- Joined
- Feb 12, 2018
- Messages
- 20,335
Putin doesn't want Russia to directly border Nato countries. He wants countries in between as a buffer but he wants them to be pro-Russian instead of pro-Nato. He's got that with Belarus and Georgia whilst Finland stays neutral. Ukraine was the only one actively pursuing membership. I think his goal in Ukraine is to install a more Russia-friendly government that will drop plans to join Nato then the troops will withdraw.
He can tolerate Estonia and Latvia because its a single front and it's too late, they're already in. If Ukraine joined, it would give Nato two fronts to attack from.
As one who posted two tweets from Russian officials, I would feel very, very unfairly treated if I was permabanned (or even threadbanned) for that. Delete the tweets if it's deemed necessary, sure, but come on. The sheer lunacy of the tweets deserved a place in this thread to be discussed and provide context, and is no different from providing the exact same quotes in a BBC article.
Actually, I think you fail to grasp the difference between posting propaganda, and sharing direct and relevant information for context in a thread about an ongoing war. Actually reading what the officials say about this war, may help understand what is actually going on. Posting these things is not the same as condoning or agreeing, and they're not from any dubious sources. This is (by extension) Putins own words. If we can't post that, we might as well close this thread entierly.
This is just a very bad take, imho.
What the actual feck
That's not what it's for but it is an organisation designed to counter Russia, and Putin does have a point that Nato has expanded Eastwards since its inception. This war is his version only he's using tanks instead of a membership agreement.
Really hope you are right about that for all our sakes. And I do believe you are.
No. Their quotes are propaganda and lies in itself they have no value, you understand that? What it does it may only give them an information stream to deceive those less capable of critical thinking or generally who don’t follow this closely and just read “quotes”. The whole point is to get rid of the fake news and by posting fake news you do the job for them. Their whole propaganda model is built on throwing a lot of different and often contradictory shit at the wall and hoping it sticks.Quoting Russian officials is not endorsing them.
Banning anybody who is providing direct quotes from Russian politicians is surely a mistake. It's not the same as propaganda if we're discussing it.
Unless you just want to ignore that these sentiments from Russians exist, in which case our conversation will be blind in one eye.
What the actual feck
I know that's the official reasoning, but personally I think this is all muscle flexing from someone who's losing it. No one could believe that NATO would ever, ever invade Russia. For me, it's all about pride and showing the world how big and strong Russia still is. I'm surprised he hasn't been pictured riding into battle topless on his horse yet.
Russia already shares a border with multiple NATO countries, though. Estonia and Latvia as you mention, but also Lithuania, Poland and Norway. Multiple fronts, that.
Apparently there's more context here but you can't see it in the clip. There's literally some dozens of meters away a firefight going on. Could have been distracted.
I don't know on which page I posted it, it's maybe 5 pages back. Longer clip.what context? they fecking rolled over people and crushed them in a shitty car
That's not what it's for but it is an organisation designed to counter Russia, and Putin does have a point that Nato has expanded Eastwards since its inception. This war is his version only he's using tanks instead of a membership agreement.
Possibly a reference to this…I hope this becomes a famous phrase.
Man the ignore list is going to get longer and longer today, see ya.
Most likely, yes. Ukraine will receive more aid, also military aid, but they have to do the fighting on their own.So, what exactly would need to happen from here on out in Ukraine for the West to act?
I get that NATO won't actively come in for a non-member state, but does the opposing world just now sit back and watch Putin do whatever the feck he likes in Ukraine. I know everything one sees on social media should be taken with a pinch of salt/can be used as a means in itself, but it does seem like they're doing whatever they want out there.
what context? they fecking rolled over people and crushed them in a shitty car
What the actual feck
You seem to be ignoring the fact that those countries welcomed NATO and why they did that.
You seem to be ignoring the fact that those countries welcomed NATO and why they did that.
Not much point invading Kaliningrad though is there, and good luck trying to invade anywhere via the Norwegian far North.
Not really, I reckon. If no ceasire/diplomatic solution is reached, then Ukraine will fall anyhow. But then what happens? If Ukrainians can organize a proper insurgency, this can take a long while.Wonder does it make any particular difference if their advance is slower than anticipated? I'm not sure what timeline they need to work to. It's not like there's obvious game-changing help coming if Ukraine hold on for long enough.
Not sure if posted yet, but this is sickening to read. Obligated entry into the army is madness imo.
So, what exactly would need to happen from here on out in Ukraine for the West to act?
Russian officials deserve no spotlight whatsoever from the moment their boss called a Jewish president of a sovereign country a provider of safe haven to Nazis when that president himself had a chunk of his family decimated by actual Nazis.
What on earth are you talking about. Best you keep me on ignore if you're that sensitive.
This is a very valid point. The best answers I have is that these things are not binary. There was no NATO that caused WW1 or 2. We are talking about a democratic country who peacefully disarmed their nuclear deterrent in exchange for guarantees of security from UK, US and Russia. I can’t say I am an expert, but do those guarantees not still stand? We are talking about a country who aspired - and even wrote into their constitution - to join NATO.
The only difference between the current situation and Hitler is that the latter didn’t have nukes. It’s unfortunate that we live in a world where mutually assured destruction is a possibility, but it is. The question is, is Putin really prepared to destroy the world (since I’m damn sure they would be the ones to make the first strike if it happened)? And would the Russian people and military let him? Until troops are marching on Moscow, I can’t see it happening. As long as NATO was clear about retaking Ukraine (and maybe Belarus while we are there), there is no reason to escalate.
My other idea was to enact a no-fly zone over Ukraine. Putin publicly claims that this is a special military operation, focused on the Donbas. With that in mind, a no-fly zone over the rest of Ukraine (ie Kyiv) should not interfere with his plans. Ukraine has the right to request their airspace be protected.
In practice, this would either mean Putin ceding that this is a full invasion, or sacrificing air operations - which would give the Ukrainians a much better fighting chance, if nothing else.
Alternately, tell Ukraine to sacrifice the Donbas and Crimea region in exchange for immediate NATO membership. If this conflict is about Donbas (which publicly, it is, according to Russia) then the conflict is over and you get Ukraine into NATO immediately. Again, is Putin going to start throwing nukes around for the sake of Western Ukraine? Not convinced.
Most likely, yes. Ukraine will receive more aid, also military aid, but they have to do the fighting on their own.