Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

I'm guessing not even the most committed of the #SlavaUkraini crowd can call this guy a Russian troll

Apparently an under-estimation.


To be clear, you're saying the exact words of the deputy head of Ukrainian military intelligence, as quoted by one of Britain's most pro-Ukrainian newspapers, are "Russian propaganda"? The exact words of the US Secretary of Defense, as delivered before the House Armed Services Committee are "Russian propaganda"? The words of Ukrainian president Zelenskiy are "Russian propaganda"? And finally, the words of Ukrainian soldiers, as quoted by US media, are "Russian propaganda"?


If 27 months of being wrong about the trajectory of this war is to teach you anything it will hopefully be that not everything that contradicts your assessment of the situation is "Russian propaganda", and not everyone talking common sense is a "paid Russian troll". There is a very basic reason why you’ve been wrong about this war: Russia’s leaders fundamentally mean what they say. Western leaders do not. Ukraine is the latest victim to belatedly discover this. You are listening to the wrong people. Yes, as someone pointed out a while back, I was demonstrably wrong in this thread about the time-line of this war (because I had no idea the West would be insane enough to actually think they could defeat Russia by pumping Ukraine full of weapons). But I have not been wrong about the trajectory.


As for engaging with you, I'll be blunt: you would be a waste of my time. I'll explain why. The first thing you did in your first response to me was to list your CV. And you know when people write "lol" on the internet and you know that at best they probably only smiled a bit? Well I legitimately laughed out loud reading it. And I say this to you with good intentions: the people you're impressing on here with that are the same people who have spent 2 years being impressed with the exact same kinds of blog posts from Phillips O'Brien and Ben Hodges and Hamish de Bretton-Gordon and Michael Clarke and all the other "NATO military experts" who have spent over 2 years promulgating nonsense about this war ("military expert" Phillips O'Brien was interviewed yet again by the BBC 2 weeks ago, talking about how the supplemental would put Ukraine back on the offensive. This is the same guy who said in March 2022 that the Russian army would collapse by May of 2022), but who nevertheless keep on getting posted in this thread as authorities.


That combined with your hubristic posts in the China thread and your statements about being very pro-West and being a part of Euromaidan - look, long story short, I get you, ok? I've had years and years of speaking to and reading folk like you. Your pictures of bicycle GPS glued to Russian jets, your facile grasp of history, your absolutely fundamental - this is common to almost all you ‘NATO military intelligence’ folk - lack of understanding of Russia; I get you. And you guys are exhausting to talk to because there is nothing on earth that can ever be said that will convince you that you're wrong. Look at your reaction just now - a terse and snarky dismissal of everything as "Russian propaganda", even though they are literally Western outlets quoting Western or Ukrainian officials.


So that's first. Second is this: your first reply to me was to deliver your CV as evidence for why you're qualified to speak on this subject (a major red flag, and very incidentally nothing you wrote in it tells me you're as remotely qualified as I am; its only merit was in helping me understand why you believe the things you do in the face of glaring evidence to the contrary). Your 2nd engagement was to call for me to be banned from this forum. Why? Because I had posted about the supplemental’s demand for a Ukraine strategy and I'd said the Biden Admin would not provide one. I have since been proven correct about that. But being right doesn't matter, does it? What matters is: you went straight to "ban this guy", simply for posting an opinion you did not like and that broke no rules of the forum.


For context - one page before my post, we had someone continuing to spam the place up with infamously garbage Ukrainian propaganda Twitter channels about how the Russian army is putting its soldiers on the tops of tanks as human shields (this genius actually had to have it explained to him why this was nonsense - it didn't occur to him naturally. Ironically this guy laughed at me a few months back for lamenting the state of Western media literacy). This was apparently fine with you. No calls to ban him for crapping up the thread with patent trash yet again. 2 weeks before that, we had another guy, the Quebec fellow, actively calling for Ukraine to mass murder Russian civilians in Crimea. To “get tough”, as he put it. Also seemingly fine with you. No calls for him to be banned.


But my posting an opinion you don’t like? Straight to “ban him”.


So you see what I mean. I get you. There are many, many like you and this war has brought them all to the surface again, as Iraq did and as Libya did (“oh but no, no, this one really IS black and white!!”). I’ve said many times in here for the last couple of years and I’ll probably say it many more times: I wish you “freedom and democracy” guys could hear yourselves sometimes. You are legitimately scary people. You are what you claim to hate. The guy who predicted fascism to one day return in the guise of liberalism had you in mind. Insults, ad hominem and calls for people to be banned for their opinions – these are the default settings of the self-appointed defenders and arbiters of a ‘civilised and liberal world order’.


The guy beneath you asked why I rarely post in any other thread. For many, many years I only lurked on this forum. I was born in Manchester, still have a house in Middleton, and United are my 2nd team. But this Ukraine war is deeply personal to me. I have family in both Russia and Ukraine, as many people involved in this conflict do. This war is not, as it very clearly is for certain people here in this thread, entertainment. I have watched with horror as the lunatics in Western governments have led Ukraine down this garden path, cheered on by weapons salesmen like Hodges and Clarke and their (literally) millions of #slavaukraini followers (I know, I know “But it was PUTIN who invaded!!!” Thanks for the 6-year-old’s grasp of the situation). Ukraine has been systematically destroyed by idiots invoking Neville Chamberlain and totally misstating why this war has happened. With proper Western leadership, it needn’t have gone this way. Ukraine needn’t have been destroyed, with its best-case scenario now being to retain some level of “sovereignty" (per Austin’s words in that video I posted), where “sovereignty” means “saddled with unpayable debt for generations” and losing the most lucrative parts of its territory, not to mention a generation of men.


And what’s depressing is that almost 2 and a half years in, you guys still are not learning the lessons of why you’ve have been consistently wrong about how this would turn out. You are still waffling on about how you represent “the world” and then being dumb-founded when the majority of the world doesn’t go along with you (Josep Borrell acknowledged this recently*). You are still not listening to anyone outside your increasingly small echo chamber. Everything contrary is still just “Russian propaganda” to you. People like me are still just “paid trolls”.


A miserably predictable pattern has played out. 2 years ago there were 2 broad groups of people. Group A was very, very large. It consisted of poorly-educated people drunk on proxy nationalism declaring that Ukraine was going to defeat Russia. Group B was very, very small. It consisted of people saying that Ukraine would be destroyed if this war wasn’t stopped as soon as possible with peace talks. Group A laughed at Group B and called them delusional fascist-sympathising morons. People who hadn’t heard of Neville Chamberlain a week before started writing with supreme authority about Neville Chamberlain.


2 years on, what Group B said would happen has happened and Group A have been proven wrong. And nevertheless, Group A is continuing to laugh at Group B and call them morons/trolls/bots etc. Because that’s how they operate. It doesn’t matter how many times reality shows them to be wrong again and again and again. Libya, Syria, Iraq, Ukraine, you name it, it will never matter how many times they utterly f*ck everything up with their hubris, they still will never countenance being wrong. Easier instead to dismiss everything as “Russian propaganda” and call for people to be banned.


There is a poster here, I will not name him but I have reported him multiple times (the only time I’ve ever done that). He’s from either Finland or Estonia, I forget which. I have literally never engaged with him. But he periodically sends me PMs calling me every name under the sun. I do not engage with him, ever, as a matter of principle. His disgusting behaviour puts him beneath me. His last message was to tell me he hoped I was having to go to lots and lots of funerals. All of this is accompanied by the inevitable laughing emojis of course (those ‘civilised’ freedom-fighters again you see). And you know what? Yes, I do know people killed by this war, from both Russia and Ukraine. I’ll say again, this war is personal for me. There are people in the Israel thread who basically only post there. I don’t see anyone demanding they justify their presence on the site by posting in other threads as well.


I’m not here to engage with you, 'AfonsoAlves'. That’s my basic reply to you. For the same reason I don’t spend time trawling through the tweets and transcripts of all the other “NATO military intelligence” crowd that I named earlier. It’s impressive to people who haven’t already been reading the whole tired gibberish for literally decades. I’m here to post information that won’t get posted by other people, and from exclusively pro-Ukrainian Western sources so as to circumvent the “Russian propaganda” accusations (again, I under-estimated you). That’s it. People are free (so long as you don't have your way of banning opinions you don't like) to read it or not, they can dismiss Ukraine’s deputy head of military intelligence as “Russian propaganda” (!?) if they want to. But I’m going to post it regardless until told not to by a moderator, in among the smorgasbord of Ilya Ponomorenko tweets about how drunken Russian generals are cramming their smallest soldiers into cannons and inadvertently firing them at their own cities. I will not intrude on your NATO propaganda posts (sorry, but that’s simply what they are in my opinion) here or in the China thread. Possibly the one time I will directly ask your opinion of this war will be when it is over, Russia has achieved the 4 aims it stated it would back in 2022, and I will ask you what, if anything, you have learned from all this. The fates of places like the Philippines and Taiwan rest on all the “NATO military intelligence experts” finally learning some lessons. This for now however will serve as my engagement with you. Because again, there is nothing in it for either one of us.



*Borrell's statement that I mentioned earlier. He's the EU's high representative for foreign affairs. And so, "Russian propaganda" no doubt.

https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2024/02/26/western-dominance-ended-eu-josep-borrell/
 
Last edited:
Apparently an under-estimation.


To be clear, you're saying the exact words of the deputy head of Ukrainian military intelligence, as quoted by one of Britain's most pro-Ukrainian newspapers, are "Russian propaganda"? The exact words of the US Secretary of Defense, as delivered before the House Armed Services Committee are "Russian propaganda"? The words of Ukrainian president Zelenskiy are "Russian propaganda"? And finally, the words of Ukrainian soldiers, as quoted by US media, are "Russian propaganda"?


If 27 months of being wrong about the trajectory of this war is to teach you anything it will hopefully be that not everything that contradicts your assessment of the situation is "Russian propaganda", and not everyone talking common sense is a "paid Russian troll". There is a very basic reason why you’ve been wrong about this war: Russia’s leaders fundamentally mean what they say. Western leaders do not. Ukraine is the latest victim to belatedly discover this. You are listening to the wrong people. Yes, as someone pointed out a while back, I was demonstrably wrong in this thread about the time-line of this war (because I had no idea the West would be insane enough to actually think they could defeat Russia by pumping Ukraine full of weapons). But I have not been wrong about the trajectory.


As for engaging with you, I'll be blunt: you would be a waste of my time. I'll explain why. The first thing you did in your first response to me was to list your CV. And you know when people write "lol" on the internet and you know that at best they probably only smiled a bit? Well I legitimately laughed out loud reading it. And I say this to you with good intentions: the people you're impressing on here with that are the same people who have spent 2 years being impressed with the exact same kinds of blog posts from Phillips O'Brien and Ben Hodges and Hamish de Bretton-Gordon and Michael Clarke and all the other "NATO military experts" who have spent over 2 years promulgating nonsense about this war ("military expert" Phillips O'Brien was interviewed yet again by the BBC 2 weeks ago, talking about how the supplemental would put Ukraine back on the offensive. This is the same guy who said in March 2022 that the Russian army would collapse by May of 2022), but who nevertheless keep on getting posted in this thread as authorities.


That combined with your hubristic posts in the China thread and your statements about being very pro-West and being a part of Euromaidan - look, long story short, I get you, ok? I've had years and years of speaking to and reading folk like you. Your pictures of bicycle GPS glued to Russian jets, your grasp of history, your absolutely fundamental - this is common to almost all you ‘NATO military intelligence’ folk - lack of understanding of Russia; I get you. And you guys are exhausting to talk to because there is nothing on earth that can ever be said that will convince you that you're wrong. Look at your reaction just now - a terse and snarky dismissal of everything as "Russian propaganda", even though they are literally Western outlets quoting Western or Ukrainian officials.


So that's first. Second is this: your first reply to me was to deliver your CV as evidence for why you're qualified to speak on this subject (a major red flag, and very incidentally nothing you wrote in it tells me you're as remotely qualified as I am; its only merit was in helping me understand why you believe the things you do in the face of glaring evidence to the contrary). Your 2nd engagement was to call for me to be banned from this forum. Why? Because I had posted about the supplemental’s demand for a Ukraine strategy and I'd said the Biden Admin would not provide one. I have since been proven correct about that. But being right doesn't matter, does it? What matters is: you went straight to "ban this guy", simply for posting an opinion you did not like and that broke no rules of the forum.


For context - one page before my post, we had someone continuing to spam the place up with infamously garbage Ukrainian propaganda Twitter channels about how the Russian army is putting its soldiers on the tops of tanks as human shields (this genius actually had to have it explained to him why this was nonsense - it didn't occur to him naturally. Ironically this guy laughed at me a few months back for lamenting the state of Western media literacy). This was apparently fine with you. No calls to ban him for crapping up the thread with patent trash yet again. 2 weeks before that, we had another guy, the Quebec fellow, actively calling for Ukraine to mass murder Russian civilians in Crimea. To “get tough”, as he put it. Also seemingly fine with you. No calls for him to be banned.


But my posting an opinion you don’t like? Straight to “ban him”.


So you see what I mean. I get you. There are many, many like you and this war has brought them all to the surface again, as Iraq did and as Libya did (“oh but no, no, this one really IS black and white!!”). I’ve said many times in here for the last couple of years and I’ll probably say it many more times: I wish you “freedom and democracy” guys could hear yourselves sometimes. You are legitimately scary people. You are what you claim to hate. The guy who predicted fascism to one day return in the guise of liberalism had you in mind. Insults, ad hominem and calls for people to be banned for their opinions – these are the default settings of the self-appointed defenders and arbiters of a ‘civilised and liberal world order’.


The guy beneath you asked why I rarely post in any other thread. For many, many years I only lurked on this forum. I was born in Manchester, still have a house in Middleton, and United are my 2nd team. But this Ukraine war is deeply personal to me. I have family in both Russia and Ukraine, as many people involved in this conflict do. This war is not, as it very clearly is for certain people here in this thread, entertainment. I have watched with horror as the lunatics in Western governments have led Ukraine down this garden path, cheered on by weapons salesmen like Hodges and Clarke and their (literally) millions of #slavaukraini followers (I know, I know “But it was PUTIN who invaded!!!” Thanks for the 6-year-old’s grasp of the situation). Ukraine has been systematically destroyed by idiots invoking Neville Chamberlain and totally misstating why this war has happened. With proper Western leadership, it needn’t have gone this way. Ukraine needn’t have been destroyed, with its best-case scenario now being to retain some level of “sovereignty" (per Austin’s words in that video I posted), where “sovereignty” means “saddled with unpayable debt for generations” and losing the most lucrative parts of its territory, not to mention a generation of men.


And what’s depressing is that almost 2 and a half years in, you guys still are not learning the lessons of why you’ve have been consistently wrong about how this would turn out. You are still waffling on about how you represent “the world” and then being dumb-founded when the majority of the world doesn’t go along with you (Josep Borrell acknowledged this recently*). You are still not listening to anyone outside your increasingly small echo chamber. Everything contrary is still just “Russian propaganda” to you. People like me are still just “paid trolls”.


A miserably predictable pattern has played out. 2 years ago there were 2 broad groups of people. Group A was very, very large. It consisted of poorly-educated people drunk on proxy nationalism declaring that Ukraine was going to defeat Russia. Group B was very, very small. It consisted of people saying that Ukraine would be destroyed if this war wasn’t stopped as soon as possible with peace talks. Group A laughed at Group B and called them delusional fascist-sympathising morons. People who hadn’t heard of Neville Chamberlain a week before started writing with supreme authority about Neville Chamberlain.


2 years on, what Group B said would happen has happened and Group A have been proven wrong. And nevertheless, Group A is continuing to laugh at Group B and call them morons/trolls/bots etc. Because that’s how they operate. It doesn’t matter how many times reality shows them to be wrong again and again and again. Libya, Syria, Iraq, Ukraine, you name it, it will never matter how many times they utterly f*ck everything up with their hubris, they still will never countenance being wrong. Easier instead to dismiss everything as “Russian propaganda” and call for people to be banned.


There is a poster here, I will not name him but I have reported him multiple times (the only time I’ve ever done that). He’s from either Finland or Estonia, I forget which. I have literally never engaged with him. But he periodically sends me PMs calling me every name under the sun. I do not engage with him, ever, as a matter of principle. His disgusting behaviour puts him beneath me. His last message was to tell me he hoped I was having to go to lots and lots of funerals. All of this is accompanied by the inevitable laughing emojis of course (those ‘civilised’ freedom-fighters again you see). And you know what? Yes, I do know people killed by this war, from both Russia and Ukraine. I’ll say again, this war is personal for me. There are people in the Israel thread who basically only post there. I don’t see anyone demanding they justify their presence on the site by posting in other threads as well.


I’m not here to engage with you, 'AfonsoAlves'. That’s my basic reply to you. For the same reason I don’t spend time trawling through the tweets and transcripts of all the other “NATO military intelligence” crowd that I named earlier. It’s impressive to people who haven’t already been reading the whole tired gibberish for literally decades. I’m here to post information that won’t get posted by other people, and from exclusively Western sources so as to circumvent the “Russian propaganda” accusations (again, I under-estimated you). That’s it. People are free to read it or not, they can dismiss Ukraine’s deputy head of military intelligence as “Russian propaganda” (!?) if they want to. But I’m going to post it regardless until told not to by a moderator, in among the smorgasbord of Ilya Ponomorenko tweets about how drunken Russian generals are cramming their smallest soldiers into cannons and inadvertently firing them at their own cities. I will not intrude on your NATO propaganda posts (sorry, but that’s simply what they are in my opinion) here or in the China thread. Possibly the one time I will directly ask your opinion of this war will be when it is over, Russia has achieved the 4 aims it stated it would back in 2022, and I will ask you what, if anything, you have learned from all this. The fates of places like the Philippines and Taiwan rest on all the “NATO military intelligence experts” finally learning some lessons. This for now however will serve as my engagement with you. Because again, there is nothing in it for either one of us.



*Borrell's statement that I mentioned earlier. He's the EU's high representative for foreign affairs. So "Russian propaganda" no doubt.

https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2024/02/26/western-dominance-ended-eu-josep-borrell/

*I will not engage with you*
*Block text telling me why I'm a terrible human being*

You also miss the point entirely.

I'm not saying you are a propoganda pusher because what you say has a bias-tilt. We all do.

I'm pointing out the absolute absurdity of a poster who signed up to a football forum, to seemingly solely argue for the purpose of pushing pro-Russian viewpoints on a Manchester United forum without *any* engagement on any level on any other subject.

Regarding your point about my lack of understanding of Russia (I'm not going to address the other stuff because it's just rambling to be frank), I do understand Russia's point of view.

I've heard the points argued from both an in person official discussion, in Russia, to reading Russian forums to speaking to my pro-Russian friends.

I understand the Russian need for "buffers," the weird tilt they have towards the post-Soviet collapse and the paranoia and fear of invasion from the West because of centuries of history pertaining to this.

Let me tell you this, I can understand Russian motivations as well as telling you they're a load of horseshit and we should not cuddle to "Russian interests" that are devolved from fear, paranoia and an intrinsic misunderstanding of Western motivations.
What you're basically saying is, "We should let the Nazi's do what they want because we're failing to understand their motivations for wanting to gain Lebensraum in the East", but instead put in the modern Ukraine situation.

The Russian motivation is wrong, the Russian motivation is barbaric, depraved of any geopolitical reality and understanding and born out of a misguided sense of entitlement to a fade of Empire building that most nations agreed should belong to the past.
Why should the West listen to these "Russian interests" when they clearly belong to another time?

I also take extreme issue with you somehow issuing blame the parties that are supporting the Nation being invaded, because of the fact that "Russian interests must be met." What about Ukrainian interests? What about the fact that we fecking voted for the EU and Russia undergoes constant aggression to stop us doing this. We didn't fecking care about NATO in 2014, it was entirely an EU issue. You don't give a feck about acknowledgement of parties interests, because you have given 0 consideration of Ukraine's interests.
 
Last edited:
Or let me put it to you in no uncertain terms, were Poland to say to Russia:

"Due to historic grief, Poland wants a 500km demilitarized zone on Russia's Western Border, and if you don't comply we will invade Belarus to make our own"

How would you feel? Aggrieved? Of course you bloody would, because it's a ridiculous demand. Yet that is what Russia is demanding.
 
Ask him some questions about Everton. I don‘t believe he‘s not a troll either.
 
Poorly formatted post
I also take extreme issue with you somehow issuing blame the parties that are supporting the Nation being invaded, because of the fact that "Russian interests must be met."

Quick note on this. I have neve blamed countries supporting Ukraine because "Russian interests must be met". I never write about what should be, I write about what is going to be. I have never said anything remotely like "Russia's interests must be met". I say that they are irrevocably going to be met, in enormous part because of the idiocy of Western leaders, and at the senseless expense of Ukraine and Ukrainians. I am basically the only person in this thread who has spent 2 years demanding an actual, achievable Western strategy for Ukraine, that didn't involve nebulous parroting about "for as long as it takes" (will somebody in any Western government for the love of God finally answer this question: for as long as it takes to do what???) from self-interested Western leaders looking to distract from their own domestic problems. The West has not "supported" Ukraine, as you put it. They have used it. Supporting Ukraine would have been doing and giving absolutely everything within their power for Ukraine to win this war. They have not done that, despite prattling on about how "existential" this war is for the West itself. I said years before this war started that Ukraine would be sacrificed by the West (an uncontroversial opinion back then), and it has happened. It was I, in this thread, who said that the West needs to give Ukraine everything it needs to win the war, or else stop stringing them along with this piecemeal drip-feeding of a few tanks here, a few planes there, like they have been doing. With Blinken-level predictability you have invoked appeasement of the Nazis for why Russia must be stopped. Fine! F*CKING STOP THEM THEN! What you have been doing for 2 years is not stopping them, it is killing Ukraine. Do you understand me? STOP dismissing me as a Russian troll or whatever. I am literally the only person here who has been asking: what is the West's strategy for Ukraine to win this war? Because what they have been doing is not saving Ukraine, it is killing it.

Edit - formatting fixed by staff.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ask him some questions about Everton. I don‘t believe he‘s not a troll either.
My username is 'Isaiah' on this Everton forum, on which I'm very active on footballing matters:

www.toffeetalk.com

Feel free to swing by and say hi.

I also use the same username as here (DT12) on www.grandoldteam.com, but I am less active there. But please still feel free to drop me a line and test my Everton bona fides.

On neither forum have I ever posted about politics. I only post about football. Neither of those forums has a thread quite like the absolute sheer f*cking insanity of this one.

I'll say it again for you: not everything you don't like to hear is "paid Russian propaganda trolling".
 
Last edited:
Was listening to a Ukrainian military podcast with English subs where several troops get interviewed. The topic of mobilization is very hot and sensitive.

Unless troops get rotated, the frontline will eventually break. And there's a sense of frustration that the rest of Ukraine doesn't seem to feel the urgency.

Mind, these are feelings of a couple of individual soldiers. But the situation looks dire if troops aren't rotated.
 
I’d like to see you stick around for what it’s worth. At the same time it would be nice to see you acknowledge some of the stuff you got badly wrong in your bullish posts from May and June 2022 before you pretty much disappeared from the thread for about a year, during which Ukraine did regain a significant amount of territory. Especially since you clearly delight in pointing out others’ wayward predictions.

I also think some of the grief you’re getting here is due to the feeling that you’re basically in support of Russia’s war aims, whatever the reality of the situation. Perhaps some clarification from you on that point would help move things forward.

@DT12

For what it's worth, I remember this post months ago and it still applies now I think.

You provide a dissenting voice on this thread and actually a lot of the stuff you post probably isn't even wrong as such.

When it seems that you're in support of Russian war aims, as opposed to merely articulating a position, it clearly rubs people up the wrong way.
 
@DT12

For what it's worth, I remember this post months ago and it still applies now I think.

You provide a dissenting voice on this thread and actually a lot of the stuff you post probably isn't even wrong as such.

When it seems that you're in support of Russian war aims, as opposed to merely articulating a position, it clearly rubs people up the wrong way.

I think he supports russian aims and specially despise the West propaganda, that exist and there is a lot of it

I dont like that he sides on the russia camp, for obvious reasons, but certain points are correct, but as @2cents mentioned, he made some predictions that didnt happened at a time and there was a moment that ukraine had the uperhand and seemed that they were about to succeed. Now is the other way around and it is easy to go with upwind. But if for whatever reason it changes probably he will disappear again

It is easy to predict with your tide in favour

At the same time, the same can be said of many others that russia would fold in months, that the economy woild make russia surrender and many predictions that didnt happen.

All in all, there us a lot to disregard of @DT12 , but there are some realities that we dont like to accept
 
I think he supports russian aims and specially despise the West propaganda, that exist and there is a lot of it

I dont like that he sides on the russia camp, for obvious reasons, but certain points are correct, but as @2cents mentioned, he made some predictions that didnt happened at a time and there was a moment that ukraine had the uperhand and seemed that they were about to succeed. Now is the other way around and it is easy to go with upwind. But if for whatever reason it changes probably he will disappear again

It is easy to predict with your tide in favour

At the same time, the same can be said of many others that russia would fold in months, that the economy woild make russia surrender and many predictions that didnt happen.

All in all, there us a lot to disregard of @DT12 , but there are some realities that we dont like to accept
Yeah, the 'Well I'm here' line is pretty funny.

He's here until he wont be, depending on the situation at the front.

Love the Russia will achieve 4 aims from 2022 part too. Since they changed those aims few times already. From toppling a Kiev government to capturing all of Donbas.
 
@DT12

For what it's worth, I remember this post months ago and it still applies now I think.

You provide a dissenting voice on this thread and actually a lot of the stuff you post probably isn't even wrong as such.

When it seems that you're in support of Russian war aims, as opposed to merely articulating a position, it clearly rubs people up the wrong way.

I went and read @DT12’s posts in the Newbies after posting that, and they display what seems to me to be genuine sympathy for the plight of Ukraine and criticism of Putin’s decision to invade and Russian actions since. I would say their tone is considerably different to his posts in this thread.
 
Here we go again with the D12 stuff. Can't wait to do the exact same "I'm sure you have good intentions, it's nice to have a dissenting voice" in four months, and then half a year after that, and then two more times in 2025 (when his "what I've been saying all along" has changed even more).

And the response will always come in the form of a far too long rant that does exactly what he accuses other people of doing.
 
D12‘s views are exactly aligned with Russia‘s aims. That is all there is to it imo.
 
He has to be a paid troll. If he's not then he's a fool, leaving money on the table.
 
Apparently an under-estimation.


To be clear, you're saying the exact words of the deputy head of Ukrainian military intelligence, as quoted by one of Britain's most pro-Ukrainian newspapers, are "Russian propaganda"? The exact words of the US Secretary of Defense, as delivered before the House Armed Services Committee are "Russian propaganda"? The words of Ukrainian president Zelenskiy are "Russian propaganda"? And finally, the words of Ukrainian soldiers, as quoted by US media, are "Russian propaganda"?


If 27 months of being wrong about the trajectory of this war is to teach you anything it will hopefully be that not everything that contradicts your assessment of the situation is "Russian propaganda", and not everyone talking common sense is a "paid Russian troll". There is a very basic reason why you’ve been wrong about this war: Russia’s leaders fundamentally mean what they say. Western leaders do not. Ukraine is the latest victim to belatedly discover this. You are listening to the wrong people. Yes, as someone pointed out a while back, I was demonstrably wrong in this thread about the time-line of this war (because I had no idea the West would be insane enough to actually think they could defeat Russia by pumping Ukraine full of weapons). But I have not been wrong about the trajectory.


As for engaging with you, I'll be blunt: you would be a waste of my time. I'll explain why. The first thing you did in your first response to me was to list your CV. And you know when people write "lol" on the internet and you know that at best they probably only smiled a bit? Well I legitimately laughed out loud reading it. And I say this to you with good intentions: the people you're impressing on here with that are the same people who have spent 2 years being impressed with the exact same kinds of blog posts from Phillips O'Brien and Ben Hodges and Hamish de Bretton-Gordon and Michael Clarke and all the other "NATO military experts" who have spent over 2 years promulgating nonsense about this war ("military expert" Phillips O'Brien was interviewed yet again by the BBC 2 weeks ago, talking about how the supplemental would put Ukraine back on the offensive. This is the same guy who said in March 2022 that the Russian army would collapse by May of 2022), but who nevertheless keep on getting posted in this thread as authorities.


That combined with your hubristic posts in the China thread and your statements about being very pro-West and being a part of Euromaidan - look, long story short, I get you, ok? I've had years and years of speaking to and reading folk like you. Your pictures of bicycle GPS glued to Russian jets, your facile grasp of history, your absolutely fundamental - this is common to almost all you ‘NATO military intelligence’ folk - lack of understanding of Russia; I get you. And you guys are exhausting to talk to because there is nothing on earth that can ever be said that will convince you that you're wrong. Look at your reaction just now - a terse and snarky dismissal of everything as "Russian propaganda", even though they are literally Western outlets quoting Western or Ukrainian officials.


So that's first. Second is this: your first reply to me was to deliver your CV as evidence for why you're qualified to speak on this subject (a major red flag, and very incidentally nothing you wrote in it tells me you're as remotely qualified as I am; its only merit was in helping me understand why you believe the things you do in the face of glaring evidence to the contrary). Your 2nd engagement was to call for me to be banned from this forum. Why? Because I had posted about the supplemental’s demand for a Ukraine strategy and I'd said the Biden Admin would not provide one. I have since been proven correct about that. But being right doesn't matter, does it? What matters is: you went straight to "ban this guy", simply for posting an opinion you did not like and that broke no rules of the forum.


For context - one page before my post, we had someone continuing to spam the place up with infamously garbage Ukrainian propaganda Twitter channels about how the Russian army is putting its soldiers on the tops of tanks as human shields (this genius actually had to have it explained to him why this was nonsense - it didn't occur to him naturally. Ironically this guy laughed at me a few months back for lamenting the state of Western media literacy). This was apparently fine with you. No calls to ban him for crapping up the thread with patent trash yet again. 2 weeks before that, we had another guy, the Quebec fellow, actively calling for Ukraine to mass murder Russian civilians in Crimea. To “get tough”, as he put it. Also seemingly fine with you. No calls for him to be banned.


But my posting an opinion you don’t like? Straight to “ban him”.


So you see what I mean. I get you. There are many, many like you and this war has brought them all to the surface again, as Iraq did and as Libya did (“oh but no, no, this one really IS black and white!!”). I’ve said many times in here for the last couple of years and I’ll probably say it many more times: I wish you “freedom and democracy” guys could hear yourselves sometimes. You are legitimately scary people. You are what you claim to hate. The guy who predicted fascism to one day return in the guise of liberalism had you in mind. Insults, ad hominem and calls for people to be banned for their opinions – these are the default settings of the self-appointed defenders and arbiters of a ‘civilised and liberal world order’.


The guy beneath you asked why I rarely post in any other thread. For many, many years I only lurked on this forum. I was born in Manchester, still have a house in Middleton, and United are my 2nd team. But this Ukraine war is deeply personal to me. I have family in both Russia and Ukraine, as many people involved in this conflict do. This war is not, as it very clearly is for certain people here in this thread, entertainment. I have watched with horror as the lunatics in Western governments have led Ukraine down this garden path, cheered on by weapons salesmen like Hodges and Clarke and their (literally) millions of #slavaukraini followers (I know, I know “But it was PUTIN who invaded!!!” Thanks for the 6-year-old’s grasp of the situation). Ukraine has been systematically destroyed by idiots invoking Neville Chamberlain and totally misstating why this war has happened. With proper Western leadership, it needn’t have gone this way. Ukraine needn’t have been destroyed, with its best-case scenario now being to retain some level of “sovereignty" (per Austin’s words in that video I posted), where “sovereignty” means “saddled with unpayable debt for generations” and losing the most lucrative parts of its territory, not to mention a generation of men.


And what’s depressing is that almost 2 and a half years in, you guys still are not learning the lessons of why you’ve have been consistently wrong about how this would turn out. You are still waffling on about how you represent “the world” and then being dumb-founded when the majority of the world doesn’t go along with you (Josep Borrell acknowledged this recently*). You are still not listening to anyone outside your increasingly small echo chamber. Everything contrary is still just “Russian propaganda” to you. People like me are still just “paid trolls”.


A miserably predictable pattern has played out. 2 years ago there were 2 broad groups of people. Group A was very, very large. It consisted of poorly-educated people drunk on proxy nationalism declaring that Ukraine was going to defeat Russia. Group B was very, very small. It consisted of people saying that Ukraine would be destroyed if this war wasn’t stopped as soon as possible with peace talks. Group A laughed at Group B and called them delusional fascist-sympathising morons. People who hadn’t heard of Neville Chamberlain a week before started writing with supreme authority about Neville Chamberlain.


2 years on, what Group B said would happen has happened and Group A have been proven wrong. And nevertheless, Group A is continuing to laugh at Group B and call them morons/trolls/bots etc. Because that’s how they operate. It doesn’t matter how many times reality shows them to be wrong again and again and again. Libya, Syria, Iraq, Ukraine, you name it, it will never matter how many times they utterly f*ck everything up with their hubris, they still will never countenance being wrong. Easier instead to dismiss everything as “Russian propaganda” and call for people to be banned.


There is a poster here, I will not name him but I have reported him multiple times (the only time I’ve ever done that). He’s from either Finland or Estonia, I forget which. I have literally never engaged with him. But he periodically sends me PMs calling me every name under the sun. I do not engage with him, ever, as a matter of principle. His disgusting behaviour puts him beneath me. His last message was to tell me he hoped I was having to go to lots and lots of funerals. All of this is accompanied by the inevitable laughing emojis of course (those ‘civilised’ freedom-fighters again you see). And you know what? Yes, I do know people killed by this war, from both Russia and Ukraine. I’ll say again, this war is personal for me. There are people in the Israel thread who basically only post there. I don’t see anyone demanding they justify their presence on the site by posting in other threads as well.


I’m not here to engage with you, 'AfonsoAlves'. That’s my basic reply to you. For the same reason I don’t spend time trawling through the tweets and transcripts of all the other “NATO military intelligence” crowd that I named earlier. It’s impressive to people who haven’t already been reading the whole tired gibberish for literally decades. I’m here to post information that won’t get posted by other people, and from exclusively pro-Ukrainian Western sources so as to circumvent the “Russian propaganda” accusations (again, I under-estimated you). That’s it. People are free (so long as you don't have your way of banning opinions you don't like) to read it or not, they can dismiss Ukraine’s deputy head of military intelligence as “Russian propaganda” (!?) if they want to. But I’m going to post it regardless until told not to by a moderator, in among the smorgasbord of Ilya Ponomorenko tweets about how drunken Russian generals are cramming their smallest soldiers into cannons and inadvertently firing them at their own cities. I will not intrude on your NATO propaganda posts (sorry, but that’s simply what they are in my opinion) here or in the China thread. Possibly the one time I will directly ask your opinion of this war will be when it is over, Russia has achieved the 4 aims it stated it would back in 2022, and I will ask you what, if anything, you have learned from all this. The fates of places like the Philippines and Taiwan rest on all the “NATO military intelligence experts” finally learning some lessons. This for now however will serve as my engagement with you. Because again, there is nothing in it for either one of us.



*Borrell's statement that I mentioned earlier. He's the EU's high representative for foreign affairs. And so, "Russian propaganda" no doubt.

https://geopoliticaleconomy.com/2024/02/26/western-dominance-ended-eu-josep-borrell/

For apparently not being worth the the time to engage, that's an enormous post engaging him.
 
For some reason this image cracks me up. R/noncredibledefense mentioned the Loochador from Just Cause 3.

 
Last edited:
For some reason this image cracks me up. R/noncredibledefense mentioned the Loochador from Just Cause 3.



After some Russian mentioned these this morning saying they don't work Ukraine released some test footage of a failure like "Yeah you've nothing to worry about, honest".
 


Enjoy Russia, you dumb Tumpist. The US are not obligated to take him back in any prisoner swap, even if the guy is a member of the military who let his mates down and went AWOL.
 
How is it a tangent when you’re the one making that claim that Russia has air supremacy? If you don’t want to be challenged on technical meanings of words you don’t understand, don’t use them
Don't bother with the Elon Musk of the caf.
 
DOD announced another package for Ukraine worth $400m

The capabilities in this announcement include:


  • Additional munitions for Patriot air defense systems;
  • Additional munitions for National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems (NASAMS);
  • Stinger anti-aircraft missiles;
  • Equipment to integrate Western launchers, missiles, and radars with Ukraine's systems;
  • Additional High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems(HIMARS) and ammunition;
  • 155mm and 105mm artillery rounds;
  • Bradley Infantry Fighting Vehicles;
  • M113 Armored Personnel Carriers;
  • Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles;
  • Trailers to transport heavy equipment;
  • Tube-Launched, Optically-Tracked, Wire-Guided (TOW) missiles;
  • Javelin and AT-4 anti-armor systems;
  • Precision aerial munitions;
  • High-speed Anti-radiation missiles (HARMs);
  • Small arms and additional rounds of small arms ammunition and grenades;
  • Demolitions munitions and equipment for obstacle clearing;
  • Coastal and riverine patrol boats;
  • Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear protective equipment; and
  • Spare parts, training munitions, maintenance, and other ancillary equipment.

https://www.defense.gov/News/Releas...s-additional-security-assistance-for-ukraine/
 
I actually wasn't planning to post this, because Boris Johnson's Brexit and Covid guru is not the most unimpeachable source of wisdom, but since the #SlavaUkraini brigade have just turned on 'AfonsoAlves' of all people in the Eurovision thread for writing what ought to be basic common knowledge at this point, I've decided to go ahead.

https://www.globalvillagespace.com/ukraine-a-corrupt-sthole-ex-boris-johnson-adviser/

Most of the lines are quotable but I'll go with:

“The lesson we’ve taught Putin is that we’re a bunch of total f**king jokers,” he said. “I mean, Putin already knew that before the war. But this has emphasized it and broadcast it to the entire world, what a bunch of clowns we are"

There's a lot I'd expand on there, and I'd change the word "Putin" to "entire non-Western world", but the sentiment is good enough. The single greatest use of political technology I've ever witnessed was how the West dressed Zelenskiy up like an Action Man figure and actually managed to convince an entire continent of credulous simpletons that he was the "new Winston Churchill" single-handedly fighting to save global democracy and freedom.

As I said, I wasn't planning to post my weekly dose of "Russian propaganda" but the reaction to AA's posts in the Eurovision thread were too apt an opportunity to let by.
 
I actually wasn't planning to post this, because Boris Johnson's Brexit and Covid guru is not the most unimpeachable source of wisdom, but since the #SlavaUkraini brigade have just turned on 'AfonsoAlves' of all people in the Eurovision thread for writing what ought to be basic common knowledge at this point, I've decided to go ahead.

https://www.globalvillagespace.com/ukraine-a-corrupt-sthole-ex-boris-johnson-adviser/

Most of the lines are quotable but I'll go with:

“The lesson we’ve taught Putin is that we’re a bunch of total f**king jokers,” he said. “I mean, Putin already knew that before the war. But this has emphasized it and broadcast it to the entire world, what a bunch of clowns we are"

There's a lot I'd expand on there, and I'd change the word "Putin" to "entire non-Western world", but the sentiment is good enough. The single greatest use of political technology I've ever witnessed was how the West dressed Zelenskiy up like an Action Man figure and actually managed to convince an entire continent of credulous simpletons that he was the "new Winston Churchill" single-handedly fighting to save global democracy and freedom.

As I said, I wasn't planning to post my weekly dose of "Russian propaganda" but the reaction to AA's posts in the Eurovision thread were too apt an opportunity to let by.

Please don't use contextual misunderstanding and my poorly worded contexts to launch another triade please. We know where you stand, and that's fine. Just please don't piggyback off me, thanks.
 
Maybe i'm being irrational then.

But I just feel awful that Russia are not there for being brutal as a nation amongst other things and we're there smiling and cheering and taking all the applause when we're the exact same as the Russians in many regards.
No one is pretending that Ukraine is a perfect country. We're all quite well aware of the corruption and Russia-esque oligarchic structures. And there has been reporting on the tough mobilization methods used by Ukraine's government so we're aware of that too.

But you're gonna have to offer evidence, besides anectodal ones, that today's Ukraine is:
  • Killing or jailing political opponents in the ways that happened to Kara-Murza, Navalny, Nemtsov etc.
  • Arresting journalists, artists, human rights activists in masses.
  • Sending violent criminals to war and then pardoning them back into society.
  • Etc etc etc.

I'm not necessarily saying you're wrong. I don't live in Ukraine and I'm absolutely willing to believe that Western media might not be reporting on all bad things done by the Ukrainian government. But you understand that we can't exactly believe you at your word either on all your claims about how Ukraine is now equivalent to Russia in its domestic behavior.

I'm aware of critical articles towards Zelensky's government on press freedom and if anything shady is happening, it should be called out.

But again, we know Ukraine isn't perfect. But it's you who claims that it's now equivalent to Russia in many regards.
 
There's the post-invasion banning of political parties. The argument is of them being overtly pro-Russian (some linked to Medvedchuk if I recall correctly).

How do you view this @AfonsoAlves ?
 
Last edited:
No one is pretending that Ukraine is a perfect country. We're all quite well aware of the corruption and Russia-esque oligarchic structures. And there has been reporting on the tough mobilization methods used by Ukraine's government so we're aware of that too.

But you're gonna have to offer evidence, besides anectodal ones, that today's Ukraine is:
  • Killing or jailing political opponents in the ways that happened to Kara-Murza, Navalny, Nemtsov etc.
  • Arresting journalists, artists, human rights activists in masses.
  • Sending violent criminals to war and then pardoning them back into society.
  • Etc etc etc.

I'm not necessarily saying you're wrong. I don't live in Ukraine and I'm absolutely willing to believe that Western media might not be reporting on all bad things done by the Ukrainian government. But you understand that we can't exactly believe you at your word either on all your claims about how Ukraine is now equivalent to Russia in its domestic behavior.

I'm aware of critical articles towards Zelensky's government on press freedom and if anything shady is happening, it should be called out.

But again, we know Ukraine isn't perfect. But it's you who claims that it's now equivalent to Russia in many regards.

I never said, "all ways," but "many regards."

Regarding political opponents, it was a long and slowly escalated path. Since 2015 "Communist symbology" started to get banned and then by a year into the war, all "communist" parties were outlawed and many of its leaders arrested and interrogated. No news on what happened to them after.

https://www.kyivpost.com/post/7840

Ukraine doesn't arrest Journalists, artists and such, as far as I am aware of. But I'm also aware that barely anyone has reported anything anti-government or anti-Ukraine so I'm not sure where the balance of that is.

Just a week ago, the country began drafting policy to recruit prisoners in exchange for pardon or lessened sentences. There have been exemptions made for the worst, like murderers and rapists, but still, another sticky road that we're going towards.

https://www.politico.eu/article/ukr...ilization-of-convicts-for-war-ukraine-russia/

Since the war, we've not had any elections (which is fine), but what really pisses me and many others off is that there is no joint war cabinet. It's been Zelensky and the party running the entire show. Other viewpoints are not considered at all.

There are many reports you can find of people being fired at (as happened to a family member of mine) trying to escape Ukraine.

Ukraine has abandoned all consulate services for active military age males abroad - doesn't matter when you left Ukraine or for what purpose, you will have no consulate access for things like renewing your visa or having problems regarding your stay in a foreign country if you're a military age male.
 
There's the banning of political parties. The argument is of them being overtly pro-Russian (some linked to Medvedchuk if I recall correctly).

How do you view this @AfonsoAlves ?

Some of the parties were rightfully banned, with many of the leaders of them being pretty blatantly in bed with the Russians or having very weird ties to FSB, I understand in war-time it is not worth the risk.

Others were very weird, and others were simply opportunity grabs to target people they didn't like.

For example, the socialist party was banned and their leader, Vik Zaika was jailed for "illicitly agreeing to carve up Ukraine with Russian generals post war." Only, this is the equivalent of a claim that the russians made a deal to split the country with Nigel Farage or something, Zaika was pretty politically irrelevant by that point.
Another example was members of the "Ukrainian Afghan Veterans Party" got arrested and interrogated for having "close ties to the socialist party."
OPZH got disbanded and disavowed despite being one of the most vocal critics of the Russian invasion, and they were center-left in retrospect to all the other left wing Ukr parties. Mainly because they were the main opponents in the early 2010's and wanted to have closer ties to Russia economically rather than the EU. Or that was the justification.

Everything else was just thrown in under what is practically the Ukrainian version of McCarthyism. Everyone who is communist is interrogated and any political association is disenfranchised. FFS last year we passed a law that banned residential buildings that looked like Soviet Era "Communist" Architecture residential flats.
 
Oh and the decision to remove Zaluzhnyi - entirely political because he was so popular he started to become a threat to Zelensky.

He was the most popular of the commanders in the whole AFU and he was forced to retire from the military and is now the ambassador to Britain. Absolute shitshow that was.

Also replaced by an absolute melt but is favoured by Zelensky.

Complete Shoigu/Putin vibes here.
 
I actually wasn't planning to post this, because Boris Johnson's Brexit and Covid guru is not the most unimpeachable source of wisdom, but since the #SlavaUkraini brigade have just turned on 'AfonsoAlves' of all people in the Eurovision thread for writing what ought to be basic common knowledge at this point, I've decided to go ahead.

https://www.globalvillagespace.com/ukraine-a-corrupt-sthole-ex-boris-johnson-adviser/

Most of the lines are quotable but I'll go with:

“The lesson we’ve taught Putin is that we’re a bunch of total f**king jokers,” he said. “I mean, Putin already knew that before the war. But this has emphasized it and broadcast it to the entire world, what a bunch of clowns we are"

There's a lot I'd expand on there, and I'd change the word "Putin" to "entire non-Western world", but the sentiment is good enough. The single greatest use of political technology I've ever witnessed was how the West dressed Zelenskiy up like an Action Man figure and actually managed to convince an entire continent of credulous simpletons that he was the "new Winston Churchill" single-handedly fighting to save global democracy and freedom.

As I said, I wasn't planning to post my weekly dose of "Russian propaganda" but the reaction to AA's posts in the Eurovision thread were too apt an opportunity to let by.

Dominic Cummings ffs.

Original interview they took the quotes from by the way for those who prefer a proper source.
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/cummings-boris-saved-thousands-covid-wont-talk-3040481
 
I never said, "all ways," but "many regards."

Regarding political opponents, it was a long and slowly escalated path. Since 2015 "Communist symbology" started to get banned and then by a year into the war, all "communist" parties were outlawed and many of its leaders arrested and interrogated. No news on what happened to them after.

https://www.kyivpost.com/post/7840

Ukraine doesn't arrest Journalists, artists and such, as far as I am aware of. But I'm also aware that barely anyone has reported anything anti-government or anti-Ukraine so I'm not sure where the balance of that is.

Just a week ago, the country began drafting policy to recruit prisoners in exchange for pardon or lessened sentences. There have been exemptions made for the worst, like murderers and rapists, but still, another sticky road that we're going towards.

https://www.politico.eu/article/ukr...ilization-of-convicts-for-war-ukraine-russia/

Since the war, we've not had any elections (which is fine), but what really pisses me and many others off is that there is no joint war cabinet. It's been Zelensky and the party running the entire show. Other viewpoints are not considered at all.

There are many reports you can find of people being fired at (as happened to a family member of mine) trying to escape Ukraine.

Ukraine has abandoned all consulate services for active military age males abroad - doesn't matter when you left Ukraine or for what purpose, you will have no consulate access for things like renewing your visa or having problems regarding your stay in a foreign country if you're a military age male.
Let's be clear about why I quoted you. It was you arguing how Ukraine is now no better than Russia and also deserves to be banned from international events if Russia must be banned. The "I meant several ways, not all ways" argument is unconvincing to me in that particular context. You are willing to go very far in equating Ukraine with Russia.

This isn't about providing a list of all bad things done by Ukraine in a post-2014 context of fighting against Russian aggression. There's plenty of bad stuff to be mentioned which I have no interest of whitewashing. But frankly, I am also not convinced to go along with your line of thinking.

But let's take it piece by piece.

Your KyivPost article is in the context of post-2014 tensions with these communist parties who are accused of supporting the annexation of Crimea and Russian activity in the eastern provinces. I'm aware of the possibility of that being used as a pretext for getting rid of political opponents. Do you think that's what happened there?

You aren't aware of people getting arrested in masses for going against the government. Okay. For the record, I regularly watch the Hromadske channel on Youtube. There is plenty of criticism aimed at the government in interviews with frontline troops. Is it your expectation that the Zelensky government will crack down on Hromadske?

As for the prisoners, I specifically referred to violent criminals which seem to be exempted in the Ukrainian proposal. Still, I agree that even recruiting non-violent criminals is a controversial measure to take and deserves to be criticized.

I also agree that abandoning consulate services is bad.
 
Some of the parties were rightfully banned, with many of the leaders of them being pretty blatantly in bed with the Russians or having very weird ties to FSB, I understand in war-time it is not worth the risk.

Others were very weird, and others were simply opportunity grabs to target people they didn't like.

For example, the socialist party was banned and their leader, Vik Zaika was jailed for "illicitly agreeing to carve up Ukraine with Russian generals post war." Only, this is the equivalent of a claim that the russians made a deal to split the country with Nigel Farage or something, Zaika was pretty politically irrelevant by that point.
Another example was members of the "Ukrainian Afghan Veterans Party" got arrested and interrogated for having "close ties to the socialist party."
OPZH got disbanded and disavowed despite being one of the most vocal critics of the Russian invasion, and they were center-left in retrospect to all the other left wing Ukr parties. Mainly because they were the main opponents in the early 2010's and wanted to have closer ties to Russia economically rather than the EU. Or that was the justification.

Everything else was just thrown in under what is practically the Ukrainian version of McCarthyism. Everyone who is communist is interrogated and any political association is disenfranchised. FFS last year we passed a law that banned residential buildings that looked like Soviet Era "Communist" Architecture residential flats.
That someone is politically irrelevant in itself is an irrelevant argument in the context of committing treason. Regular civilians also get arrested for that. Had it been credibly proven that this Vik Zaika fella was in treasonous territory in your opinion?

As for the rest of the post, thanks for clarifying.
 
Oh and the decision to remove Zaluzhnyi - entirely political because he was so popular he started to become a threat to Zelensky.

He was the most popular of the commanders in the whole AFU and he was forced to retire from the military and is now the ambassador to Britain. Absolute shitshow that was.

Also replaced by an absolute melt but is favoured by Zelensky.

Complete Shoigu/Putin vibes here.
But you do realize that Zaluzhny wasn't arrested or died by falling out of a window? Do you think firing Zaluzhny as general and then appointing him ambassador to Britain is a valid argument to give under an overarching argument that Ukraine is no better than Russia, hence deserved to be banned too from international events?

I agree it was a shitshow by the way. Though I will want to make a point that civilian governments replacing generals is hardly a criminal thing to do. It must be done with good reasons though.