lex talionis
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2017
- Messages
- 15,838
His stash of photos of all his managers must be epic.
I don’t think he is the new whipping boy. He is being held to the standards of an experienced professional now.He was definitely better yesterday than in his last start vs Brighton. But I see he is the new whipping boy and will likely get 4/10 ratings from many regardless of how he plays...
I don’t think he is the new whipping boy. He is being held to the standards of an experienced professional now.
We can’t continue watching him with developmental eyes. It’s the same reason Rashford is getting the heat too right now.
Some are even trying to keep the expectations low by comparing his stats to Hannibal.
I know to listen to some you’d think he was a youth player straight out of the academy not someone with 200 appearances under his belt.Indeed, I get the feeling people think he is younger than he is...
He is 27 in December.
It's simple: the player should have the quality to be, at the very least, a useful squad player for a title challenging side. Someone who can do a good job for a team that belongs to the actual elite.People here keep talking garbage like McT and many other players are not “United quality”.
after these many years, still using “not united quality”, it’s laughable. Think about it. Don’t you think it ridiculous? What’s the so-called United quality? Can those people give me an explicit, clear definition?
He was definitely better yesterday than in his last start vs Brighton. But I see he is the new whipping boy and will likely get 4/10 ratings from many regardless of how he plays...
Or maybe people need to accept that McT isn't the be all and end all of United's issues.People need to feck off with accusing legitimate criticism as scapegoating, it's completely disingenuous and a complete cop-out of a response.
People here keep talking garbage like McT and many other players are not “United quality”.
after these many years, still using “not united quality”, it’s laughable. Think about it. Don’t you think it ridiculous? What’s the so-called United quality? Can those people give me an explicit, clear definition?
It was a 4 or 5 out ten performance yesterday, I’m sure that’s what he’ll have been given in the media, wasn’t even as high as that in the first half. Not really a whipping boy he just isn’t very good and never will be.
No one has ever said he was.Or maybe people need to accept that McT isn't the be all and end all of United's issues.
It was a 4 or 5 out ten performance yesterday, I’m sure that’s what he’ll have been given in the media, wasn’t even as high as that in the first half. Not really a whipping boy he just isn’t very good and never will be.
I don’t think he is the new whipping boy. He is being held to the standards of an experienced professional now.
We can’t continue watching him with developmental eyes. It’s the same reason Rashford is getting the heat too right now.
Some are even trying to keep the expectations low by comparing his stats to Hannibal.
I thought he was fairly poor, but did improve toward the end of the match. He is much better for Scotland.Player reviews should be based on what the player did, not by how old they are. McTominay did his job yesterday. He wasn't exceptional, but he was an important cog in our midfield that helped us win the game. Against Brighton he was awful. Yesterday, he was ok.
I think you missed my point.Player reviews should be based on what the player did, not by how old they are. McTominay did his job yesterday. He wasn't exceptional, but he was an important cog in our midfield that helped us win the game. Against Brighton he was awful. Yesterday, he was ok.
I think you missed my point.
Fans are holding him to higher standards now as compared to years past. It should not necessarily be seen as scapegoating.
Fans expect him to play like someone that is done it for years in United colours. Rotation players are still expected to carry out their duties properly when called up on.So you think the fans think he's better than he really is? And because of this he should perform to that level? He's a player who can do a job. He's not a starter and never should have been. He's a guy who can rotate in and offer things that players like Erikson and Mount can't. He is not a 7 or 8 out of 10 player. He is an average player. But it seems as though our fans are looking for the bad from him. He could make 9 great passes in a row (in theory) but if his 10th gets picked off they will see "there he goes giving it away again". He is in fact, the new whipping boy
But it wasn't. It was at the very least a 6. Nothing great, but not a liability. In the Brighton game he deserved all the bad reviews he got. He was invisible and barely touched the ball. But yesterday he was a lot better. Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying he should be in our starting 11 week in and week out. I just don't think he should be the new whipping boy now that Maguire doesn't play
That's close to retirement age. I dun believe it.Indeed, I get the feeling people think he is younger than he is...
He is 27 in December.
Fans expect him to play like someone that is done it for years in United colours. Rotation players are still expected to carry out their duties properly when called up on.
It might seem irrational to you but he is now one of the longest serving players here and expectations get greater with tenure. This is in line with other senior squad status like Key players, captain and so forth.
People will pile on any player not deemed performing to their station. That’s why I used the throwaway statement of development player and leeway afforded to them. His contribution was not worse than Hannibal in my opinion but one is a newbie and the other is long serving member of the team.
The main criticism tends to be he has not developed as a player and that’s an opinion people that have watched him all through his career can feel entitled to make.
Mine is different because it’s on the extreme side but that’s not the point I was making.
He didn’t have a good game, his first half performance was really poor and he was very lucky to stay on for second half. He did improve but it was hard not to and overall no more than 5 out of ten. He really isn’t a scapegoat, he was pathetic against Brighton and Bayern and poor against Burnley. If he starts playing better and his effort levels improve he won’t get as much stick as I don’t think anyone expects much from him now.
Like I said. Some people just look for the bad when their agenda is strong. Case in point ^
Obvious troll is obvious.Quoted for truth
Interesting….
You’ll make a lot of point if he doesn’t play like one of the worst player in the team consistently. We’re just calling it as it is.So you think the fans think he's better than he really is? And because of this he should perform to that level? He's a player who can do a job. He's not a starter and never should have been. He's a guy who can rotate in and offer things that players like Erikson and Mount can't. He is not a 7 or 8 out of 10 player. He is an average player. But it seems as though our fans are looking for the bad from him. He could make 9 great passes in a row (in theory) but if his 10th gets picked off they will see "there he goes giving it away again". He is in fact, the new whipping boy
I’ve said it, he’s making a mockery of our academy which supposedly places emphasis of technique over physique.The club has blown up his ego, talking about him as a future Captain when he should have been working on basics.
It was clear as soon as he came into the team he was nowhere near good enough and required huge improvement. The fact so many aspects of his game have not improved says a lot about the club and Mctominay.
People here keep talking garbage like McT and many other players are not “United quality”.
after these many years, still using “not united quality”, it’s laughable. Think about it. Don’t you think it ridiculous? What’s the so-called United quality? Can those people give me an explicit, clear definition?
Players like McTominay is why that phrase has lost all meaning, because the club is blind to mediocrity as long as the player comes from the academy.People here keep talking garbage like McT and many other players are not “United quality”.
after these many years, still using “not united quality”, it’s laughable. Think about it. Don’t you think it ridiculous? What’s the so-called United quality? Can those people give me an explicit, clear definition?
He was definitely better yesterday than in his last start vs Brighton. But I see he is the new whipping boy and will likely get 4/10 ratings from many regardless of how he plays...
It’s no more than someone having a poor game and being judged accordingly. Words like scapegoat and agenda get over used when people don’t like what they are hearing.
He could play to the best of his ability and only get a 4/10, because his ability is abysmal for a club like ours.
He's a very very poor player.
His biggest attribute for us was his determination and workrate - which should be the bare minimum for us, now he isn't even doing that. He's a shocking midfielder