Schmeichel's Cartwheel
Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Does anybody have the date of this cnuts last goal? I wanna do the math and calculate how much we've paid him since he last actually did his job.
Thanks
Thanks
Forget it. This is the sad part that i don't really remember when was the last time he scored for us. Him being our lead striker ffsDoes anybody have the date of this cnuts last goal? I wanna do the math and calculate how much we've paid him since he last actually did his job.
Thanks
He isn't fat. He is just very heavy.
I think that he is actually working hard on the pitch but due to the weight, it is extremely cumbersome to move.
If he lost 10KG, I promise you, that he'd look far more energetic. If he lost 15kg, he'd be very energetic (his 1st touch would still suck, though).
Maybe being so top heavy has impacted on his centre of gravity and balance. Not sure. But his touch when the ball comes into him doesn't help, as he regularly is then immediately then fighting for position to get to the ball again.He does seem to have bulked up a lot over the past few years so how come he gets knocked off the ball so often?
A callback to one of the caf's finest moments shitting on Luke Shaw last summer for how he looks.
Ok and we finished 6th. We were better off with Lukaku up front.
Last bit is utter nonsense.
Seeing that it has worked out well for Shaw, let's hope it works once more time .
Oh so you're taking credit for Luke Shaw's form?
What form? He’s been shite. Leicester goal aside.Oh so you're taking credit for Luke Shaw's form?
He does seem to have bulked up a lot over the past few years so how come he gets knocked off the ball so often?
That guy is a WUM. He has been spouting drivel about Lukaku having a better impact than Zlatan.Zlatan scored 1 league goal more than Lukaka, strange to then suggest we went from 6th -2nd because of Lukaku?
Lukaku's returns in the Premier league are dreadful bar one season, his final one for Everton.
His Premier league returns to date are 17 goals, 15, 10, 18, 25 & 16. Meaning he provides and average of 16 premier league goals per season.
That is not the mark of a world class striker or great premier league forward.
His last goal at OT was now nearly 9 months ago, its shocking we have folks defending this.
Regardless of that, his all round game is nothing short of embarrassing. Jimmy Saville had a warmer more comforting touch than Lukaku! He offers us literally next to nothing when he is not scoring goals, cause he can't make something from nothing.
Of course it's strange, those aren't even the same persons!Zlatan scored 1 league goal more than Lukaka, strange to then suggest we went from 6th -2nd because of Lukaku?
Lukaku's returns in the Premier league are dreadful bar one season, his final one for Everton.
His Premier league returns to date are 17 goals, 15, 10, 18, 25 & 16. Meaning he provides and average of 16 premier league goals per season.
That is not the mark of a world class striker or great premier league forward.
His last goal at OT was now nearly 9 months ago, its shocking we have folks defending this.
Regardless of that, his all round game is nothing short of embarrassing. Jimmy Saville had a warmer more comforting touch than Lukaku! He offers us literally next to nothing when he is not scoring goals, cause he can't make something from nothing.
All jokes aside, imo him playing the anchor man #9 could be the reason for him bulking up. He's never played it and it doesn't come natural to him, hence why he's getting bigger. Also I've never seen a man with such physical gifts getting shrugged off the ball so easily in some occasions like Lukaku. It appears that for all muscle and big frame, he lacks core strength.
Granted; it is a bit of a conspiracy theory this.I don't see the causality here mate. So because of a "new" role he gains 20 pounds and ruin all mobility needed to be a great striker? Like I always say, look at Kane, Lewandowski, Ronaldo and all the comparable, great strikers. They are not 105 kilos of pure granite, and there is a reason for it.
Granted; it is a bit of a conspiracy theory this.
At the same time I am pretty convinced that Mourinho and the coaches really have wanted to work on improving Lukakus hold-up play. And since it was terrible to begin with and did not get better during his first year, they might have tried a new approach and asked him to put on some muscle instead.
If there is any truth to it; it has not worked though.
I don't see the causality here mate. So because of a "new" role he gains 20 pounds and ruin all mobility needed to be a great striker? Like I always say, look at Kane, Lewandowski, Ronaldo and all the comparable, great strikers. They are not 105 kilos of pure granite, and there is a reason for it.
More compilations of the great man courtesy of @Drygon
I fear for him under a new manager, especially if it's a manager with a progressive philosophy.
More compilations of the great man courtesy of @Drygon
I fear for him under a new manager, especially if it's a manager with a progressive philosophy.
Shielding the ball is far more about technique and balance than brute strength.
Agreed, so what is the point of the bulk? It seems to be making his overall game worse.
Not sure why people bring up his size constantly.
The club will have nutritionists etc who will know a hell of a lot more than posters on here. I would imagine all the players are weighed and have their body fat measured regularly, and the club will keep them at certain weights.
If Lukaku wasn't listening to what he's told by staff, he wouldn't be playing.
I don't think he's good enough, and never really have, but I don't think you can use his size as the issue. It's his touch and lack of effort that lets him down.
Not sure why people bring up his size constantly.
The club will have nutritionists etc who will know a hell of a lot more than posters on here. I would imagine all the players are weighed and have their body fat measured regularly, and the club will keep them at certain weights.
If Lukaku wasn't listening to what he's told by staff, he wouldn't be playing.
I don't think he's good enough, and never really have, but I don't think you can use his size as the issue. It's his touch and lack of effort that lets him down.
Dude, did you even read your post before submitting? Having a sweet touch and great effort is 100% linked to his abnormous physique. The bigger and stronger he is, the heavier the touch gets, he has more force behind everything he does. The heavier he is, and the guy is over 100 kilos (!), the harder it gets to run around, his stamina will definitely go down over 90 minutes and his agility is severely hampered. He needs to lose 10 kilos asap to function properly, especially as we see no evidence of those extra muscles leading to anything good.
Dude, did you even read your post before submitting? Having a sweet touch and great effort is 100% linked to his abnormous physique. The bigger and stronger he is, the heavier the touch gets, he has more force behind everything he does. The heavier he is, and the guy is over 100 kilos (!), the harder it gets to run around, his stamina will definitely go down over 90 minutes and his agility is severely hampered. He needs to lose 10 kilos asap to function properly, especially as we see no evidence of those extra muscles leading to anything good.
Nah, the good folks of RedCafe knows better.
His first touch has absolutely nothing to do with his physique.
Exactly. I'd wager half of them haven't played football at any decent level, or have any understanding of strength training. The people devising the players work outs know a lot more than anyone on here.
Why not ?
It literally has nothing to do with it. Have you ever played football? Many people have good touches despite having a terrible physique. It isn't even remotely linked.
It literally has nothing to do with it. Have you ever played football? Many people have good touches despite having a terrible physique. It isn't even remotely linked.
His current physique is similar to mine and I'm about as unfit as they come along after multiple surgeries over the past 2 years.