RyanGoggs
Insists on dating women in public places - for the
Best ball striking technique since scholes?
Best ball striking technique since scholes?
He is better at striking a ball than Scholes.
That was harsh. I wouldn't call Berbatov a nightmare - top scorer one season and scored a lot the following season the few times he was given a chance.
before the signing, i said he would end up with a 100 goals to his name in our shirt but feck me i didn't know he'd get off the mark this quick.
Every week he plays, he's going above and beyond what I even dreamed of and makes up for the nightmare that we endured with berbatov.
It wasn't harsh; it was retarded. Berbatov might not have justified his price tag, but he was hardly a nightmare that we had to endure.
However, back to RVP, I think he's been everything we could've hoped for. He's just so smooth and clinical - it's incredible to think that Arsenal once boasted him, Fabregas and Nasri (along with some other very good players,) and yet they still won no silverware.
That was harsh. I wouldn't call Berbatov a nightmare - top scorer one season and scored a lot the following season the few times he was given a chance.
Assuming no more major injuries (a big assumption, I agree), how many years do we think we will get out of Van Persie as an automatic starter?
I don't mean 'prolong' his career, like Giggs, Scoles, Neville or like Rio is starting to do.
Can a striker of his type play at full felt till 34 or beyond? What other examples are there?
Arsenal fans opinions most important given you know the player better than we do.
Yeah, but he was only a good player, not a top class.
Assuming no more major injuries (big assumption), how many years do we think we will get out of Van Persie as an automatic starter?
I don't mean 'prolong' his career, like Giggs, Scoles, Neville or like Rio is starting to do.
Can a striker of his type play at full felt till 34 or beyond? What other examples are there?
(Arsenal fans opinions most important given you know the player better than we do)
To think some fans didn't want him. We've bought a truly great striker for a touch over 20m. That's not bad is it...
As I said, it's the same age Zidane was when he moved to Real and only a year older than Figo who was a winger and needed pace more than van Persie ever will. Both proved to be excellet signings for Real, van Persie will do the same at United. That's an advantage of buying a proven performer, you know you're getting top quality and there's very little risk involved if he suits your style which van Persie obviously did.
Was he actually offside for the chance before Evra's goal on the corner? The idiots on rawk seem adamant that he was. I don't rememeber him being offside at all.
- but given the opportunity to smash a long shot then Scholes could strike it better than anyone who has been at the club in recent times.
Nope.
Ronaldo disagrees strongly.
Nope. Ronaldo scored long goals that Scholes couldn't have, but Scholes' consistency in hitting the target with those piledrivers is unparalleled, whereas Ronaldo would sky five for every one on target. To be honest it's a silly comparison, different players, roles in the team, shooting styles etc etc.
If you could go back in time and make it so we signed Hazard and not Van Persie, would you?
If you could go back in time and make it so we signed Hazard and not Van Persie, would you?
You'd have to ask that question in a couple of years time... but right now, I think it's not outlandish to say we probably wouldn't be top of the league if we had Hazard instead of RVP.
Ronaldo disagrees strongly.
Given the choice of player to hit a shot for us from 30-35 yards, Ronaldo wins every single time, that's my only point.
He's utterly brilliant. I have never realized just how good he is, until his move to United.
Everything he does is so well-thought-out and the execution is almost always perfect.
The best player at the club.