RedStarUnited
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2008
- Messages
- 8,235
This is looking like a better decision by the day: selling a striker who has scored 9 in 11.
People say selling him was the right choice and it was not getting a replacement that was the problem, but that inherently makes selling him the wrong choice. If you are saying that a player needs a replacement, it is clear that that player had a positive impact on the team.
If they had no impact or a negative impact, selling should have had either a positive impact or no impact at all. It is pretty clear that selling him has completely destroyed our goalscoring ability. Awful decision.
No - Because I am pretty sure we were never going to get anyone else willing to pay 75m for him again. We sold at the most opportune moment given ours and Inters needs.