But then if we're playing fairly negative football in which the service for our main striker is going to be limited, which I'd argue we knew was going to be the case with Mourinho in many big games, then questions have to be asked as to why we've spent so much money on someone who thrives off of good service and regular chances. I think that's a question more on Mourinho than Lukaku, though; his main traits are that he's very clinical in front of goal, but in order for that to happen we've got to be creating him chances. Right now we aren't, and a significant part of that is down to the football we're playing.