Litch
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2013
- Messages
- 10,568
Ole fav so he'll get his chance. Ok squad player but nothing other than that.....
Pretty much this. I think he's also favoured by Ole. He has character no doubt but he's average. He isn't good at anything when he has the ball.I thought I’d stay out of this thread after tonight‘s game tbh. I’ve already said all I need to say on the matter, I’ve written it a million different ways and now it’s time for whatever will be to be.
My belief has always been that he has been riding on a wave of personal fondness on here. When that wears off, and other talented new kids start emerging behind him that take their emotion, all that will be left is the player. And there’s not much there, in my opinion. In the match day thread I read a lot of people asking what’s gotten into him’ and ‘where’s the old McTominay?’. This is how he’s always played in my eyes. He wasn’t passing the ball well last October either, it’s just that people didn’t care because they were so smitten with their future captain. It was just ‘passing a little sloppy today but what a warrior’. Well he was still a warrior tonight and his passing was still sloppy. It was always just going to stop being okay all of a sudden once certain novelties wore off.
Anyway, this is my own take on things, and I’m not going to try and convince posters their ‘favourite player’ isn’t all that. We’ll just let it run it’s course, and hopefully they turn out right and me wrong.
I thought I’d stay out of this thread after tonight‘s game tbh. I’ve already said all I need to say on the matter, I’ve written it a million different ways and now it’s time for whatever will be to be.
My belief has always been that he has been riding on a wave of personal fondness on here. When that wears off, and other talented new kids start emerging behind him that take their emotion, all that will be left is the player. And there’s not much there, in my opinion. In the match day thread I read a lot of people asking what’s gotten into him’ and ‘where’s the old McTominay?’. This is how he’s always played in my eyes. He wasn’t passing the ball well last October either, it’s just that people didn’t care because they were so smitten with their future captain. It was just ‘passing a little sloppy today but what a warrior’. Well he was still a warrior tonight and his passing was still sloppy. It was always just going to stop being okay all of a sudden once certain novelties wore off.
Anyway, this is my own take on things, and I’m not going to try and convince posters their ‘favourite player’ isn’t all that. We’ll just let it run it’s course, and hopefully they turn out right and me wrong.
He has dropped a lot since the reestart. He looks better against top opposition when we dont control the game, there he shows temperament and hunger but when we are the top team he looks out of place, cant make a pass.
Pretty much been my thoughts since the start of his career. I rarely post in his threads for the same reason. I've just been thinking, whatever McTominay is in their head, Ben Pearson is actually more fitting of that image. And James Garner is the next evolution of Ben Pearson, which is whatever image they have for Scott. Because making the step up is so hard and unpredictable (Ex: I thought Thorpe was better than Keane), I didn't want to claim Garner will eventually make Scott obsolete, but I've been waiting sitting on this thought.I thought I’d stay out of this thread after tonight‘s game tbh. I’ve already said all I need to say on the matter, I’ve written it a million different ways and now it’s time for whatever will be to be.
My belief has always been that he has been riding on a wave of personal fondness on here. When that wears off, and other talented new kids start emerging behind him that take their emotion, all that will be left is the player. And there’s not much there, in my opinion. In the match day thread I read a lot of people asking what’s gotten into him’ and ‘where’s the old McTominay?’. This is how he’s always played in my eyes. He wasn’t passing the ball well last October either, it’s just that people didn’t care because they were so smitten with their future captain. It was just ‘passing a little sloppy today but what a warrior’. Well he was still a warrior tonight and his passing was still sloppy. It was always just going to stop being okay all of a sudden once certain novelties wore off.
Anyway, this is my own take on things, and I’m not going to try and convince posters their ‘favourite player’ isn’t all that. We’ll just let it run it’s course, and hopefully they turn out right and me wrong.
I've never been a fan of his, so I won't pile on today when he was pretty poor.
I just think our midfielders for the most part should be of the quality that they help us control the game.
I don't want the type of midfielders that are best when they negate the opposition midfield from controlling the game. That's McTominay's game. I'd rather we move away from that.
I am pretty sure @Rozay or @Raees share the same opinion.
Pretty much been my thoughts since the start of his career. I rarely post in his threads for the same reason. I've just been thinking, whatever McTominay is in their head, Ben Pearson is actually more fitting of that image. And James Garner is the next evolution of Ben Pearson, which is whatever image they have for Scott. Because making the step up is so hard and unpredictable (Ex: I thought Thorpe was better than Keane), I didn't want to claim Garner will eventually make Scott obsolete, but I've been waiting sitting on this thought.
I thought I’d stay out of this thread after tonight‘s game tbh. I’ve already said all I need to say on the matter, I’ve written it a million different ways and now it’s time for whatever will be to be.
My belief has always been that he has been riding on a wave of personal fondness on here. When that wears off, and other talented new kids start emerging behind him that take their emotion, all that will be left is the player. And there’s not much there, in my opinion. In the match day thread I read a lot of people asking what’s gotten into him’ and ‘where’s the old McTominay?’. This is how he’s always played in my eyes. He wasn’t passing the ball well last October either, it’s just that people didn’t care because they were so smitten with their future captain. It was just ‘passing a little sloppy today but what a warrior’. Well he was still a warrior tonight and his passing was still sloppy. It was always just going to stop being okay all of a sudden once certain novelties wore off.
Anyway, this is my own take on things, and I’m not going to try and convince posters their ‘favourite player’ isn’t all that. We’ll just let it run it’s course, and hopefully they turn out right and me wrong.
You know Fred started this game right.. that said he looks like he has stagnated, before the lockdown he was really promising and was playing like a man on a mission.Ole’s bias towards him is frustrating. Fred is much better.
There's some real dishonesty to suggest tonight's performance was the same as those he was being praised for earlier in the season.I thought I’d stay out of this thread after tonight‘s game tbh. I’ve already said all I need to say on the matter, I’ve written it a million different ways and now it’s time for whatever will be to be.
My belief has always been that he has been riding on a wave of personal fondness on here. When that wears off, and other talented new kids start emerging behind him that take their emotion, all that will be left is the player. And there’s not much there, in my opinion. In the match day thread I read a lot of people asking what’s gotten into him’ and ‘where’s the old McTominay?’. This is how he’s always played in my eyes. He wasn’t passing the ball well last October either, it’s just that people didn’t care because they were so smitten with their future captain. It was just ‘passing a little sloppy today but what a warrior’. Well he was still a warrior tonight and his passing was still sloppy. It was always just going to stop being okay all of a sudden once certain novelties wore off.
Anyway, this is my own take on things, and I’m not going to try and convince posters their ‘favourite player’ isn’t all that. We’ll just let it run it’s course, and hopefully they turn out right and me wrong.
There's some real dishonesty to suggest tonight's performance was the same as those he was being praised for earlier in the season.
Maybe he was playing above himself earlier in the season, but to suggest he was actually playing poorly and everyone who thought he was playing well was deluded is clearly wrong.
So I take it you don't believe in a thing called form or variance? You seem to be of the opinion that since a player's technical abiltiy never varies, then their performances can't vary either. They can't for example, keep the ball well in a good game and lose the ball more often in a bad game.It isn’t clearly wrong. It’s wrong to you. It’s right to me, hence why I was saying the same things about his performances last year as people are saying tonight. In fact, a lot of what people are saying tonight was also said earlier on. Just glossed over.
Did Scott McTominay become a poor passer of the ball in the last few weeks? Or was he giving it away regularly right from the first game of the season against Chelsea, and then again at Wolves the next game and so on and so forth? It’s the perspective you choose to look at it from. He was some sort of great hope going into the season. Many were quick to rubbish off Matic and they had found a new player. Of course, in the midst of that, the things people are pulling him up for tonight were explained away, overlooked, mitigated - with a deliberate choice to focus on the things they liked, like his character, leadership, strength. His fans were NOT calling him a good passer of the ball even back then. They just cared a lot less in October that he can’t pass than they seem to care now.
Also, it hasn’t helped that we have had an opportunity to see better. While Pogba was injured, Bruno was in Spain, Matic was out of the team - people had put McTominay’s best as the standard, until it has been clearly shown in recent months that it is not the standard, which now makes the contrast obvious. If he was still the best we had (although I personally think Fred was better this season anyway), and started every game, I struggle to imagine the majority would be criticising his performances of recent months in the same way. When he plays the odd game in rotation for Matic/Pogba - there is no hiding from the clear drop in ability.
The fact is, some people were saying the things that are being said tonight many months ago. Others didn’t want to hear it. Unless you think that Scott was, in fact, so much better with the ball a few months back and was a player who we could leave in possession to probe and break teams down. This is who he was.
It's really not. McTominay's never been an amazing player, he was good earlier on in the season but he was given time to play himself into form due to injuries, he doesn't have that luxury anymore because our better midfielders are back from injury. It's not surprising to see fringe players look sluggish, they're lacking match sharpness.It is a worry under Ole that our players decline after a bright start under them when they play. Not sure what they are doing wrong with coaching players.
So I take it you don't believe in a thing called form or variance? You seem to be of the opinion that since a player's technical abiltiy never varies, then their performances can't vary either. They can't for example, keep the ball well in a good game and lose the ball more often in a bad game.
Whilst it's true that a player's performance will be looked at more favourably by the fans when they're on a positive wave of momentum, it's also true that if they're out of favour with the fans then their performances will be judged a lot more harshly than they would be otherwise.
Some of the loose balls and errors from Matic in the last few games would have had him crucified earlier in the season when everyone was on his back, but they pretty much got overlooked on here because he was in a spell where the fans were riding his dick. Matic has experienced both ends of the spectrum this season and the truth is he wasn't as bad as made out early in the season and wasn't as good as made out in the 2nd half of the season.
Many fans make their minds up about players and refuse to judge their performances on the merits of what they actually do on the pitch. If you don't think he's good enough to be starting in midfield for us, fine, perfectly valid opinion. The idea that he's never played well though is just absurd.
Basically agree with this sentiment although i wouldnt have put it as harshly. People wanted to look for positives when there wasnt any. A guy running around, trying his heart out, defending with pride was all there was. So people thought that actually made him a skillful player. Id still keep scott as a 2nd choice backup as he's from the Academy and got him on fairly low wages and signed a long term contract just this yearHis “good form” earlier in the season wasn’t much good either. There is a reason his “good form” had us sitting in 14th place a quarter way through the season and 8th halfway through. We were nothing but a mid table side playing dog shit football and regularly getting outplayed in midfield. So desperate for positives that people clutched on to him trying hard as if that makes him a good footballer, completing ignoring the fact we were sitting in 14th place because we were outplayed in midfield every match.
His passing stats are similar to those games you believe he was good in. Mctominays limitations are showing very well now because we are a team that now demands the ball. Most games he gets praised for we are usually the counter attacking side which requires less of the ball and more reactionary football. Now that he actually has to be more inventive he is struggling. There is no reason why he should have a 72% passing rate against such weak opposition. His partner fred had 89%.There's some real dishonesty to suggest tonight's performance was the same as those he was being praised for earlier in the season.
Maybe he was playing above himself earlier in the season, but to suggest he was actually playing poorly and everyone who thought he was playing well was deluded is clearly wrong.
Its not really that he cant pass but that his touches/movement with the ball dont give him the opportunity to do so. Its like sometimes he cant turn quick enough and also release a pass under pressure. Carrick knew how to manipulate his body frame in order to pass in all directions because he had a great first touch. Mctominay can move quickly with the ball but doesnt have the consistent touch to follow through as he moves. You would usually see him either kick the ball to far or like today in the 9th minute miscontrol the ball. Its somewhat a technical issue.He can't really pass the ball. That's not something that he's suddenly going to learn how to do.
He's big and strong and gets up and down the pitch really well, so there is a role for him off the bench in closing out games, but he's not a starter at a club that wants to challenge for titles.
My belief has always been that he has been riding on a wave of personal fondness on here. When that wears off, and other talented new kids start emerging behind him that take their emotion, all that will be left is the player. And there’s not much there, in my opinion. In the match day thread I read a lot of people asking what’s gotten into him’ and ‘where’s the old McTominay?’. This is how he’s always played in my eyes. He wasn’t passing the ball well last October either, it’s just that people didn’t care because they were so smitten with their future captain. It was just ‘passing a little sloppy today but what a warrior’. Well he was still a warrior tonight and his passing was still sloppy. It was always just going to stop being okay all of a sudden once certain novelties wore off.
I don't care what anyone says, I think McTominay played very well during the early parts of the season, often one of the few bright lights in an otherwise dismal autumn/winter. That being said, he just hasn't been at the races since the restart. He's still young, so he deserves patience, but his form has been worrying.
You’re likely correct. I think he can be a valuable squad player for us, but not good enough to start.He played well during counter attacking set-ups. When we faced teams that sat back, he was poor. I'd rather have a midfielder that can play well in both set-ups.
He has the worst passing accuracy of our midfielders by far and he doesn't exactly attempt many penetrating passes. It's a concern.
That's definitely his issue which isn't ideal for a central midfielder. He's one who needs to impress next season. Clearly useful when it comes to imposing oneself through sheer physicality and effort on opponents, but for one of the main 4/5 CMs at United let's see if he can display the necessary all round quality especially passing.Can't pass.
He was very good. But I think we've up a level as a team and he has to move with it. For example, he needs to show that he's not merely that physically strong CM who especially in big games gives us a bit of an edge and drive, but a quality midfielder in general. As has been said by others next season I'd like to see him improve his passing.I don't care what anyone says, I think McTominay played very well during the early parts of the season, often one of the few bright lights in an otherwise dismal autumn/winter. That being said, he just hasn't been at the races since the restart. He's still young, so he deserves patience, but his form has been worrying.
As usual with us we rush out give a new contract to players after a few months of good form and hype, it’s laughable. Then we wonder why we’re stuck with our deadwood for so long as no one can afford to take it off our hands.Been awful since lockdown , done nothing to deserve the new contract
Great Post.So I take it you don't believe in a thing called form or variance? You seem to be of the opinion that since a player's technical abiltiy never varies, then their performances can't vary either. They can't for example, keep the ball well in a good game and lose the ball more often in a bad game.
Whilst it's true that a player's performance will be looked at more favourably by the fans when they're on a positive wave of momentum, it's also true that if they're out of favour with the fans then their performances will be judged a lot more harshly than they would be otherwise.
Some of the loose balls and errors from Matic in the last few games would have had him crucified earlier in the season when everyone was on his back, but they pretty much got overlooked on here because he was in a spell where the fans were riding his dick. Matic has experienced both ends of the spectrum this season and the truth is he wasn't as bad as made out early in the season and wasn't as good as made out in the 2nd half of the season.
Many fans make their minds up about players and refuse to judge their performances on the merits of what they actually do on the pitch. If you don't think he's good enough to be starting in midfield for us, fine, perfectly valid opinion. The idea that he's never played well though is just absurd.
He hasn't even put in much effort since the restart, casually strolling around in the middle of the pitch even. No idea what happened to him.That's definitely his issue which isn't ideal for a central midfielder. He's one who needs to impress next season. Clearly useful when it comes to imposing oneself through sheer physicality and effort on opponents, but for one of the main 4/5 CMs at United let's see if he can display the necessary all round quality especially passing.