Andersonson
Full Member
What does this have to do with Mctominay?
weirdos in the Mctominay thread banging keyboard about Pogba haircuts. feck’s sake
Why did you quote me? I didn't start with Pogba vs Hendo..
What does this have to do with Mctominay?
weirdos in the Mctominay thread banging keyboard about Pogba haircuts. feck’s sake
It's not just this season. Indeed he's improved a bit this season (improved from 'very poor' to just 'poor').Your point is based on a faulty premise - that Scott isn't good at pressing because he hasn't done it much this season.
He's been given the deeper sitting role under Ole, even though its not his area of expertise, because he's the best we've got there (except for Matic who has no legs left.
It's not just this season. Indeed he's improved a bit this season (improved from 'very poor' to just 'poor').
Scott has had the odd game here and there where he's actually done it well which is what gives me hope that with proper coaching he might develop that side of his game significantly. But in the majority of his games in his career so far he tends to sit off, give the opposition plenty of time to pick their pass, and then ball watches as his direct opponent runs off him into more space. Hell, it was only a couple of games ago that we had a fairly well discussed situation where Scott just jogged back after his opponent got past him, forcing Fred to come sprinting back from the other side of midfield to try to put Scott's man under pressure as he approached the box. I'm pretty sure he did the same thing at one point against Crystal Palace and it was one of the attackers who had to sprint past Scott to put pressure on the ball carrier.
The sad thing is that, despite that, he's still been better and more dependable at doing his job than Pogba and Matic.
In a disciplined 4-2-2-2 formation Van de Beek could easily play as 6 alongside Fred, especially against a team that sits back. In fact it's the perfect role for him given his strengths. You make out like McTominay didn't make any forward runs himself v Palace, he did and when he did Fred took turn sitting deeper. The same would happen if a disciplined VDB played there as well, all you have to do is let him know he has to play behind possession instead of in front of it like he has every time he's played in the double pivot. He can do everything McTominay can and better, so there's no way McTominay can play that position and VDB can't.
Worrying worry away mate.. His passing involving one touch football and his press resistance are his main strengths, along with his clinical dutch style finesse shooting. His ability to transition from defence to attack with quick one touch football is a big asset from the deep positions, so yeah it's definitely playing to his strengths. He gets a foot in and tackles up to standard for a midfielder in that position too, and his positioning is superior to McTominay where he's always moving, asking for the ball or instructing players where to play it from deep. Your only argument for him not being able to play as a no.6/no.8 in a 4-2-2-2 is because of his forward runs, when a coach like Rangnick can simply discipline/coach his game in that position like he has done with McFred after 1 game.Its actually worrying that fans thing Donny can play as a holding midfielder. perfect for him? you clearly don't know Donny's strengths then?
Donny likes to go forward, make forward runs, get in the box, all the traits that you dont want your holding midfielders to have. So you tell a player to not play to his strengths?
Worrying worry away mate.. His passing involving one touch football and his press resistance are his main strengths, along with his clinical dutch style finesse shooting. His ability to transition from defence to attack with quick one touch football is a big asset from the deep positions, so yeah it's definitely playing to his strengths. He gets a foot in and tackles up to standard for a midfielder in that position too, and his positioning is superior to McTominay where he's always moving, asking for the ball or instructing players where to play it from deep. Your only argument for him not being able to play as a no.6/no.8 in a 4-2-2-2 is because of his forward runs, when a coach like Rangnick can simply discipline/coach his game in that position like he has done with McFred after 1 game.
Obviously we need another midfielder, Matic needs replacing doesn't he? This is about McTominay, a no.8 playing as a 6, getting all the minutes showing his technical limitations on a regular basis whilst Van de Beek, a technically superior no.8 that can also play as a 6, doesn't get a sniff and deserves a fair chance after playing well in that position every time he's been used there.I guess then if Rangnick can have Donny playing in the 6/8 we don't need to sign another midfielder? Donny and Fred should be able to play that role right?
So does that mean if he doesn't play there, Rangnick is a poor coach?
I feel that with some 'proper' coaching, there will be significant improvements made to his game.
They're not "playmakers", one's a no10 having playing LW for the last 6 years, the other is an attacking minded b2b midfielder.This - we played 2 'playmakers' in DMF yesterday and neither of them looked any more or less comfortable than McTominay in receiving the ball deep areas, circulating the play etc. One of the guys played a sloppy pass resulting in a goal and the other was anonymous despite his technical talents.
Once our attacking and build-up patterns are developed, players like Fred, AWB, McTominay, Lindelof, Sancho who may have looked out of place in our individualist system will begin to flourish.