the first 10-15 minutes of it being worse.
Even in terms of mere passing the ball. Mainoo touched and passed the ball less times than Scott ACTUALLY did (mind you Scott had 90% pass accuracy ). Which clearly shows how poor were were in first half in comparison, because Mainoo ALWAYS shows for the ball.
We all know Scott's limitations. But people don't have to make shit up about him, and his performance on the day just to try and lay the blame at his feet for something that was entirely his coach's fault. Honestly our fans should be better than this.....
Last edited: