Blair
New Member
Tim Cahil as a cheap alternative, I have always thought he was a decent player.
Cahill wouldn't be cheap. And don't you think Manchester United should be aiming higher than 'decent players'? I think that was Rooney's point.
Tim Cahil as a cheap alternative, I have always thought he was a decent player.
Yes I think we should be aiming higher- I just dont think tyhat we can. Cahi,l would fit right in.Cahill wouldn't be cheap. And don't you think Manchester United should be aiming higher than 'decent players'? I think that was Rooney's point.
Yes I think we should be aiming higher- I just dont think tyhat we can. Cahi,l would fit right in.
Cahill wouldn't be cheap. And don't you think Manchester United should be aiming higher than 'decent players'? I think that was Rooney's point.
Cahill is an Alan Smith...
The thing is that we are still unbeaten in the league- without Rooney. He has been gash since March.Are we replacing pre or post March Rooney? Pre then the muppet in me cries out for Bale, Wilshire and either Kaka or the benz frm Madrid as part of the cnuts sale.
Post march there is a rather interesting shaped lump of rock in my garden that could be as useful as the fat scouse twat.
He is better than Alan Smith for sure.
The thing is that we are still unbeaten in the league- without Rooney. He has been gash since March.
What do clubs have to offer?
City = Money, Money, Money
United = Money, History, Trophies, SAF
Chelsea = Money, Money, Trophies
Arsenal = History, History, Wenger
Liverpool = History, History, History
Barca = Money, Money, Trophies, History, Weather
Real = Money, Money, Trophies, History, Weather, Mourinho
What do clubs have to offer?
City = Money, Money, Money
United = Money, History, Trophies, SAF
Chelsea = Money, Money, Trophies
Arsenal = History, History, Wenger
Liverpool = History, History, History
Barca = Money, Money, Trophies, History, Weather
Real = Money, Money, Trophies, History, Weather, Mourinho
Most players only care about money. And you might want to take money out our list of things. Replace it with Bebe.
It depends what you class as a decent sum mate. Times are changing, like I said in the post above, top players cost top money. If you scrimp around buying £12m players you'll find it hard.
Why does everyone want Benzema??
SAF has no problem buying experience if he needs too. Berbatov was 27 when we signed him, and that was at a time when our frontline was very young. With the inevitable departure of Giggs and Scholes we'll be left with a pretty young midfield, I see no reason why SAF won't invest in a top class 27/28 year old if needed, and if the 'value' is there obviously.
However, I'd nearly prefer Diarra over Kaka, as crazy as it seems!
Berbatov wasn't injured and was the PL's best striker in that season... Kaka' has been poor, injured and almost retired if he didn't have his knee surgery in time.
Totally different conditions imo.
If Kaka' was playing at his prime like he was doing so for Milan, I wouldn't have put this debate up.
Not in our policies as he is older than 26...
Because he's awesome.
He has a goal every 4 games for Real despite warming the bench and getting 5 minutes a game, when you're brought on in the 88th minute to still score regularly is a feat, SAF loves him and so what about his prostitute scandal, Ronaldo got a random woman pregnant, Rio missed a drugs test, Anderson wrote off his car drunk driving when out partying when he was supposed to be recovering from his injury this season and Rooney boned a grandma and we all loved him a few weeks ago. Scandals come and go and get forgotten about, what matters is football.
My post wasn't specifically in relation to Kaka, more so this:
My post wasn't specifically in relation to Kaka, more so this:
I agree with the fact that we might bring in someone older than 26, just not Kaka' with a 40m price tag, coming back from a serious injury, and has hardly touched a ball in 8 months.
Berbatov.
How much of Benzema have you watched to call him awesome ?
Now Higuain came from RW to become their most prolific striker... Benzema had no playing time... He is certainly good but not the awesome you claim... No awesome player gets to set his arse on the bench 70% of the time...
Not that I don't rate the lad... but with other strikers playing more consistently and looking much better... I don't see how people will put him as first priority at this current moment to be fair...
He's no better than Alan Smith was in 2004....he's certainly better now.
De Rossi is an overrated pile of dung.
Sanchez is more of a right winger which we don't really need.
Pastore isn't a winger, which begs the question, have you even seen him play?
Hamsik maybe, bit overrated in my view.
Defour, fo shore.
Muller from Bayern
Tevez in his last days at United? Of course you will be benched no matter how awesome you are if somebody else is in better form. If Higuain didn't score so much Benzema would start instead of warming the bench. As it happens, he still comes off the bench and scores when he only has 5 minutes to do so.
But who else is playing more consistently and looking much better who plays for a reputable side? As most of the sides being listed that have these stars can be put down by saying Benzema at Lyon > them. The sides these other kids are coming from are just like Lyon, and Benzema was amazing there therefore directly comparable.
To be kept out by someone in such form isn't a negative reflection on your own ability, especially when you do exactly what is wanted from you each time you do get your chance.
Would be nice but there's probably more chance of us landing Torres.
You're right on Pastore, he's an attacking midfielder - my mistake. I've only seen him a handful of times. Although he looks like he has bags of potential. And surely it wouldn't cost the earth to get him from Palermo.
Cahill is tits. He has been evertons best player for the past couple of seasons.