Convert him to CB? ETH needs ball playing CB. McT also has good attitude.
It’s great PR for McT. Think about it, no matter how poor you are on the pitch [he’s usually one of the poorest] all you need to do is come out & say a few empty platitudes for a section of the fanbase to lap up.After watching rashford this season, I am having doubts whether the good speech he makes on camera are also part of PR.
After watching rashford this season, I am having doubts whether the good speech he makes on camera are also part of PR.
Scott McTominay: "The last four games are about pride for us. Going out on the pitch and showing a bit of balls in your performances and not shying away from the ball or not doing everything right." [BT Sport]
I don't get your point. Chelsea dominated the game. Thats what happens when we come up against half decent teams because our structure on and off the ball is awful.
Also, the disappearing bit is a little overstated for me. Its the typical thing where something gets said and everyone runs with it.
When we were going through an awful time of the season under Ole, McTominay was one of a very few players who stepped up and certainly didn't "disappear".
Because McTominay the player isn’t actually important. It’s all about the idea of McTominay to some at this point. Like you point out he struggles to be a ball playing midfielder but some would convert him to a CB & give the young man another 5 years to disappoint.How is he going to be ball playing centre-back when he is not even ball-playing midfielder?
Not one peep about how the manager set us up today? Did you watch the game? We sat back behind the ball in the second half and let them have it. We looked like Villarreal at Anfield.Point is that Chelsea's full back had 4 times as much of the ball as Utds centre mid. That's just appalling.
Regardless of structure off the ball, he's just not good enough on it. Doesn't look for it, doesn't demand it, doesn't want it and when he gets it his touch, vision and awareness is poor and his passing range is extremely limited.
He's just not very good, and his and Fred's lack of ability on the ball is a massive reason why this team cannot hold onto possession to build and maintain pressure in games.
I tried tying an anchor on him on several occasions but he just doesn't sink.I’m as shocked in what I’m reading too. The thing that gets me is that if another player had put up those numbers the same posters would berate them. There’s this weird thing about McTominay, lots of posters have at some point tied their flag to him so to step down & admit he’s crap is a step too far for some.
This quote now is more hilarious after not completing a pass for 39 minutes in the 2nd half today.
How do you think a team as a whole generates possession?
Exactly. Having a manager implement and coach possesion football is important but so is having footballers who can pass the football. Pep isn't going to get a team of Mctominays to dominate the ball 70 per centof the time. He's a terrible passer of the ball and aside from the odd dribble, mediocre on the ball in general. This one moment where Rashford found space in between Chelsea's defence summed it up well. The pass was easy, and could have created a good chance but Mctominay over hit it and dragged Rashford towards the corner flag.How do you think a team as a whole generates possession?
That's the problem. He's neither a good defensive midfielder nor is he good on the ball. He's basically a physically imposing player who can disrupt opponents and provide moments here and there. Basically Ole's Fellaini.Leaving aside how bad he is on the ball, what about his lack of impact off the ball? He was always chasing shadows, never in the correct position, very low intensity and half hearted attempts to get near the opposition. Just look at the difference between what he was doing and how Ronaldo was closing down the players.
This guy is just shocking at the moment.
That's the problem. He's neither a good defensive midfielder nor is he good on the ball. He's basically a physically imposing player who can disrupt opponents and provide moments here and there. Basically Ole's Fellaini.
Okay both of their Fellaini. I was under the impression that Fellaini was still relevant under Mourinho but not under Ole.Why is he Ole's Fellaini and not Jose' Fellaini?
Regarding Bruno, he was terrible on the ball, but off he ball, he was the one trying (oddly enough with Ronaldo) to win it back more than anyone else when it was with the opposition - particularly in the second half. Problem is the more desperate he gets to affect the game, the more erratic his play becomes.He's terrible but there should be threads about Rashford and Bruno who at least have some talent. Both said players are embarrassing themselves.
Scott is not or ever will be good in the midfield. Hence his CB position for Scotland.
Rashford doesn't even run and has been shitting the bed for ages now yet some of the fans still love him.The fans are easy to please. Look like you're running around and trying hard and you could be shit in a bag and they'd love you. That's what United fans are now.
I tend to agree. A couple of competent midfielders could have a transformative effect on this team both defensively and in possession. Along with a system of play and a pre season to implement it.He’s so shit it’s unbelievable. I actually said to my son, imagine how that game would have panned out if Kante and McT had swapped teams? It actually makes me hopeful. We might not need a load of new signings. Once we replace the a completely hopeless players like him with someone genuinely good it will improve the whole team to a ridiculous extent.
Scot was promoted by Mourinho. With Fletcher is debatable but McTom benefits from very poor options; kind of like Smalling did after Rio and Vidic were done and we failed to bring in quality alternatives.A worse version of Darren Fletcher. They both punched above their weight due to their Scottish nationality.
He’s so shit it’s unbelievable. I actually said to my son, imagine how that game would have panned out if Kante and McT had swapped teams? It actually makes me hopeful. We might not need a load of new signings. Once we replace the a completely hopeless players like him with someone genuinely good it will improve the whole team to a ridiculous extent.
Scot was promoted by Mourinho. With Fletcher is debatable but McTom benefits from very poor options; kind of like Smalling did after Rio and Vidic were done and we failed to bring in quality alternatives.
Our midfield's passing stats tonight:
McTominay - 27 Passes 85.2%
Matic - 42 Passes 81%
Bruno 37 Passes 73%
Fact is, 1) we're not set up to keep the ball as our movement is so stagnant, 2) none of midfielders are known to keep possession of the ball anyway.
The title obviously makes it sound worse than it is, but during the season so far, McTominay, when it comes to our midfielders, is second after Matic, with a passing percentage of 84.7%, which is better than Pogba, Bruno and Fred, who are meant to better passers of the ball, especially the former two.
Some may argue this is because they are more adventurous, but sometimes we just need someone to get their foot on the ball and dictate the pace of the game. Unfortunately, with our mdifielders, we've either got players who are too safe or too adventurous - no one in between.
We need at least two midfielders in the summer who will be able to do that. That being said, you could argue that in a more possession based system, such as the one we're expecting to see under ten Hag, passing stats would naturally go up as they'd be more players in support, we'd dominate the pitch high up, more movement, etc.
Absolutely. People think he can be improved by leaps and bounds and we all hope so, but based on what I see, he's one of the players the upgrading of whom should make a big difference to the team.He’s so shit it’s unbelievable. I actually said to my son, imagine how that game would have panned out if Kante and McT had swapped teams? It actually makes me hopeful. We might not need a load of new signings. Once we replace the a completely hopeless players like him with someone genuinely good it will improve the whole team to a ridiculous extent.
Okay both of their Fellaini. I was under the impression that Fellaini was still relevant under Mourinho but not under Ole.
I agree with you here.By having the ball.
If you look all over the first XI, none of them had that many chances or touches of the ball.
Chelsea's defenders had between 77 and 93 touches of the ball. And between 61 and 69 passes. Ours had between 33 and 39 touches with 20 and 26 passes.
You build from the back.
I'm not willing to throw any individual player under the bus till we have a real manager. Seems like I'm in the minority.