Wenger says he turned down £300k a week to play for us but I'm sure a certain someone will turn up and say he's still a merchant because he's earning more now.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...-deal-to-join-united-says-wenger-8274613.html
Wenger says he turned down £300k a week to play for us but I'm sure a certain someone will turn up and say he's still a merchant because he's earning more now.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...-deal-to-join-united-says-wenger-8274613.html
I love him, when we were first linked with him I wasn't so keen on him, I still remember reading the headline when he first joined us. I instantly let out a vicious scream and thought of all the great moments he would be living with us. His technique, his left foot, his turns and his face are all so beautiful and I hope he breaks many records.
He's so charming in interviews. Makes me want to buy him a drink.
You'd think, given the current incendiary football climate, the media would avoid stirring up any potential crowd trouble; not so...Goal.com leads today with an exclusive (from an anonymous source, naturally) claiming that Van Persie had an 'explosive' meeting with Arsene Wenger before RVP's move to United. The article practically absolves both the manager & Van Persie's former club of blame for RVP's departure (how predictable...), stating that Robin demanded the signing of world-class players and the appointment of a genuine assistant manager, not a 'yes' man like Steve Bould. All this, of course, makes RVP appear to be an egomaniac who thought he was bigger than the club & his coach, and makes Wenger look as if he had no option but to sell the 'greedy, wantaway star'.
Naturally, this kind of slanted puff piece for Arsenal's benefit will heighten the hostility towards RVP on Saturday; it's the type of sourceless, biased nonsense anyone could make up. Fans are often only too willing to take their club's side, even against common sense - the incurious thinking is 'Players are all overpaid and greedy, so Player X has betrayed our club!'; this is naive, and clubs play on this somewhat understandable club-loyalty (as Arsenal appear to be doing here). Even if the story were true, few enough Arsenal fans will appreciate the subtext: that Arsenal, and Wenger, need a change of approach regarding their mutual ambition. Who, reasonably, could blame Van Persie for leaving?
'Revealed: Van Persie told Wenger which players to sign for Arsenal in explosive meeting':
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896...-persie-told-wenger-which-players-to-sign-for
If that would really be one of his biggest reasons, than he couldn't have chosen a "worse club" in that aspect
I pray he scores against Arsenal. I will be showing the Youtube to my gooner friends for years to come.
You'd think, given the current incendiary football climate, the media would avoid stirring up any potential crowd trouble; not so...Goal.com leads today with an exclusive (from an anonymous source, naturally) claiming that Van Persie had an 'explosive' meeting with Arsene Wenger before RVP's move to United. The article practically absolves both the manager & Van Persie's former club of blame for RVP's departure (how predictable...), stating that Robin demanded the signing of world-class players and the appointment of a genuine assistant manager, not a 'yes' man like Steve Bould. All this, of course, makes RVP appear to be an egomaniac who thought he was bigger than the club & his coach, and makes Wenger look as if he had no option but to sell the 'greedy, wantaway star'.
Naturally, this kind of slanted puff piece for Arsenal's benefit will heighten the hostility towards RVP on Saturday; it's the type of sourceless, biased nonsense anyone could make up. Fans are often only too willing to take their club's side, even against common sense - the incurious thinking is 'Players are all overpaid and greedy, so Player X has betrayed our club!'; this is naive, and clubs play on this somewhat understandable club-loyalty (as Arsenal appear to be doing here). Even if the story were true, few enough Arsenal fans will appreciate the subtext: that Arsenal, and Wenger, need a change of approach regarding their mutual ambition. Who, reasonably, could blame Van Persie for leaving?
'Revealed: Van Persie told Wenger which players to sign for Arsenal in explosive meeting':
http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/2896...-persie-told-wenger-which-players-to-sign-for
But if your players undermine your manager, what does that say about the club? I seem to recall Vieira pulled the same stunt a few years ago, but Arsenal's objectives were much different then (they targeted titles) so bringing in youth was accepted.If that Goal.com piece is true I don't really see anything wrong with it - he was in the process of making a major career choice and telling Wenger what he had to do if he wanted to keep him. I'd have done the same thing in his shoes, he doesn't owe Arsenal anything and he doesn't have to behave like a mindless automaton doing everything his manager tells him to without question.
But if your players undermine your manager, what does that say about the club? I seem to recall Vieira pulled the same stunt a few years ago, but Arsenal's objectives were much different then (they targeted titles) so bringing in youth was accepted.
From what I gather, Van Persie wasn't satisfied with the quality of players brought in and Wenger's faith in duds like Ramsey supposedly. Nor failure to keep hold of their best players -- to think that Djourou and injury-prone Diaby are the longest serving players at the club is startling. Perhaps Wenger thought that by selling Van Persie, the team's shape and system would be more fluid and that they could score goals.
I'm watching the game tomorrow at my mate's house (Arse fan), safe to say it's gonna be mental especialy if (or should I say when) he scores. I expect him to be very classy about it, but it won't stop my mate from calling him every name in the book
It is disconcerting how Ferguson and Wenger have become best friends now. I'm starting to think that Ferguson kidnapped Arsene and replaced him with Kodos.
I think a common enemy in the structures of clubs like City and Chelsea have brought them together on common ground.
I think a common enemy in the structures of clubs like City and Chelsea have brought them together on common ground.
Definitely have developed a mutual respect.
They were once the enemy, but have grown quite fond of each other over the years. Im sure fergie respects him massively and they both understand the pressures on eachother. To last as long as they both have is remarkable.
I think it has a lot to do with Arsenal not competing with us anymore too. The respect must always have been there but the fact that Arsenal arent competing anymore means they can be more glowing about each other.
True, but I think the emergence of clubs like City and Chelsea would have softened the relationship a little bit regardless. If we had to lose the league this season, I'd rather Arsenal won it than anyone else. And I think Fergie would agree, because if Arsenal win you can definitely pull them back. But I remember a sense last season that if City won, and then kept on spending, there'd be no way for us to get back on top.
Its like having Van Nistelrooy back. He's absolutely deadly in the penalty area.