Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

Its looking like another hugely significant hit. Judging by the amount of misslies cooking off in the clip, it seems clear all that MRLS shown above was still there, potentially more as a railway bridge further north was damaged last week which could of forced further pile up of storage here.

But also:
 
I think overall this is a better solution then a full ban on Russians entering the country. Russians who have a valid reason to visit will still be able to but it stops Finland being used as a transit country for rich Russians going on holliday in southern Europe, which have been the case this summer.

https://yle.fi/news/3-12578158

Minister for Foreign Affairs Pekka Haavisto (Green) said that Finland will limit the number of Russian visa applications that it accepts to around 10 percent of the current level.
Haavisto said the changes will take effect at the beginning of September. The government met at the House of Estates in Helsinki on Tuesday to discuss visas for Russians. No firm decisions had been expected from the informal meeting.
Finland now accepts about 1,000 visa applications from Russians every day, but plans to only accept about 100 daily as of next month.
The Ministry for Foreign Affairs has prepared a model under which priority would be given to those applying for visas due to family reasons, work or study.
Click to expand...
 
the hea said:
I think overall this is a better solution then a full ban on Russians entering the country. Russians who have a valid reason to visit will still be able to but it stops Finland being used as a transit country for rich Russians going on holliday in southern Europe, which have been the case this summer.

https://yle.fi/news/3-12578158
Click to expand...
Correct me if I am wrong but nobody ever discussed or implemented a "full ban" on Russians. The countries like Estonia did essentially the same as Finland, which is stopping issuing tourist visas but you can still get it for work or if you have family members.
 
I wouldn't mind a few caftards leaving a few comments on this tweet.

 
So have there been two or three big sabotage attacks in Crimea today? Seemed like there were already 2 when I woke up this morning, and then the guardian reported a third at about midday, but I don’t know whether that was simply late or updated reporting of one of the earlier ones. Either way they look pretty effective. The one that seemed to be at an ammo or fuel storage facility was firing off in all directions, it must have caused some serious destruction. Less sure about the apparent electrical substation, i can only assume it was near a military target, or was itself militarily important. Either way, these seem significant events. Russia is resupplying it’s Kherson defensive through Crimea and the Kerch bridge (next target), the Ukraine seems to be doing a good job of isolating those armies still West of the Dneiper. Next few weeks will be very interesting.
 
Gehrman said:
I wouldn't mind a few caftards leaving a few comments on this tweet.

Click to expand...

Well, views of some company don't reflect the views of the country but it's a bit ironic it came from French. I would guess Germans would produce similar content.
 
dove said:
Correct me if I am wrong but nobody ever discussed or implemented a "full ban" on Russians. The countries like Estonia did essentially the same as Finland, which is stopping issuing tourist visas but you can still get it for work or if you have family members.
Click to expand...
I haven't been following this discussion closely so you'r probably right. I just took for granted it was a full ban because of the Russians strong reactions.
 
the hea said:
I haven't been following this discussion closely so you'r probably right. I just took for granted it was a full ban because of the Russians strong reactions.
Click to expand...
Yea, media are always trying to sell clicks with their headlines. But as far as I am aware, full ban was never on the cards or suggested by any politician.
 
Raoul said:
She's probably on the Russian payroll.
Click to expand...

Having looked at a few of her tweets just now, I was going to suggest she’s just a nutter but maybe you’re right.

I saw another charming piece of Russian disinformation on Facebook this week - an illustrated information sheet supposedly photographed by a concerned mother at a UK primary school (meaning young children) which was teaching the children to be nice to paedos (in so many words).
 
Krakenzero said:
Somebody asked for a summary, I'll do my best:

February: Putin's plan A to take Kyiv failed, as they didn't get to control the air bases.

March: Putin's plan B to take Kyiv was stalled indefinitely by Ukraine's resistance attacking their supply line. They weren't even able to occupy the border city of Kharkiv. They got better luck securing the southeast from Kherson to (not including) Mariupol.

April: Putin's plan B to take Kyiv failed, as their forces moved back to Russia to regroup. They somehow managed to also lose their biggest ship in the southeast front despite Ukraine not having a navy. Kharkiv and Mariupol still haven't fallen.

May: Mariupol finally fell. Though, Russia's plans to take Kharkiv were abandoned. The goalposts were moved to securing the Donbas.

June: After a whole month, Russian forces were able to take Severodonetsk. The rest of the fronts remain mainly stalled.

July: After occupying Lisichansk (the first big city west of the Donbas) the first week of the month, the eastern front got stalled. Ukraine starts a counter offensive in Kherson.

August: Ukraine's offensive in Kherson slowly advances. The port of Odessa exports grain for the first time since the beggining of the invasion. The russian occupation of Crimea is hit by Ukranian resistance for the first time as well. There's almost 40 days since the last significant russian gain.

Looking at the big picture, almost everyone (me included) overestimated the RA's power and underestimated Ukraine's resistance and the West's ressolve to intervene in the conflict.
Click to expand...

Thanks for that
 
NicolaSacco said:
It’s going to get hit, isn’t it.
Click to expand...

If the objective is to both hit the separatists' psyche and create a logistical nightmare for the Russian army at the same time, the bridge definitely is the juiciest target to do so (for as long as civilians aren't on it).
 
Last edited:
Well its not getting hit with a civlian traffic jam on there, so I hope anyone travelling brought plenty food and water.
 
I missed this but apparently there were explosions at another airfield in Crimea yesterday, just no footage of it. Waiting for today's satelite images.
 
Do we know what's the current population makeup in crimea? If ukraine decides to retake it, will they be welcomed by the population or has russia managed to change it in the last few years to a point where people will see ukranians as invaders?
 
maniak said:
Do we know what's the current population makeup in crimea? If ukraine decides to retake it, will they be welcomed by the population or has russia managed to change it in the last few years to a point where people will see ukranians as invaders?
Click to expand...
Russia made a lot of effort to bring Russians there, the question is if they would stay in case of a Ukrainian invasion on Crimea
 
maniak said:
Do we know what's the current population makeup in crimea? If ukraine decides to retake it, will they be welcomed by the population or has russia managed to change it in the last few years to a point where people will see ukranians as invaders?
Click to expand...

It's a very legit question I don't know the answer. I'm not sure anyone could answer that but for someone living there.
 
Enjoying this guys' daily updates. He's only been out there a couple weeks, to clear mines from farmland. There appears to be absolutely fecktons of mines.
 
Hypothetically, if there was to be a 3rd country to broker peace between Russia and Ukraine, who would be the likely candidates? Can't think of a single country who both parties might think as a good neutral candidate while also being a powerful country capable of dealing with such negotiations. Would probably have to be at least 2 broker countries on the table to balance off the bias each might have towards one of the nation's.

Sorry if it's really off topic for the thread, but seemed like an interesting idea to me.
 
GodShaveTheQueen said:
Hypothetically, if there was to be a 3rd country to broker peace between Russia and Ukraine, who would be the likely candidates? Can't think of a single country who both parties might think as a good neutral candidate while also being a powerful country capable of dealing with such negotiations. Would probably have to be at least 2 broker countries on the table to balance off the bias each might have towards one of the nation's.

Sorry if it's really off topic for the thread, but seemed like an interesting idea to me.
Click to expand...
Israel or Turkey
 
GodShaveTheQueen said:
Hypothetically, if there was to be a 3rd country to broker peace between Russia and Ukraine, who would be the likely candidates? Can't think of a single country who both parties might think as a good neutral candidate while also being a powerful country capable of dealing with such negotiations. Would probably have to be at least 2 broker countries on the table to balance off the bias each might have towards one of the nation's.

Sorry if it's really off topic for the thread, but seemed like an interesting idea to me.
Click to expand...

Turkey has been involved in quite a bit of mediation between Moscow and Kiev.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.