Where was he going? That was a decent pass to him and he just ran away from it.
Him being out of form is seriously costing us. He was quite good in our run last year. Today in first half, him and Fred actually played well ( not outstanding but much more calmer than our previous game).
It wasn't that bad in isolation but it's a snippet that highlights his problem. He was galloping forward wanting the ball played in front of him to run on to because that's his instinct. He's an attack minded, box to box midfielder not suited to the role we're asking him to play. A centre mid suited to the holding role or whatever you want to call it would have preempted a pass into feet, held his position, and looked to pass the ball forwards or recycle possession.
He is naturally an attacking midfielder and before his growth spurt that's where he played. Only because of his physique we tried turning him into a defensive mid. Sure, he's strong and competitive and can tackle, but he lacks the positioning and mindset both with and without the ball.
Now, plenty of players start off as being more attack minded and adjust to a deeper or more defensive role and they progress. For a long time I expected this to be the case with Scott. I bought into the hype about him from the club about his attitude, intelligence, discipline and willingness to learn, everyone from Jose to backroom staff to Ole has said the same. He also comes off well in interviews, he's bright, strong minded, resilient, determined. It seemed certain he would adapt and improve. Fact is he's been a fixture in the first team for several years now, he's had ample game time, he's into his mid 20s. And I see zero sign of improvement. Not one. He's exactly the same player at 24 that he was at 21. He used to be compared to Fletcher, and the two of them aged 21 there was some accuracy to that comparison. But comparing them as 24 year olds it would be an insult to Fletcher to put Scott in the sane bracket as him.
I very rarely post negatively about United or individual players but I can't help it with McTominay. A couple of crunching, braveheart performances against the likes of City, PSG and I think Liverpool it may have been boosted his profile, and he's been surviving on that ever since. In those games we defended deep as a unit and most of his job was just breaking up play. Those games come half a dozen times a season at most. It's a limited role that can make a half decent workhorse like Phil Neville or Scott Parker look like prime Roy Keane for 90 minutes. He simply shouldn't be on the pitch in most games we play, he's not showing any signs of improvement that he ever will be suitable.