Mike Smalling
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2018
- Messages
- 13,583
There’s not much Belarus can do. What happens when they say no? They are in the catch 22.
True, but seems like they are willing participants.
There’s not much Belarus can do. What happens when they say no? They are in the catch 22.
So, Germany is sending help in the form of helmets but the exchange cannot take place in Ukraine. I'm seriously struggling to understand the difference here, either way, Russia knows Germany supplied Ukranians with aid (much like other countries have been doing) Yet Russia continues with this "If you interfere you will face consequences" rhetoric. I think its safe to say the West has interfered. It may be time to call their bluff entirely, and impose the toughest sanctions possible immediately.
That’s where UA is dug in. They shelled it almost non stop yesterday if you look at the vids from last night. Lots of reports of huge Russian casualties.That looks like a gas pipeline or something similar to me.
Regarding the F1 aspect, one of the teams (Haas) is owned by Dmitry Mazepin (who is the owner of Uralkali)I know it’s almost meme level joking about this being enough to end the war but these sorts of things are going to add up to the Russian public over time. No Eurovision, no Grand Prix, no Champions League, the list is going to go on and on and over time the public is going to begin to massively resent being cut off from the rest of the world.
That’s where UA is dug in. They shelled it almost non stop yesterday if you look at the vids from last night. Lots of reports of huge Russian casualties.
More concerning is the Russian ship off of Ireland that was loitering around the transatlantic internet cables.
Putin & his goons have enough money to withstand any external economical pressure and he doesn't care about Russian people enough for them to really influence his decisions. It's very egoistical of me, of course, but I just know that he's going to be just as good as he was before and we're going to struggle while Russian stance on the matter of Ukraine won't change even a bit.
The only possible scenario where those sanctions would actually lead to anything is if the whole entirety of Russian population riots and overthrows the current regime but somehow I doubt that it's possible
It's a debate in nuclear strategy. If you interpret that a tactical nuclear strike would lead to broader nuclear strikes as retaliation, and so on and so forth, leading to a situation where maybe your nuclear force would be at risk from a first-strike, then the conclusion is never to make a limited nuclear strike. "If one goes, they all go" is the saying. I have no idea what the actual thinking is nowadays in the actual governments.It would be tactical nuclear weapons aimed at destroying a large military build up. Bombing cities like Hiroshima would be the very last option.
If I were Finland I think I would join now before its too late
Regarding the F1 aspect, one of the teams (Haas) is owned by Dmitry Mazepin (who is the owner of Uralkali)
After what I know about the people of Finland, that message will only make them more defiant and edge them closer to joining Nato. Russia is going to break down again I think. The consequences will be extreme no matter how their illegal invasion goes.
A country can't just join when/because it suits them. Members contribute, train together and stand ready to defend each other.
There are a lot of transatlantic cables from France, Spain, Portugal, England... They can't just "bring down" the internet.
Disclaimer: It's a stupid thought.It's a debate in nuclear strategy. If you interpret that a tactical nuclear strike would lead to broader nuclear strikes as retaliation, and so on and so forth, leading to a situation where maybe your nuclear force would be at risk from a first-strike, then the conclusion is never to make a limited nuclear strike. "If one goes, they all go" is the saying. I have no idea what the actual thinking is nowadays in the actual governments.
As another practical point though, I think the US is currently a bit better positioned in the strategic nuclear balance and that could lead to instability. Basically the US is pretty well protected against a counter-force strike, because even if their ICBM and bomber bases are successfully targeted, they should have enough SLBMs that are pretty safe to launch a devastating strike. But further, the US might possibly think (again, dunno what the actual thinking is) that a first-strike on their part against Russian ICBMs and bomber bases could be successful in significantly reducing their numbers, and make a defense against a smaller Russian strike viable with their limited anti-ballistic missile defenses. The summary is that if indeed US planners believe this is possible, they have motivation to launch a first-strike if they believe Russia is seriously contemplating a strike of their own. So yeah, I think we're maybe a bit less stable than back in 1983
You’re right, Russians have caused a huge fire after targeting some kind of industrial complex. Air strikes and cruise missiles. Lots of vids on Twitter.That is something on fire, not explosions by the looks. Only times I've seen fires like that are either chemical facilities e.g. Buncefield fire or pipelines.
If I were Finland I think I would join now before its too late
There’s not much Belarus can do. What happens when they say no? They are in the catch 22.
Putin & his goons have enough money to withstand any external economical pressure and he doesn't care about Russian people enough for them to really influence his decisions. It's very egoistical of me, of course, but I just know that he's going to be just as good as he was before and we're going to struggle while Russian stance on the matter of Ukraine won't change even a bit.
The only possible scenario where those sanctions would actually lead to anything is if the whole entirety of Russian population riots and overthrows the current regime but somehow I doubt that it's possible
A country can't just join when/because it suits them. Members contribute, train together and stand ready to defend each other.
I'm not saying they shouldn't, but it's unfair on all the other members.
Tsar bomba was just for testing and boasting, its was an impractical design for any realistic delivery platforms. I think that in the same vein Putin was boasting about some HSVDisclaimer: It's a stupid thought.
This made me wonder, do we know if Russia has an equivalent of the Tsar Bomba? Maybe the Putin Bomba?
Nah probably not. Big bombs are apparently impractical. The warheads the US currently has are mostly (all?) below 500 kilotons, Tsar bomba was ~50 mega. The preference is for a bigger number of smaller warheads, that you can multiple of on platforms (submarines, stealth bombers) that can successfully deliver them to the target. Not one giant bomb that will depend on one bomber successfully making it to its target.Disclaimer: It's a stupid thought.
This made me wonder, do we know if Russia has an equivalent of the Tsar Bomba? Maybe the Putin Bomba?
Tsar bomba was just for testing and boasting, its was an impractical design for any realistic delivery platforms. I think that in the same vein Putin was boasting about some HSV
I can imagine the look of fear on their Finnish faces. The sudden dread of war against Russia would definitely make their facial muscles move by about a millimetre.After what I know about the people of Finland, that message will only make them more defiant and edge them closer to joining Nato. Russia is going to break down again I think. The consequences will be extreme no matter how their illegal invasion goes.
I have so much respect for him. This guy walks the walk.
Reminds me of this videoTsar bomba was just for testing and boasting, its was an impractical design for any realistic delivery platforms. I think that in the same vein Putin was boasting about some HSV
Over the past few days I’ve been exposed to much more of those opinions, sadly. The main argument is “they’re crying war now but why were they ignoring 8-year long war at Donbass?”.@harms I know this is a very difficult question to answer given the circles you keep, but at your best estimate, how much of the country is likely to be okay with what Putin is doing? If it's anywhere near 50%, that's terrifying.
Maybe it’s an ammunition storage getting blown up?What the heck is that? That is a massive explosion
A lot of his own country men think hes a fool