Roy Keane

What’d VVD say?

VVD said only one team came to win and Utd were buzzing with a point.

Keane called him arrogant, said he's playing for a club that's won one title in 30 years and he's no reason to be talking like that.

Then says he played Liverpool and many times they were happy to get a draw.
 
Absolutely love this man. He’s what Souness wishes he was - though he’s dour, bitter and humourless instead.

Keane never misses and he’s absolutely spot on with that prick, van Dijk.
 
Van Dijk saying Utd were buzzing to get a draw. Keane giving it to Sturridge when he is trying to defend Van Dijk.
 
While slightly over the top, what Van Dijk said was largely true. Invoking the past, which has little relevance in terms of today’s game, in order to put down Van Dijk and Liverpool seems a bit small-time.
 
While slightly over the top, what Van Dijk said was largely true. Invoking the past, which has little relevance in terms of today’s game, in order to put down Van Dijk and Liverpool seems a bit small-time.
Come on.
 
While slightly over the top, what Van Dijk said was largely true. Invoking the past, which has little relevance in terms of today’s game, in order to put down Van Dijk and Liverpool seems a bit small-time.
Van Dijk was obviously being a cnut though, there's nothing small time about calling a cnut out for being a cnut.
 
While slightly over the top, what Van Dijk said was largely true. Invoking the past, which has little relevance in terms of today’s game, in order to put down Van Dijk and Liverpool seems a bit small-time.
Whilst also largely arrogant. Keane was completely right to respond as he did.
 
While slightly over the top, what Van Dijk said was largely true. Invoking the past, which has little relevance in terms of today’s game, in order to put down Van Dijk and Liverpool seems a bit small-time.

Except we had a couple of very decent chances to score? Including probably the best chance of the match?

VVD it's talking out of his arse. Yeah they dominated the game but we had our moments to nick it... And they didn't really create a solid chance.
 
While slightly over the top, what Van Dijk said was largely true. Invoking the past, which has little relevance in terms of today’s game, in order to put down Van Dijk and Liverpool seems a bit small-time.

Thing is, it wasn’t.

A draw was more than fair. Liverpool didn’t deserve to win the game.
 
While slightly over the top, what Van Dijk said was largely true. Invoking the past, which has little relevance in terms of today’s game, in order to put down Van Dijk and Liverpool seems a bit small-time.
Invoking feelings and intentions has absolute no relevance to today’s game. We were there for the taking, Liverpool were not good enough to take advantage and we grew into the second half when it could have either way. That’s all that matters not “who was buzzing” and “who truly wanted to win” - which is just loser mentality nonsense the Liverpool side is using to wipe their salty tears.
 
Love Roy but we need to stop holding on to the past. Get people who are professional and have expeience in those roles. What does the football “board” even do?!

Keane in many ways represents what the supporters want.
He has no filters of course.
Even I do not agree with everything he says.
The last thing we need is a diplomat.

A Football board would only be involved in matters of football and not Financial matters.
 
Last edited:
Except we had a couple of very decent chances to score? Including probably the best chance of the match?

VVD it's talking out of his arse. Yeah they dominated the game but we had our moments to nick it... And they didn't really create a solid chance.
No mate. We didn’t win this match because we didn’t actually want to. This stuff is so stupid you wonder how it comes out of educated people’s mouths.
 
While slightly over the top, what Van Dijk said was largely true. Invoking the past, which has little relevance in terms of today’s game, in order to put down Van Dijk and Liverpool seems a bit small-time.
We lost 7-0 the last time and are in terrible form and ravaged by injuries, but Liverpool couldn't beat us at Anfield today. Van Dijk was being a salty cnut and Roy put him in his place.
 
Said that “only one team wanted to win” and “Utd were buzzing with that point”.

Roy said that VVD should remember that Liverpool have one PL title in 33 years, and were buzzing for many a point against Utd in the past.
Arrogant as though they’re the dominant force and not 4 years since a league title playing in the Europa.
 
Stop holding on to the past? What? It's a reference point to make a point more clear. Completely relevant.
 
Thing is, it wasn’t.

A draw was more than fair. Liverpool didn’t deserve to win the game.
Sorry but that’s just objectively wrong.

They had 34 shots to our six, eight on target with one for us, 69 percent ball-possession, and 12 corners to our zero. An xG of 2.3 to our 0.6.

It was a positive performance from us but Liverpool absolutely deserved to win.
 
Sorry but that’s just objectively wrong.

They had 34 shots to our six, eight on target with one for us, 69 percent ball-possession, and 12 corners to our zero. An xG of 2.3 to our 0.6.

It was a positive performance from us but Liverpool absolutely deserved to win.

You didn’t watch the game did you?
 
Sorry but that’s just objectively wrong.

They had 34 shots to our six, eight on target with one for us 69 percent ball-possession and 12 corners to our zero. An xG of 2.3 to our 0.6.

It was a positive performance from us but Liverpool absolutely deserved to win.

Did they feck.

They did not create one clear cut scoring opportunity, setpieces and long shots was all the had.
 
I'm surprised there's some United fans that didn't appreciate what Keane said. I've only read it on here and I was smiling. I now need to see the clip so you get the bonus of hearing him say it himself with his lovely Irish accent.
 
While slightly over the top, what Van Dijk said was largely true. Invoking the past, which has little relevance in terms of today’s game, in order to put down Van Dijk and Liverpool seems a bit small-time.
That's BS, VVD was being a disrespective arsehole, we might not be great upfront but suggeting we weren't trying to win is just hiding the fact that his team couldn't score a goal either
 
Sorry but that’s just objectively wrong.

They had 34 shots to our six, eight on target with one for us, 69 percent ball-possession, and 12 corners to our zero. An xG of 2.3 to our 0.6.

It was a positive performance from us but Liverpool absolutely deserved to win.
Why does a team with a better xG ‘deserve’ to win? I’d love to know. They didn’t take any of their chances and most of them shots seemed to be pot shots from range. It’s not even as though they played exquisite football or anything.