Not to provide an excuse for them but from what I've read the company that supplies Russia is only 23% owned by Coca-Cola. What I read being suggested is that Coca Cola can still stop the delivery of syrup which is the main ingredient.Coca Cola refusing to join in with the rest of the world is sad. Hopefully they come to their senses if the backlash of that decision is huge. Another reason to get Cristiano to proclaim drink water instead.
It's absolutely frightening on so many fronts.Canceling an entire country. Scary to think about.
I do worry that this will only just make Russia that much more reliant on China.
Coca Cola refusing to join in with the rest of the world is sad. Hopefully they come to their senses if the backlash of that decision is huge. Another reason to get Cristiano to proclaim drink water instead.
The Russian oligarchs that had their properties seized by governments around Europe and at least a good portion of their stocks decimated can't happy with how this has turned out.I can only see two outcomes....Putin escalates a european or world war....or Russia fails and he gets murdered.
Fixed that post for you. Garbage company that promotes bad habitsCoca Cola is sad.
I can only see two outcomes....Putin escalates a european or world war....or Russia fails and he gets murdered.
Well they invented Fanta for the Nazis, so no shock here.
This is no excuse, targeting of civilians is also a war crime. So to say "well we didn't know who they were so we just opened fire" is not an excuse, its a confession.They probably have no idea they're press considering they're shouting in English to Russians, but they clearly aren't army. Modern body armour is amazing.
Wow, is that true?
Saw that a poll in Sweden showed 51% of the population supporting joining NATO now.
Add to the list.This is no excuse, targeting of civilians is also a war crime. So to say "well we didn't know who they were so we just opened fire" is not an excuse, its a confession.
Quite.Add to the list.
#NoFlyZone trending on Twitter as both the BBC and CNN mindlessly and unsubtly push for it.
Fecking idiots.
Assuming that Putin is not somehow removed from office by internal powers in Russia, and regardless of how the situation in Ukraine turns out (whether further partition, or ongoing insurgent resistance against a Russian "victory"), direct military conflict between NATO and Russia now looks inevitable in the medium term .
This is because Russia has set out red-lines that NATO and the EU simply can't live with ... red lines which say that Russia has the right to exercise a veto on whether additional sovereign nations can join NATO and/or the EU.
Sooner or later, and probably sooner, Finland or Sweden or some other European country is going apply to be accepted into NATO membership. Before the application is accepted, Putin will then be obliged to take action to avoid his threat being exposed as a bluff.
At this point, I believe NATO will respond by sending military units into the country concerned, regardless of whether the NATO membership application has still to be formally accepted.
Then things will become really dangerous in terms of a real WWIII potentially breaking out.
Has Nestle said anything?
Guys, this might be our chance to cancel Nestle!
Trending where?
I view world wide trends and the war / Ukraine hardly gets mentioned in top trends aside from the first 2 days.
The short term (today to next 6 months) pressures like economic/financial pressures on Russia will be enormous. Then the bodybags will start to take its psychological toll after that.
So whats medium term in your scenario? Will Putin last till that 'medium term'?
Based on the recent polling that has come out about 74% of Americans in favor of no-fly zone, I feel that Western leaders may be forced to reconsider if Russia uses biological/chemical/thermobaric weapons or level cities to the ground indiscriminately. I think Russia suspect this so that's why they haven't gone full Aleppo yet.
Based on the recent polling that has come out about 74% of Americans in favor of no-fly zone, I feel that Western leaders may be forced to reconsider if Russia uses biological/chemical/thermobaric weapons or level cities to the ground indiscriminately. I think Russia suspect this so that's why they haven't gone full Aleppo yet.
Medium term is maybe 6 months to 3 years from now. Unless he dies from natural causes, my guess is that Putin will still be in power during this period.
Well they invented Fanta for the Nazis, so no shock here.
I don't know how he remains in power say 2 yrs from now with the economic pressures building up.
He is trying to make it like some North Korean propaganda hermit kingdom when the cat's already out of the bag and they have had all the exposure to western lifestyles.
The only option is slowly and begrudgingly, cap in hand and ask China for some major financial support. And that's a tough one since Russians see themselves as superior or at worst equal to the Chinese.
He has basically checkmated himself.
I hope you are right. But he has been in power for a long, long time now - long enough to ensure that he is totally surrounded by loyalists, with everyone else under his thumb. Moreover, his career background is KGB/FSB, so he knows all about security, threats to that security and how to nullify those threats, whether through assassination, blackmail or financial inducements.
NATO are taking a reactive approach to all of this, hoping that supporting the Ukrainians with intel and weapons will stave off Russian advances long enough to where they run into logistics and morale issues, and at the same time, Russia implodes from within and in the process forces Putin into some sort of negotiation.
I do agree that the harder Putin goes after civilians, the harder it will be for NATO to not intervene in some way.
No Fly Zone?
No Fly Zone?
Based on the recent polling that has come out about 74% of Americans in favor of no-fly zone, I feel that Western leaders may be forced to reconsider if Russia uses biological/chemical/thermobaric weapons or level cities to the ground indiscriminately. I think Russia suspect this so that's why they haven't gone full Aleppo yet.
Those are two pretty unlikely extremes in fairness.
Unless you're being sarcastic. I'm not even sure in this thread anymore.
Do you believe?About the same believe in angels so I'm not sure that it is a good metric.