Keane's right about some got a bit carried away about that spurs game. The goals involved fortunate deflections (Fred's goal and how the ball ends up going to Fernandes) and Rashford wasted a few good opportunities. Most of all, it was potentially also just spurs being spurs.
Results and performances are very much up and down, with and without Ronaldo. It's evident that we need a striker that can score goals, on paper you'd pick Ronaldo to do that over Rashford. Neither are doing the business though, that's objective truth. Is Ronaldo our best option to get us goals? When the competition is Rashford then you can see why people are split over who you'd pick. One has an incredible amount of credit in the bank and Keane knows his character.
I can see both points of view. Ultimately Ronaldo has let this standards slip in his chances this season, and his actions against Spurs were ridiculous and rightfully punished. Given our lack of striker options I'd prefer to see him come back into the side, fired up and scoring goals, cause goals are certainly what we need. If he's unlikely to do anything better than what we've seen so far then clearly the sooner we sell the better, we don't need two wasteful strikers and certainly not one on his wages (or Rashford's to be fair!).
.