Terminator
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2015
- Messages
- 1,928
Is he an actual DM or a faux DM who passes the ball well and does it aesthetically?
Is he an actual DM or a faux DM who passes the ball well and does it aesthetically?
As devilish said he's a deep lying playmaker so you'd be signing for his passing rather than defensive nous. The issue is that I don't he's got the speed of mind and flight of feet to deal with a lack of space.Is he an actual DM or a faux DM who passes the ball well and does it aesthetically?
I agree.In my opinion Pogba's career with us ended the moment Bruno was signed and we refused to sign a WC DM, Kante style. Neves allows us to have a very functional CM without too many modifications. What Neves can't do is play as a DM especially side by side to Pogba. That's a bridge too far for him.
As devilish said he's a deep lying playmaker so you'd be signing for his passing rather than defensive nous. The issue is that I don't he's got the speed of mind and flight of feet to deal with a lack of space.
And how much better we'd be for it. We've not had a capable deep lying playmaker since Carrick.He's a deep lying playmaker. His defensive contribution is decent for a player in that role but he's not a DM.
Is he an actual DM or a faux DM who passes the ball well and does it aesthetically?
If that’s the case, and I’m not sure as I’ve not watched a great deal of him at Wolves, then we definitely should not be interested.He's a deep lying playmaker. His defensive contribution is decent for a player in that role but he's not a DM.
Hes not like Matic, hes someone who runs the game for a team, we don't have anyone who can do that.If that’s the case, and I’m not sure as I’ve not watched a great deal of him at Wolves, then we definitely should not be interested.
Basically a tidy passer but painfully slow? We have Matic already who ticks those boxes.
As far as I can see we aren’t strongly linked anyway. We seem to be creating this link with him here on the caf.
Is he though? Is he better in possession, at press resistance and a more progressive passer than Matic?Hes not like Matic, hes someone who runs the game for a team, we don't have anyone who can do that.
That might be true, I cannot say I have seen a lot of Neves but even though Matic does those things well he doesn't dictate play. We need someone for this, if not Neves then someone.Is he though? Is he better in possession, at press resistance and a more progressive passer than Matic?
I’m not even a big fan of Matic but he’s got a certain class about him and I’ve not witnessed Neves play at that level.
I think you’re selling him a bit short. I’ve only seen him in a handful of Wolves games I admit, but each time I’ve thought how good he was and how we don’t have a player like him. His passing range is really good and he can spot openings for runs forward, definitely more progressive than anything we currently have.If that’s the case, and I’m not sure as I’ve not watched a great deal of him at Wolves, then we definitely should not be interested.
Basically a tidy passer but painfully slow? We have Matic already who ticks those boxes.
As far as I can see we aren’t strongly linked anyway. We seem to be creating this link with him here on the caf.
For those who have watched him more than me, how does he compare with Jorginho? Is he near as good and is him a really similar type of player?
Yeah given Ole's preference to play counter attacking football I would not be surprised if this is the case. With a solid defence we need someone who can make the clever transitional passes, you're going to have Bruno, Pogba, Rashford and Sancho all ahead of him dragging defenders out of position so its much more beneficial to have someone with an eye for a killer pass than what McFred can currently offer. The defensive requirement will hopefully have lessened by having Varane in there.The fact that we aren't linked to an Ndidi/Kante/Matuidi type of DM/CM is an indication that we are looking for something different. For me the most important aspect of any CM that we do sign is the ability to hold and progress the ball to our attackers, whilst offering a defensive contribution.
We have a solid defence and should be able to play a higher line with Varane's recovery pace. That said, if we were to do so, as an opposition manager I'd be targeting the space behind Shaw (who likes to get forward) and Maguire. I digress but the point is I don't see us signing an out and out DM, rightly or wrongly.
We need his type of calm but all defences need that destroyer in front of them to see it at its very best. Likewise allows the fbs to overload midfield.This is what we need more in my opinion. With our defence now, surely we don't need a pure destroyer in front of them. We would be better off with someone who can do some work covering the defence, but can play the ball up the pitch or onto the wings quickly and accurately. I like McFred but they are both limited passers.
If that’s the case, and I’m not sure as I’ve not watched a great deal of him at Wolves, then we definitely should not be interested.
Basically a tidy passer but painfully slow? We have Matic already who ticks those boxes.
As far as I can see we aren’t strongly linked anyway. We seem to be creating this link with him here on the caf.
Totally agree. More than individual brilliance, it is the balance of the team that matters the most. Now that we have sorted CB and RW, I strongly believe Neves can be the missing jigsaw piece in the center midfield.Matic is like a CB sitting in front of defense. He's got every characteristics of a CB ie he's got decent positioning, he's good in air, he's not that mobile and he's strong. He's perfect in a midfield trio with Pogba in it as you only had to add a half decent B2B to it and you're done. The downside to that is that you're basically playing with 10 players as Matic would produce next to nothing in terms of creativity etc. Which is why Sir Alex used to hate these sort of players.
Neves is more like an inferior version of Carrick. He's defensively sound, he's not particularly fast but his positioning covers for that and he's got great passing range. The difference between Neves and Carrick was that the latter was stronger, taller and had world class positioning. That meant that in his prime he could support a midfield duo with Scholes without the added support of the likes of a McT/Fred/Cleverley (I am not comparing McT to Cleverley, the former is way better then the latter). Having said that Sir Alex would still add more steel to the team when needed. That was achieved by
a- playing Teveth-Rooney upfront
b- play Fletcher or Park on the flanks
c- adding Cleverley in midfield when Carrick starting showing signs of ageing.
Sir Alex had two hardworking beasts in midfield (Ince-Keane with Butt in reserve), then he shifted to a makeshift striker with Keane moving in a deeper role, then he bought a deep lying playmaker to play alongside Scholes only to end up with a 'ridiculous' midfield made up of a 40 year old, a deep lying playmaker and a headless chicken who was barely EPL level. Despite all of that he kept winning. The secret to that was balance.ie the correct measure of workrate and creativity.
Now lets have a look at our team. Forward wise its splendid. We've got Cavani/Greenwood upfront, Rashford/Martial on the left, Bruno/VDB as no 10, Sancho/Elanga/Diallo as RW. The same can be said about the defensive unit. Henderson/DDG are not quite WC but very close to that then you've got Shaw on the left, Maguire-Varane as CB and AWB (and possibly Trippier) as RB. What we need is a balanced midfield who can win the ball and deliver it forward as quickly and as effective as possible. We don't have that at United at the moment. McFred provide plenty of energy but they are very average in their passing which means that they slow our game down. McT/Fred and Pogba sort the creativity part. Unfortunately Pogba is a defensive liability which is something McT/Fred can't provide on their own. I think that a MCT/Fred and Neves CM can do the trick.
Totally agree. More than individual brilliance, it is the balance of the team that matters the most. Now that we have sorted CB and RW, I strongly believe Neves can be the missing jigsaw piece in the center midfield.
Is he an actual DM or a faux DM who passes the ball well and does it aesthetically?
Matic is like a CB sitting in front of defense. He's got every characteristics of a CB ie he's got decent positioning, he's good in air, he's not that mobile and he's strong. He's perfect in a midfield trio with Pogba in it as you only had to add a half decent B2B to it and you're done. The downside to that is that you're basically playing with 10 players as Matic would produce next to nothing in terms of creativity etc. Which is why Sir Alex used to hate these sort of players.
Neves is more like an inferior version of Carrick. He's defensively sound, he's not particularly fast but his positioning covers for that and he's got great passing range. The difference between Neves and Carrick was that the latter was stronger, taller and had world class positioning. That meant that in his prime he could support a midfield duo with Scholes without the added support of the likes of a McT/Fred/Cleverley (I am not comparing McT to Cleverley, the former is way better then the latter). Having said that Sir Alex would still add more steel to the team when needed. That was achieved by
a- playing Teveth-Rooney upfront
b- play Fletcher or Park on the flanks
c- adding Cleverley in midfield when Carrick starting showing signs of ageing.
Sir Alex had two hardworking beasts in midfield (Ince-Keane with Butt in reserve), then he shifted to a makeshift striker with Keane moving in a deeper role, then he bought a deep lying playmaker to play alongside Scholes only to end up with a 'ridiculous' midfield made up of a 40 year old, a deep lying playmaker and a headless chicken who was barely EPL level. Despite all of that he kept winning. The secret to that was balance.ie the correct measure of workrate and creativity.
Now lets have a look at our team. Forward wise its splendid. We've got Cavani/Greenwood upfront, Rashford/Martial on the left, Bruno/VDB as no 10, Sancho/Elanga/Diallo as RW. The same can be said about the defensive unit. Henderson/DDG are not quite WC but very close to that then you've got Shaw on the left, Maguire-Varane as CB and AWB (and possibly Trippier) as RB. What we need is a balanced midfield who can win the ball and deliver it forward as quickly and as effective as possible. We don't have that at United at the moment. McFred provide plenty of energy but they are very average in their passing which means that they slow our game down. McT/Fred and Pogba sort the creativity part. Unfortunately Pogba is a defensive liability which is something McT/Fred can't provide on their own. I think that a MCT/Fred and Neves CM can do the trick.
Ask Mike Phelan.What does Ruben Neves actually do?
Matic has the most progressive passing of our midfielders, and by far the most progressive dribbling of any our of players. He's by far the best midfielder we have at building play from deep and its not even close.Matic is like a CB sitting in front of defense. He's got every characteristics of a CB ie he's got decent positioning, he's good in air, he's not that mobile and he's strong. He's perfect in a midfield trio with Pogba in it as you only had to add a half decent B2B to it and you're done. The downside to that is that you're basically playing with 10 players as Matic would produce next to nothing in terms of creativity etc. Which is why Sir Alex used to hate these sort of players.
Matic with Fred should have been a good combination based on that. Not sure whether we even tried that but if we did, I don’t remember being either excited or reassured by it.Matic has the most progressive passing of our midfielders, and by far the most progressive dribbling of any our of players. He's by far the best midfielder we have at building play from deep and its not even close.
We did, it was horrible.Matic with Fred should have been a good combination based on that. Not sure whether we even tried that but if we did, I don’t remember being either excited or reassured by it.
We did, it was horrible.
Agreed.Keep seeing how he is supposedly a deep lying playmaker who runs games, and yet Wolves have been one of the more pragmatic sides around that don't really play possession football. Something doesn't really tally there. He's either not getting the opportunity to backup these claims because of their style imposed by Nuno or he's simply not all he's cracked up to be and we underrate our own as usual. Pinging a few long range passes is not exactly a key skill we require either, no idea why that's constantly brought up as a reason to get him. Maguire, Lindelof, Pogba have a decent range of passing, it's not exactly a key failing.
Exactly. Matic is a a fantastic deep lying midfielder when on his game. He controls the midfield much better than any of our other central midfielders Pogba included.Matic has the most progressive passing of our midfielders, and by far the most progressive dribbling of any our of players. He's by far the best midfielder we have at building play from deep and its not even close.
Not a shock.We did, it was horrible.
Keep seeing how he is supposedly a deep lying playmaker who runs games, and yet Wolves have been one of the more pragmatic sides around that don't really play possession football. Something doesn't really tally there. He's either not getting the opportunity to backup these claims because of their style imposed by Nuno or he's simply not all he's cracked up to be and we underrate our own as usual. Pinging a few long range passes is not exactly a key skill we require either, no idea why that's constantly brought up as a reason to get him. Maguire, Lindelof, Pogba have a decent range of passing, it's not exactly a key failing.
No, but what's his excuse? Moutinho is a pretty good player. They've got Dendoncker who can anchor things if need be and give guys license to play. The fact is they played pragmatic football, I would have thought if this guy was half as good as made out here he'd have been more consistently impressive and elevated the side.Is he all eleven players?
What we need is someone who will improve the midfield ASAP, i.e. at a price we can afford now in this window.No, but what's his excuse? Moutinho is a pretty good player. They've got Dendoncker who can anchor things if need be and give guys license to play. The fact is they played pragmatic football, I would have thought if this guy was half as good as made out here he'd have been more consistently impressive and elevated the side.
If he's so good why has he not truly shone since they were in the championship? Why are they getting him out the door?
I just think people get carried away because he's on the market for X amount, nevermind whether he's actually a decent upgrade or simply a waste of funds that could be directed towards genuine quality. Someone like Locatelli looks miles better in reality and the stats show that too. We need quality players or potentially quality, not someone who's never really done it at club or international level.
Pops in a long-rang banger every now and then. But apart from that I am never impressed. My go-to comment on Neves is that in all of our meetings the last few years I hardly noticed him.** I was almost always more impressed by Moutinho who, at least against us, looked very good and covered every blade etc etc.What does Ruben Neves actually do?