So I had a look at all his seasons..
McTominay against the best clubs record,
Domestic Competitions | W | D | L |
Chelsea (5) | 4 | 1 | 0 |
MCity (3) | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Spurs (3) | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Liverpool (3) | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Arsenal (2) | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Leicester (3) | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Wolves (3) | 0 | 1 | 2 |
TOTAL (22) | 13 | 6 | 3 |
The one lost vs Arsenal -- he only played 6 mins in 16/17.
Exclude Wolves and my gahd, this is an impressive record.
Domestic Competitions | W | D | L |
Chelsea (5) | 4 | 1 | 0 |
MCity (3) | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Spurs (3) | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Liverpool (3) | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Arsenal (2) | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Leicester (3) | 3 | 0 | 0 |
TOTAL (19) | 13 | 5 | 1 |
^ if we filter this even more removing the games where he play low number of minutes eg. let's say less than 20 mins.
16/17 -- Arsenal (6mins)
17/18 -- City (5mins)
18/19 -- Leicester (14mins), Chelsea (9mins, 1min), Spurs (1min)
19/20 -- City (12mins but he scored a goal here to make it 2-0), Leicester (4mins)
Domestic Competitions | W | D | L |
Chelsea (3) | 3 | 0 | 0 |
MCity (1) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Spurs (2) | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Liverpool (3) | 1 | 2 | 0 |
Arsenal (1) | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Leicester (1) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
TOTAL (11) | 7 | 4 | 0 |
Still impressive.
Conclusion?
Ole has to pick him more in the big games (excluding Wolves = higher mid-table team) but the team is fine now with Bruno vs any team.
Statistically, playing both Bruno and also McT would help improved more the odds of us winning or at least draw.
As for european games.. these is interesting.
European Competitions | W | D | L |
Champions League (7) | 4 | 1 | 2 |
Europa League (5) | 4 | 1 | 0 |
TOTAL (12) | 8 | 2 | 2 |
1 Win vs PSG. The two Loss vs Barca, though many argued he is our best player in both games.