Rivaldo's on a free

  • Thread starter JordiCruyffsleftpeg
  • Start date
Leave Eric out of this. He´s the king and has done far too much for us.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>

Some even jump into stands and kick the shit out of fans.</strong><hr></blockquote>

I think most people could empathise with Cantona wanting to give that abusive fan a kicking.
I don't think anyone felt the same about Rivaldo pretending to be fatally wounded when a football bounced of his shin.
People with forgive the flaws of rashness, anger and even stupidity in their players, but cheating is harder to ignore.
 
Do me a favour Raoul, how can you equate time wasting (which isn't cheating actually) and whatever else you mentioned with what Rivaldo did twice at the world cup? Remember what he said afterwards justifying his actions. The guy is on another level where cheating is concerned.
 
Originally posted by stoned.rose:
<strong>

Yep.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Is this another of your text messages to Jens?
 
Originally posted by charlie's devils:
<strong>

I think most people could empathise with Cantona wanting to give that abusive fan a kicking.
I don't think anyone felt the same about Rivaldo pretending to be fatally wounded when a football bounced of his shin.
People with forgive the flaws of rashness, anger and even stupidity in their players, but cheating is harder to ignore.</strong><hr></blockquote>

It's all relative based on who you are and who you support. I agree that the Eric Selhurst Park incident is quite different, but it nevertheless brings to light the extreme hypocrisy by which fans view players whom they like, and those they dislike. Rivaldo was rightfully disgraced for what he did infront of the entire world, and it simply shouldn't be the prime reason why he should be disqualified for a transfer.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>

It's all relative based on who you are and who you support. I agree that the Eric Selhurst Park incident is quite different, but it nevertheless brings to light the extreme hypocrisy by which fans view players whom they like, and those they dislike. Rivaldo was rightfully disgraced for what he did infront of the entire world, and it simply shouldn't be the prime reason why he should be disqualified for a transfer.</strong><hr></blockquote>

It´s not rivaldo´s cheating that pisses me off, it´s his general behaviour. he only played in 50% of barca´s league matches last season and simply looks uninterest to me most of the time. hes a good player when he can be arsed to play, but i simply dont think his character would fit in at old trafford.
 
If Rivaldo was playing for us and getting away with cheating the problem exactly is ?
 
Originally posted by Cantona 007:
<strong>If Rivaldo was playing for us and getting away with cheating the problem exactly is ?</strong><hr></blockquote>

I'd imagine for some people the club's image is important, and having someone rolling around like a nonce tarnishes the good work done by the likes of Edwards, Charlton, Robson et al.
 
Like Beckham's constant rolling around is begining to.
 
Originally posted by Dans:
<strong>Like Beckham's constant rolling around is begining to.</strong><hr></blockquote>

He is becoming increasingly nonce-like.
 
I was quick to "defend" Rivaldo when people were just going on and on about him having to be banned and all sorts of bollocks. He did wrong, lots of others do, period.

He bragged about it, which makes him a prick.

I am not concerned about one or two cheating incidents, see that everywhere and won't crucify one player for it.

BUT

His bragging about it shows a lot of traits we could already observe and confirmed. First, he thinks he is bigger than anything else, not club but country and FIFA and football itself. He is a self-centered prick which makes him unsuitable for United.

Worse, troughout France 98 and KJ 02, he kept going on about how it was not his responsibility to keep assisting Ronaldo and how he also wanted to score himself. You could clearly see up until the final he kept trying the one-man approach on his personal mission to get the Golden Boot.

I won't have that in our team, that's pretty much it.
 
Rivaldo? Free?
Just sign him on a 2 year deal for 5mill. a season = 10mill. That's nothing for a club like us. If he is problem, sell him on. If he's a world beater, then "we win every f_cking cup on the planet!!!" I don't think anyone argue of his ability. He's right up there with Zidane and Figo.
 
Personally I don't give a feck about Rivaldo doing that feigned injury - no one mentioned that the Turks did it during the whole game, its just that Rivaldo couldn't act as well. He was right when he said its part of the game, and I think people are taking out their anger at that fact on him because he became a representative of it. Fact is though that he's no different to most other players in that respect.

Clearly he's one of the best players of recent years, able to win a game on his own in the same way Zidane and Cantona could. Yet the question marks over his work ethic and ego remain, and the work ethic is so central to our team, and the selflessness, that I would have big worries about the effect on the club if he were to come. Besides, he wouldn't fit into our wage structure, we're not going to raise Keano's pay again (he has a clause that says he has to earn more than the other players its alleged), so he'd have to take a massive pay cut to join us.
 
wellfergie rates him higher than zidane, so are u gonna question his judgement???
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>I agree with Neil.

BTW, Don't Becks and Larry make more than Keano ?</strong><hr></blockquote>
No they don't, part of Beckhams new deal was the fact that he earns less than Keano in basic wages, but more overall because of the image rights. They had the pay of all the united players in the daily mail a while back, blanc was not in the top rung of the ladder, ruud and seba were up there though.
 
Becks makes 70k a week, plus 20k in image rights. Does Keano make more than this ? Also Larry makes some ungodly amount per week because we bought him on a free.
 
Right. Did some snooping. Becks and Keano make the same amount per week - 90k. Granted the last 20k for Becks comes from image rights.
 
Originally posted by Roy:
<strong>Rivaldo, as good as he is/was, has fecked up Barca for years with his hold up play..he always takes too much time on the ball and he loses a lot of balls and never tracks back..

At 30 he's not even as good as he used to be + he is a cheating sod and has a huge ego not to mention huge pay demands..</strong><hr></blockquote>

In essence, he works harder for Brazil than for Barcelona, reminds me of a certain Argentinian ;)

I agree though that signing Rivaldo talented he may be, would be a bad move for us. To me, it's more of the ego/sulking attitude problems that he regularly displays than anything else.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>

I wasn't ridiculing you, just using sarcasm to illustrate your overly cynical assessment of Rivaldo.</strong><hr></blockquote>

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> I've been a "victim" of your dry sense of humor once too often!

Anyway, Raoul I believe Rivaldo would overall be a bad signing for us - yes he has exceptional skills but he's rather inconsistent at club level and most importantly, his big-time attitude problems would cause upsets in the dressing room.
Harmony amongst the players shouldn't be under-rated.
 
Originally posted by lchk:
<strong>

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> I've been a "victim" of your dry sense of humor once too often!
</strong><hr></blockquote>

No, he probably just thinks you're a cnut.
 
I doubt Rivaldo would come to us even if we met his wage demands.
Im sure there is a more apealing club - climate wise that would have him.

IF however he is interested in us - it would be stupid if we didnt try and get him.

As much as he is a cheating fcuk - he is also an exceptional player.
 
Originally posted by lchk:
<strong>

<img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> I've been a "victim" of your dry sense of humor once too often!

Anyway, Raoul I believe Rivaldo would overall be a bad signing for us - yes he has exceptional skills but he's rather inconsistent at club level and most importantly, his big-time attitude problems would cause upsets in the dressing room.
Harmony amongst the players shouldn't be under-rated.</strong><hr></blockquote>

I used that same phrase with you yesterday didn't I. ;)

As for Rivaldo....he's not a Fergie type player and the prima dona thing would probably get him in the dog house, irrespective of how little he cost us.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>

I used that same phrase with you yesterday didn't I. ;)

As for Rivaldo....he's not a Fergie type player and the prima dona thing would probably get him in the dog house, irrespective of how little he cost us.</strong><hr></blockquote>

That's precisely why I think Rivaldo wouldn't be a good match for us

If we are really eager to land a left-sided midfielder cum supporting striker, get duff (obviously) or failing that and possibly a cheaper option, Hassan Sas.
 
So whats a cum supporting striker ? :confused:


Agree about Sas and Duff. The fact that we only pay 14m on Rio initially is a good sign that we're going to spend more this year.
 
Originally posted by Raoul:
<strong>So whats a cum supporting striker ? :confused:


Agree about Sas and Duff. The fact that we only pay 14m on Rio initially is a good sign that we're going to spend more this year.</strong><hr></blockquote>

See explanation above.

Thanks paul! :cool:
 
Roy and Raoul are both fags. Rivaldo is one of the best players going around. He would get a game before anyone in Man Utd inc Beckham
 
You sure have made a good impression in your debut posts trendy. <img src="graemlins/houllier.gif" border="0" alt="[Houllier]" /> :eek:
 
Roy and Raoul are both fags. Rivaldo is one of the best players going around. He would get a game before anyone in Man Utd inc Beckham <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" />
 
Originally posted by Trendy:
<strong>Roy and Raoul are both fags. Rivaldo is one of the best players going around. He would get a game before anyone in Man Utd inc Beckham <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laugh Out Loud]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>


I though you couldn't improve on your second post, but how wrong could I be?
By repeating the same words, but adding five laughing smileys you've confounded the critics and set a surely unbeatable precedent with your opening three posts.
A real trio-umph!
 
What do you think Charlie?

Trendy vrs Suckjit

Good contest that
 
Originally posted by reddermo:
<strong>What do you think Charlie?

Trendy vrs Suckjit

Good contest that</strong><hr></blockquote>

Well obviously Suckjit's got to be a threat, but I think the way he's burst on the scene there's no reason Trendy shouldn't be competing with kemo soon for self-satisfied, inane, gibberesh (with laughing smileys optional.)
But let's not get too carried away. We'll have to wait and see how he deals with notoriously difficult fourth post.