George Best is the best player ever. But everyone sees the game differently.
As someone who loves playing football, he is the one player I'd love to have on my team.
He's the player I'd love to have been.
George Best is the best player ever. But everyone sees the game differently.
As someone who loves playing football, he is the one player I'd love to have on my team.
1. Cristiano Ronaldo-1012
2. Paul Scholes-866
3. Ryan Giggs-782
4. George Best-763
5. Eric Cantona-710
6. Bobby Charlton-656
7. Roy Keane-555
8. Bryan Robson-408
9. Peter Schmeichel-341
10. Duncan Edwards-235
11. Denis Law-215
12. Wayne Rooney-119
13. Rio Ferdinand-113
14. David Beckham-104
15. Ruud Van Nistelrooy-100
16. Dennis Irwin-60
17. Edwin Van Der Sar-25
18. Gary Neville-19
19. Norman Whiteside-12
19. Paul McGrath-12
good job Cheesy - out of interest, which players just missed out?
He's the player I'd love to have been.
I guess I go back to the question I posed in the voting thread. Did anyone who saw Best play live not place him first (or second if they were old enough to recall Edwards as well).
To me, Best really was all that - up there with Maradona, ahead of Cruyff and the like - and indeed ahead of Charlton and Law. Globally, he was denied the recognition that a WC could have brought but watching him, you knew you were seeing an extraordinary player. Almost a once in a lifetime player.
Almost, because if Ronaldo had stuck around for longer then perhaps he could have matched him and almost, because I remain an optimist that I'll see another one.
Is it not a bit disingenuous to call Charlton a midfielder? I thought he generally played as an inside-forward, and played on the wing just as often as he played as a midfielder? Not that that takes away from his record in anyway, nor does it change Mockney's point...just curious how the older ones would see him. Was he like a Lampard who burst forward from deep, a #10 who drifted all over like Cantona or a supporting forward like Rooney?