calodo2003
Flaming Full Member
It’s bad when I saw this thread pop up & wanted to enter it to forget our match.
The guy he did that to was actually his uncle.
We don't have to. The longer this goes on, the more Russia is likely to lose. There is no need to get into escalation games with Putin. The aim should be to deny him tactical options, and contain him, not engage and open space up for him.So far Russia keeps drawing red lines in this conflict, that will escalate the conflict with NATO. NATO keeps backing off, backing off and Putin is emboldened to redraw the red line further and further.
NATO needs somebody, who is not afraid to be proactive, and draw their own lines, make their rules that Russia should fear overstepping. Western Ukraine (maybe Lviv region) should be no fly zone to allow civilians a safe passage. Idk what they can impose, but any tampering with nuclear power plants should be met with a strong response instead of expressions of concern.
Yes.It was rumuored that Kim had one general executed by strapping him to an anti-aircraft gun and firing it, I think he referred to that.
It was rumuored that Kim had one general executed by strapping him to an anti-aircraft gun and firing it, I think he referred to that.
We don't have to. The longer this goes on, the more Russia is likely to lose. There is no need to get into escalation games with Putin. The aim should be to deny him tactical options, and contain him, not engage and open space up for him.
We don't have to. The longer this goes on, the more Russia is likely to lose. There is no need to get into escalation games with Putin. The aim should be to deny him tactical options, and contain him, not engage and open space up for him.
It will be messy, but a prolonged conflict will potentially ensure a loss for Russia. Keep targeting their softer targets like fuel & supply trucks & the war will be won through attrition.We don't have to. The longer this goes on, the more Russia is likely to lose. There is no need to get into escalation games with Putin. The aim should be to deny him tactical options, and contain him, not engage and open space up for him.
Interesting given it's only about €260.
Any chance that the judiciary will refuse to support Putin?
Is that officially what happened or just a suspicion?A couple of russian twitter accounts I follow think that the fine is for the video message. She will be looking at 5-10 years for storming the news broadcast afaik.
And if you think the judiciary will refuse to support Putin, check out Navalny's court hearing from today. The judge took 3-4 breaks to call the president administration during the process.
Constructivism wins again
Is that officially what happened or just a suspicion?
Although I'm sure the judge presiding over a high profile case like Navalny answers directly to Putin, I could still imagine that in less important cases involving protestors there might be more room to judge leniently.. even if it's unlikely.
Did you know Alexander Wendt is super into aliens?
Depends. My parent's house was semi-destroyed during the Lebanese Civil War (75-90), no one helped rebuild shit.
These are like the loitering munitions Russia has been using. Basically small drones with warheads attached. At present, I don't think they can be exported except to the UK.
Russia claimed to be in control of Kherson 2 weeks ago. I guess they might have to reconsider.
How fecking stupid must you be of an army to have 4 generals being KIA within a month?
I didn't say that being isolationist is in their best interest, I said that there are large sections of their society who believe it the most desirable option.
I think Putin realizes that he's in a race against time to demolish the country before any of these weapons have enough time to see the light of day in Ukraine. If he can put a wrecking ball to most Ukrainian cities, he will be able to pull back and claim some sort of fake victory against fascists for domestic consumption.
Listening to Michael Kofman talk, it's apparently more in Russian military doctrine/culture for commanders to lead from the front so it's not irregular for lots of them to die. It seems pretty stupid to me.
These images show they have access to the type of drone that landed in Croatia and would suggest that Russia is responsible for that.
If there were Patriot, THAAD, or US Iron Dome batteries along the border with Ukraine in NATO countries, perhaps we could shoot down anything that threatens to cross into NATO territory. Given the number of projectiles so far that have entered NATO airspace, they should threaten to shoot down any missiles or drones that threaten NATO. Russia isn't flying bombing runs over Western Ukraine and are using air-launched ballistic missiles from standoff range to attack Lviv and other areas. Who can really tell where a missile aimed for Lviv or 15 km from the border are going to land so it's best to shoot them down just to be safe. Missile defense for Western Ukraine.
I'm sure this isn't practical though given the risks involved.
I know this is something that has been happening for humanity’s entire written history and more but… I still fail to comprehend how someone can be personally killing 7-10 people a day during a war and then at the end of it simply letting it slide off him and integrating back into society. I just can’t.
I think if I killed 1 person I’d have PTSD. Killing 10 sounds crazy, it’d be life altering. I can’t even imagine killing 10 a day and then being able to sleep again.
PS. It’s easier for a leader to give a command and feel disconnected from the result if he’s not doing it himself or observing the result with his eyes. Gunning someone down yourself feels very personal.